San Francisco GiantsvsAthletics
San Francisco Giants 2–1 Athletics
All 7 AIs backed San Francisco Giants — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- San Francisco Giants 7/7
- Correct calls
- 7/7
- Final
- 2–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
4 markets · 7 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
San Francisco Giants 4/7 models |
over 4/7 models |
San Francisco Giants 6/7 models |
San Francisco Giants 7/7 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
San Francisco Giants
L
|
54%
Over 8.5 |
56%
Under 4.5 |
58%
San Francisco Giants
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
San Francisco Giants The Giants hold a modest structural advantage at home but -1.5 is a tight spread that reflects competitive balance. Without current 2026 inj...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 8.5 MLB games in late June typically feature full rosters and warmer weather, both conducive to increased run-scoring. The Giants and Athletics...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Under 4.5 Early-inning scoring is typically suppressed compared to full-game totals due to fewer plate appearances and cooler bats. A typical MLB firs...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
San Francisco Giants The Giants are a playoff-caliber franchise with stronger organizational depth and recent winning history compared to the Athletics, who have... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
52%
San Francisco Giants
L
|
55%
over
L
|
52%
San Francisco Giants |
58%
San Francisco Giants
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
San Francisco Giants A -1.5 run-line (Giants -1.5) is a modest cover requirement; Roupp's ability to eat quality innings and a home bullpen match-up give the Gia...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Book aggregates show an O/U around 8.0; Springs' 5.5 ERA and Roupp's modest HR/BB profile point to the possibility of multiple early runs, a...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
San Francisco Giants First-five innings lean Giants because Roupp typically eats early innings and suppresses big rallies better than Springs has this season; Sp...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
San Francisco Giants Matchup favors the Giants at Oracle Park because Landen Roupp has been the more effective starter relative to Jeffrey Springs this year and...
🔍 researched
7 sources cited
|
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
60%
San Francisco Giants |
55%
over
W
|
55%
San Francisco Giants |
60%
San Francisco Giants
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
San Francisco Giants The Giants' home advantage and the Athletics' slightly lower away performance suggest the Giants are more likely to cover a -1 spread. ([the...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Athletics averaging 4.4 runs per game and the Giants averaging 4.1 runs per game. Giv...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
San Francisco Giants The Giants' home-field advantage and the Athletics' away performance suggest the Giants are more likely to lead after the first five innings...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
San Francisco Giants The San Francisco Giants have a strong home-field advantage at Oracle Park, with a home record of 12-16. The Athletics have a slightly bette...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
51%
San Francisco Giants -1.5
L
|
52%
over |
53%
San Francisco Giants |
54%
San Francisco Giants
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
San Francisco Giants -1.5 San Francisco's starters have historically kept games within a run or two against Oakland. The Athletics lineup lacks consistent power to ov...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Athletics games have trended slightly over the total in 2025 when facing NL West opponents. Mild summer conditions in the Bay Area usually a...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
San Francisco Giants Giants benefit from home-field advantage and familiarity with their own starters in the opening innings. Oakland's early offense has been in...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
San Francisco Giants Giants hold a slight edge at home against a rebuilding Athletics club. Training data through 2025 shows San Francisco's pitching staff typic... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
San Francisco Giants -1.5
L
|
52%
Over 8.5
L
|
58%
San Francisco Giants |
60%
San Francisco Giants
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
San Francisco Giants -1.5 Given the general historical edge of the Giants in head-to-head matchups against the Athletics, it's reasonable to expect them to win by mor...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Without specific pitcher information for this future game, predicting totals is challenging. However, interleague Bay Area games can sometim...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
San Francisco Giants The first five innings often heavily depend on the starting pitchers. Assuming the Giants, as the historically stronger team, would likely f...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
San Francisco Giants Based on general historical team strength and typical roster construction up to my last training data update, the San Francisco Giants usual... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
San Francisco Giants
L
|
60%
over |
62%
San Francisco Giants |
65%
San Francisco Giants
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
San Francisco Giants Given the slight favoritism towards the Giants in the head-to-head market and assuming their typical performance level, they are more likely...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Without specific information on starting pitchers, ballpark factors, or recent team offensive/defensive trends, predicting totals is specula...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
62%
San Francisco Giants The Giants are expected to start stronger in the early innings due to their general superiority. This prediction is based on the assumption...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
San Francisco Giants Based on training data, the San Francisco Giants generally perform better than the Athletics in head-to-head matchups and overall season per... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
45%
San Francisco Giants -1.5
L
|
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
San Francisco Giants |
55%
San Francisco Giants
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
San Francisco Giants -1.5 Giants have not been consistent winners by multiple runs. Athletics are competitive in close games. Spread requires a two-run margin which i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both bullpens are suspect and offenses capable of scoring. Historical averages for these teams suggest total around 9 runs. Pitching matchup...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
San Francisco Giants Giants often score early at home, but Athletics' starters have been effective early in games. Slight edge to Giants in first five based on h...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
San Francisco Giants Giants have strong home record and deeper pitching rotation, but Athletics have shown improvement under new management. Recent head-to-head... |
|||||
Spread
ConsensusSan Francisco Giants 4/7
The Giants hold a modest structural advantage at home but -1.5 is a tight spread that reflects competitive balance. Without current 2026 inj...
A -1.5 run-line (Giants -1.5) is a modest cover requirement; Roupp's ability to eat quality innings and a home bullpen match-up give the Gia...
The Giants' home advantage and the Athletics' slightly lower away performance suggest the Giants are more likely to cover a -1 spread. ([the...
San Francisco's starters have historically kept games within a run or two against Oakland. The Athletics lineup lacks consistent power to ov...
Given the general historical edge of the Giants in head-to-head matchups against the Athletics, it's reasonable to expect them to win by mor...
Given the slight favoritism towards the Giants in the head-to-head market and assuming their typical performance level, they are more likely...
Giants have not been consistent winners by multiple runs. Athletics are competitive in close games. Spread requires a two-run margin which i...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/7
MLB games in late June typically feature full rosters and warmer weather, both conducive to increased run-scoring. The Giants and Athletics...
Book aggregates show an O/U around 8.0; Springs' 5.5 ERA and Roupp's modest HR/BB profile point to the possibility of multiple early runs, a...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Athletics averaging 4.4 runs per game and the Giants averaging 4.1 runs per game. Giv...
Athletics games have trended slightly over the total in 2025 when facing NL West opponents. Mild summer conditions in the Bay Area usually a...
Without specific pitcher information for this future game, predicting totals is challenging. However, interleague Bay Area games can sometim...
Without specific information on starting pitchers, ballpark factors, or recent team offensive/defensive trends, predicting totals is specula...
Both bullpens are suspect and offenses capable of scoring. Historical averages for these teams suggest total around 9 runs. Pitching matchup...
First 5 innings
ConsensusSan Francisco Giants 6/7
Early-inning scoring is typically suppressed compared to full-game totals due to fewer plate appearances and cooler bats. A typical MLB firs...
First-five innings lean Giants because Roupp typically eats early innings and suppresses big rallies better than Springs has this season; Sp...
The Giants' home-field advantage and the Athletics' away performance suggest the Giants are more likely to lead after the first five innings...
Giants benefit from home-field advantage and familiarity with their own starters in the opening innings. Oakland's early offense has been in...
The first five innings often heavily depend on the starting pitchers. Assuming the Giants, as the historically stronger team, would likely f...
The Giants are expected to start stronger in the early innings due to their general superiority. This prediction is based on the assumption...
Giants often score early at home, but Athletics' starters have been effective early in games. Slight edge to Giants in first five based on h...
Match winner
ConsensusSan Francisco Giants 7/7
The Giants are a playoff-caliber franchise with stronger organizational depth and recent winning history compared to the Athletics, who have...
Matchup favors the Giants at Oracle Park because Landen Roupp has been the more effective starter relative to Jeffrey Springs this year and...
The San Francisco Giants have a strong home-field advantage at Oracle Park, with a home record of 12-16. The Athletics have a slightly bette...
Giants hold a slight edge at home against a rebuilding Athletics club. Training data through 2025 shows San Francisco's pitching staff typic...
Based on general historical team strength and typical roster construction up to my last training data update, the San Francisco Giants usual...
Based on training data, the San Francisco Giants generally perform better than the Athletics in head-to-head matchups and overall season per...
Giants have strong home record and deeper pitching rotation, but Athletics have shown improvement under new management. Recent head-to-head...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
San Francisco Giants
GPT-4o Mini
San Francisco Giants
Gemini 2.5 Flash
San Francisco Giants
Claude Haiku 4.5
San Francisco Giants
GPT-5 Mini
San Francisco Giants
DeepSeek V3
San Francisco Giants
Grok 4 Fast
San Francisco Giants
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c3837a2062faa588…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Jun 25 · 01:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 6058,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-25T01:45:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 25 Jun 2026 01:45:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Athletics",
"home": "San Francisco Giants"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-21T05:58:23+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
32 tool calls · 7 sources
7 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.