Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Petco Park
Upcoming · in 89h 11m
San Diego Padres logo

San Diego PadresvsPittsburgh Pirates

Pittsburgh Pirates logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
San Diego Padres -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% San Diego Padres -1.5

The Padres' home-field advantage and Petco Park's pitcher-friendly profile create a structural edge. While both teams are evenly matched on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 53% San Diego Padres -1.5

Given San Diego's home-offense depth (projected lineup includes Tatis, Machado, Bogaerts) and better recent form combined with the likelihoo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% San Diego Padres

The Padres' home advantage and superior starting pitcher give them the edge to cover the -1 spread. The Pirates' recent road struggles furth...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% home_ -1.5

Home field and park factors give Padres a slight edge on the run line. Recent form is even but road teams struggle to cover at Petco. Traini...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% San Diego Padres -1.5

Building on the home-field advantage and the pitcher-friendly nature of Petco Park, the San Diego Padres are well-positioned to win by more...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Pittsburgh Pirates

Given the slight underdog status of the Pittsburgh Pirates (+1.5 on the spread), and the potential for a close game influenced by pitching,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% San Diego Padres

The Padres have a superior lineup and home-field edge, making them likely to win by at least two runs. The Pirates' bullpen has been shaky,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
San Diego Padres 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Under 3.5

First-five-inning totals at Petco Park are typically suppressed even more than full-game totals due to pitcher dominance in early innings an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% San Diego Padres

First-five outcomes hinge on the unnamed starting pitchers; since probable starters were not posted on aggregated lists and team pages at re...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% San Diego Padres

The Padres' starting pitcher has been effective early in games, and their home advantage suggests they will lead after the first five inning...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% San Diego Padres

Early innings favor the home starter in neutral park conditions. Both lineups are balanced per provided context. Training data through 2025-...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% San Diego Padres F5I

The initial innings heavily rely on the starting pitchers, and the Padres typically have an advantage when playing at home in Petco Park. Th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 57% Pittsburgh Pirates

The Pirates have shown a tendency to start games strong recently, and with Johan Oviedo on the mound, they have a chance to keep it close or...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% San Diego Padres

The Padres' starting pitcher is expected to outperform the Pirates' starter, giving them an edge early. San Diego's offense generally starts...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
under 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Under 7.5

Petco Park is one of MLB's most restrictive venues for run production, with a large foul territory and favorable dimensions for pitchers. De...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% under 8.5

Petco Park evening conditions (cool, light winds) historically suppress run-scoring and both weather sources show low wind and moderate temp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown inconsistent offensive performances recently, but the Padres' home advantage and the Pirates' struggles on the road su...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% under

Petco Park suppresses scoring due to deep outfield dimensions. Both clubs average modest run totals in recent samples. Training data through...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Under 8.5 runs

Petco Park's characteristics as a pitcher-friendly ballpark typically suppress offensive output and contribute to lower-scoring games. The P...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% under

The over/under is set at 8.5, which seems high given the strong pitching matchup and the pitcher-friendly nature of Petco Park. Sandy Alcánt...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over

Both offenses have shown signs of life recently, and Petco Park in August typically plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly. The starters...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
San Diego Padres 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% San Diego Padres

San Diego plays at home in Petco Park, a pitcher-friendly venue with a large foul territory that suppresses run totals. Both teams show iden...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% San Diego Padres

Padres have the clearer recent run-differential and form edge and are at home in Petco Park, which suppresses scoring—TimeAndDate and AccuWe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% San Diego Padres

The San Diego Padres have a strong home record and have been performing well recently, while the Pittsburgh Pirates have struggled on the ro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% San Diego Padres

Padres hold home advantage at pitcher-friendly Petco Park. Both teams show identical 3-2 form in the provided context. Training data through...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% San Diego Padres

The San Diego Padres generally benefit from a strong home-field advantage at Petco Park, which is known to be a pitcher-friendly environment...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 61% Pittsburgh Pirates

The San Diego Padres are favored due to a stronger starting pitcher in Sandy Alcántara compared to Johan Oviedo, who has shown inconsistency...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% San Diego Padres

Training data through 2025-09: Padres have a stronger roster and home advantage at Petco, while the Pirates are in a rebuilding phase. The s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Pittsburgh Pirates

61
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

San Diego Padres

60
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

San Diego Padres

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

San Diego Padres

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

San Diego Padres

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

San Diego Padres

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

San Diego Padres

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1151–929 · 55%
-732.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 694–590 · 54%
-369.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1228–1245 · 50%
-1,059.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 851–876 · 49%
-634.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1225–1281 · 49%
-972.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 977–1065 · 48%
-863.8u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: d21ce7450ac4b07c…
Kickoff
Tue, Aug 25 · 01:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 28398,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Petco Park",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-25T01:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 01:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Pittsburgh Pirates",
        "home": "San Diego Padres"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWWWL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 35,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 22
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWLWL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 19,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 18
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 47,
            "home": 46
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →