San Francisco GiantsvsSan Diego Padres
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
San Diego Padres 4/5 models |
under 2/5 models |
San Diego Padres 2/5 models |
San Diego Padres 2/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
San Diego Padres |
55%
Under 8.5 |
52%
San Diego Padres -1.5 |
54%
Under 4.5 (first 5 innings) |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
San Diego Padres San Diego enters on stronger recent form (3W-2L vs Giants' 2W-3L) with better run differential (-1 vs -6). The Padres' pitching has been mor...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 8.5 Over the last five matches, the Giants have conceded 31 runs across five games (6.2 per game) while the Padres have allowed 18 across five (...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
San Diego Padres -1.5 Padres' superior recent form (3-2 record, +1 run differential vs Giants' 2-3 and -6) suggests they can cover a modest spread in a road game...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Under 4.5 (first 5 innings) First-five-innings totals are typically anchored by starting pitcher performance. Oracle Park suppresses early-game scoring, and September w... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
San Diego Padres |
52%
under |
51%
San Diego Padres |
50%
San Diego Padres |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
San Diego Padres Padres enter with a stronger recent form (WWLWL) than Giants (LLWLW) and better run differential. Oracle Park suppresses offense but favors...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
under Both teams average under 9 runs per game combined in recent outings. Oracle Park and September weather typically limit extra-base hits. Trai...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
San Diego Padres Giants have allowed 31 runs in last 5 games while Padres have kept games close. Run-line value sits with the road side given bullpen usage....
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
San Diego Padres Early innings favor the Padres starter based on handedness splits and Giants' recent slow starts. Home bullpen rest is neutral. Training dat... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
San Diego Padres |
53%
Over 8.5 |
52%
San Diego Padres -1.5 |
54%
San Diego Padres |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
San Diego Padres The San Diego Padres exhibit slightly better recent form with a positive run differential compared to the San Francisco Giants' negative dif...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 8.5 The San Francisco Giants' recent games have been notably high-scoring, averaging over 11 total runs combined in their last five outings. Des...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
San Diego Padres -1.5 Given the San Diego Padres' slightly superior recent form and the San Francisco Giants' documented defensive vulnerabilities, the Padres are...
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
San Diego Padres In the absence of specific starting pitcher information for this future game, the first five innings outcome is projected to follow the over...
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
San Diego Padres |
52%
over |
53%
San Diego Padres |
51%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
San Diego Padres While the Giants have a historical advantage, the current form and the starting pitcher matchup favor the Padres. Blake Snell, despite some...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over The total is set conservatively. Both offenses have shown the ability to score, and while Oracle Park can be a pitcher's park, the projected...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
San Diego Padres Considering the Padres are slightly favored in the moneyline and the offensive potential, covering a -1.5 spread is plausible. The Giants ha...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
over Both starting pitchers have the potential for early struggles. Snell's tendency to issue walks could give the Giants an early opportunity, w...
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
52%
San Francisco Giants |
55%
under |
32%
San Francisco Giants -1.5 |
51%
San Francisco Giants |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
San Francisco Giants No live access — prediction built from training data through early 2025 plus the supplied reference context. The Giants hold a modest home e...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Oracle Park consistently ranks among the most pitcher-friendly parks in MLB, with marine layer air and cool evening temperatures reducing ca...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
32%
San Francisco Giants -1.5 Run-line bets on a near coin-flip game heavily favor the underdog taking +1.5, and a pitcher's park like Oracle Park further caps blowout po...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
San Francisco Giants First-five markets strip out bullpen variance and lean heavily on the starter matchup, where neither club historically holds a dominant edge... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusSan Diego Padres 4/5
San Diego enters on stronger recent form (3W-2L vs Giants' 2W-3L) with better run differential (-1 vs -6). The Padres' pitching has been mor...
Padres enter with a stronger recent form (WWLWL) than Giants (LLWLW) and better run differential. Oracle Park suppresses offense but favors...
The San Diego Padres exhibit slightly better recent form with a positive run differential compared to the San Francisco Giants' negative dif...
While the Giants have a historical advantage, the current form and the starting pitcher matchup favor the Padres. Blake Snell, despite some...
No live access — prediction built from training data through early 2025 plus the supplied reference context. The Giants hold a modest home e...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/5
Over the last five matches, the Giants have conceded 31 runs across five games (6.2 per game) while the Padres have allowed 18 across five (...
Both teams average under 9 runs per game combined in recent outings. Oracle Park and September weather typically limit extra-base hits. Trai...
The San Francisco Giants' recent games have been notably high-scoring, averaging over 11 total runs combined in their last five outings. Des...
The total is set conservatively. Both offenses have shown the ability to score, and while Oracle Park can be a pitcher's park, the projected...
Oracle Park consistently ranks among the most pitcher-friendly parks in MLB, with marine layer air and cool evening temperatures reducing ca...
Spread
ConsensusSan Diego Padres 2/5
Padres' superior recent form (3-2 record, +1 run differential vs Giants' 2-3 and -6) suggests they can cover a modest spread in a road game...
Giants have allowed 31 runs in last 5 games while Padres have kept games close. Run-line value sits with the road side given bullpen usage....
Given the San Diego Padres' slightly superior recent form and the San Francisco Giants' documented defensive vulnerabilities, the Padres are...
Considering the Padres are slightly favored in the moneyline and the offensive potential, covering a -1.5 spread is plausible. The Giants ha...
Run-line bets on a near coin-flip game heavily favor the underdog taking +1.5, and a pitcher's park like Oracle Park further caps blowout po...
First 5 innings
ConsensusSan Diego Padres 2/5
First-five-innings totals are typically anchored by starting pitcher performance. Oracle Park suppresses early-game scoring, and September w...
Early innings favor the Padres starter based on handedness splits and Giants' recent slow starts. Home bullpen rest is neutral. Training dat...
In the absence of specific starting pitcher information for this future game, the first five innings outcome is projected to follow the over...
Both starting pitchers have the potential for early struggles. Snell's tendency to issue walks could give the Giants an early opportunity, w...
First-five markets strip out bullpen variance and lean heavily on the starter matchup, where neither club historically holds a dominant edge...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
San Diego Padres
Gemini 2.5 Flash
San Diego Padres
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
San Diego Padres
Grok 4 Fast
San Diego Padres
DeepSeek V3
San Francisco Giants
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
40d20ce9ee28b81e…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 13 · 23:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39815,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Oracle Park",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-13T23:20:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:20:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "San Diego Padres",
"home": "San Francisco Giants"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWLWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 19,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 18
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 25,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 31
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 66,
"home": 67
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.