San Francisco GiantsvsSan Diego Padres
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
San Diego Padres 4/5 models |
over 2/5 models |
San Diego Padres 2/5 models |
San Diego Padres 3/4 models |
over 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
San Diego Padres |
52%
Over 7.5 |
56%
San Diego Padres -0.5 |
54%
Over 3.5 |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
San Diego Padres San Diego enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Giants 2W-3L over last 5), a better run differential (-1 vs -6), and stronger offensive...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 7.5 Giants conceded 31 runs across 5 matches (6.2 per game), suggesting a leaky defense or weak pitching staff, while Padres scored 19 in 5 (3.8...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
56%
San Diego Padres -0.5 The Padres' superior recent form (3-2 record vs 2-3) and better run differential justifies a slight road favorite position. Giants' home-fie...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Over 3.5 Early-inning runs are often driven by aggressive early at-bats and starter effectiveness. The Giants conceded 31 runs in 5 games, suggesting...
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
San Diego Padres |
52%
under |
51%
San Diego Padres |
53%
San Diego Padres |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
San Diego Padres Padres roster talent edge persists from training data through 2025. Oracle Park suppresses offense but favors the stronger away club in this...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
under Oracle Park is a strong pitcher park with wind typically holding runs down. Both clubs average moderate scoring in recent seasons per traini...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
San Diego Padres Run-line value sits with the Padres given overall talent gap. Giants home form has been poor lately in training data. Pitcher-friendly venue...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
San Diego Padres Early innings lean follows full-game talent edge for Padres. Bullpen usage later in games does not affect first-five outcome. Park factors s...
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
San Diego Padres |
52%
Over 8.5 |
51%
San Diego Padres -1.5 |
53%
San Diego Padres |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
San Diego Padres Based solely on the provided recent form, the San Diego Padres have a slightly better record (3W-2L) and a positive run differential compare...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 The San Francisco Giants have been involved in higher-scoring games recently, conceding 31 runs and scoring 25 over their last five matches....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
San Diego Padres -1.5 Given the San Diego Padres' slightly superior recent form and positive run differential, they are more likely to secure a victory by more th...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
San Diego Padres Mirroring the full-game prediction, the San Diego Padres' marginally better recent form suggests they are more likely to establish an early...
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
San Diego Padres |
52%
over |
53%
San Diego Padres |
— |
54%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
San Diego Padres The San Diego Padres have a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups, and their recent form, despite being mixed, shows a higher scoring...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Oracle Park typically plays as a neutral to slightly pitcher-friendly park, but with the wind expected to blow moderately towards center fie...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
San Diego Padres While the head-to-head suggests a close game, the Padres' recent form and slightly better offensive output give them a narrow advantage. The...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
54%
over Both starting pitchers, Darvish and Webb, can be prone to giving up early runs when they are not at their best. The early game environment a...
3 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
San Francisco Giants |
52%
over |
42%
San Francisco Giants -1.5 |
51%
San Diego Padres |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
San Francisco Giants Training knowledge through 2025-09 indicates the Giants' lineup is potent at Oracle Park, and despite their recent form, they outscore oppon...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have combined for 19 and 25 runs in their last five, suggesting moderate scoring. Wind forecasts from typical September evenings...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
42%
San Francisco Giants -1.5 The Giants are likely to win by one or two runs in a low-scoring affair. However, given the Padres' resilience and the tight NBA-like margin...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
San Diego Padres Padres have started games well recently, with their starting pitching holding the first five innings. Giants often rely on late-game rallies...
First five innings o4.5
?
First five innings o4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusSan Diego Padres 4/5
San Diego enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Giants 2W-3L over last 5), a better run differential (-1 vs -6), and stronger offensive...
Padres roster talent edge persists from training data through 2025. Oracle Park suppresses offense but favors the stronger away club in this...
Based solely on the provided recent form, the San Diego Padres have a slightly better record (3W-2L) and a positive run differential compare...
The San Diego Padres have a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups, and their recent form, despite being mixed, shows a higher scoring...
Training knowledge through 2025-09 indicates the Giants' lineup is potent at Oracle Park, and despite their recent form, they outscore oppon...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/5
Giants conceded 31 runs across 5 matches (6.2 per game), suggesting a leaky defense or weak pitching staff, while Padres scored 19 in 5 (3.8...
Oracle Park is a strong pitcher park with wind typically holding runs down. Both clubs average moderate scoring in recent seasons per traini...
The San Francisco Giants have been involved in higher-scoring games recently, conceding 31 runs and scoring 25 over their last five matches....
Oracle Park typically plays as a neutral to slightly pitcher-friendly park, but with the wind expected to blow moderately towards center fie...
Both teams have combined for 19 and 25 runs in their last five, suggesting moderate scoring. Wind forecasts from typical September evenings...
Spread
ConsensusSan Diego Padres 2/5
The Padres' superior recent form (3-2 record vs 2-3) and better run differential justifies a slight road favorite position. Giants' home-fie...
Run-line value sits with the Padres given overall talent gap. Giants home form has been poor lately in training data. Pitcher-friendly venue...
Given the San Diego Padres' slightly superior recent form and positive run differential, they are more likely to secure a victory by more th...
While the head-to-head suggests a close game, the Padres' recent form and slightly better offensive output give them a narrow advantage. The...
The Giants are likely to win by one or two runs in a low-scoring affair. However, given the Padres' resilience and the tight NBA-like margin...
First 5 innings
ConsensusSan Diego Padres 3/4
Early-inning runs are often driven by aggressive early at-bats and starter effectiveness. The Giants conceded 31 runs in 5 games, suggesting...
Early innings lean follows full-game talent edge for Padres. Bullpen usage later in games does not affect first-five outcome. Park factors s...
Mirroring the full-game prediction, the San Diego Padres' marginally better recent form suggests they are more likely to establish an early...
Padres have started games well recently, with their starting pitching holding the first five innings. Giants often rely on late-game rallies...
First five innings o4.5
Consensusover 1/1
Both starting pitchers, Darvish and Webb, can be prone to giving up early runs when they are not at their best. The early game environment a...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
San Diego Padres
Gemini 2.5 Flash
San Diego Padres
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
San Diego Padres
DeepSeek V3
San Francisco Giants
Grok 4 Fast
San Diego Padres
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c4517b727266892c…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 12 · 02:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39464,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Oracle Park",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-12T02:15:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 12 Sep 2026 02:15:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "San Diego Padres",
"home": "San Francisco Giants"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWLWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 19,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 18
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 25,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 31
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 65,
"home": 65
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.