Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Petco Park
Upcoming · in 90h 46m
San Diego Padres logo

San Diego PadresvsMilwaukee Brewers

Milwaukee Brewers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Milwaukee Brewers 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Milwaukee Brewers

Milwaukee enters on a four-game win streak (4W-1L over last 5) with superior recent form, outscoring opponents 22-15 in that span. San Diego...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Milwaukee Brewers

With the game at pitcher-friendly Petco Park (2026 park-factor ~0.94) and both clubs roughly similarly rested, the Brewers' recent form (str...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Milwaukee Brewers

The Brewers have a superior record (66-40) compared to the Padres (53-53) and have been in better form recently, winning 4 of their last 5 g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% San Diego Padres

Training data through 2025-09 shows Padres with slight home edge at Petco Park against similar opponents. Brewers recent form strong but roa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Milwaukee Brewers

This prediction is based on general team trends from my training data prior to 2026-08-11, as specific game details are unavailable. The Bre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Milwaukee Brewers

The Milwaukee Brewers have a slightly better recent form than the San Diego Padres, with a more dominant winning streak in their last 5 game...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Milwaukee Brewers

Based on training data through 2025-09, the Brewers had a strong season with a solid lineup and pitching staff. The Padres are competitive b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Milwaukee Brewers -1.5

Milwaukee's four-game win streak and superior offensive output (22 runs in 5 games) support a narrow spread edge despite playing on the road...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% away_cover

Given the low-run environment at Petco and Brewers' positive short-term form, the Brewers are more likely to avoid a multi-run loss (i.e., t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Milwaukee Brewers

Given the Brewers' superior record and recent form, they are likely to cover a -1 spread. Their strong pitching staff and offensive capabili...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% San Diego Padres

Training data through 2025-09 gives Padres narrow home advantage in run differential. Brewers away splits show vulnerability to spread outco...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Milwaukee Brewers -1.5

Given the Brewers' stronger recent form and offensive output, they are marginally favored to win this game by more than one run. While close...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Milwaukee Brewers

Given the Brewers' slightly better recent form and their ability to score runs, they have a reasonable chance of winning by more than 1.5 ru...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 48% Milwaukee Brewers -1.5

The run line is a close call. The Brewers have the better recent form, but covering a 1.5-run spread on the road is tough. Without current p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings 3.5

Consensus
Over 3.5 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 51% Over 3.5

Early innings depend heavily on starting pitchers, but without current form I can't favor under strongly. Both teams average over 4 runs per...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Under

Petco Park is one of MLB's most pitcher-friendly stadiums with large outfield dimensions and a suppressive effect on home runs. Both teams'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 65% under

Petco Park is a consistent run suppressor in 2026 and the evening forecast suggests cool conditions that reduce flyball carry; that material...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown the ability to score runs, with the Brewers averaging 5.2 runs per game and the Padres averaging 4.2 runs per game. Th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% under

Training data through 2025-09 indicates Petco Park suppresses scoring especially in August. Both teams show moderate run totals recently but...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Under 8.5

Based on my training data and general knowledge, Petco Park tends to suppress offense, leading to lower scoring games. The combined average...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede a significant number of runs in their recent games. The average runs scored by the Bre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Petco Park historically suppresses runs, but both teams have averaged around 4-5 runs per game recently. Starting pitching quality is uncert...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Milwaukee Brewers 3/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 59% Under 4.5

Petco Park's pitcher-friendly profile extends to early-game scoring, particularly in August when marine-layer conditions are most pronounced...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Milwaukee Brewers

First-five outcomes are tightly tied to the starting-pitcher matchup; with probables not finalized at time of research there's added varianc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Milwaukee Brewers

The Brewers' strong starting pitching and offensive lineup suggest they will have the lead after the first five innings. Their recent form a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% San Diego Padres

Training data through 2025-09 shows early innings at Petco often favor home pitching. Lineup handedness and rest factors lean slightly home....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Milwaukee Brewers

Assuming starting pitchers are relatively even, the Brewers' stronger recent offensive performance and overall team form from my training da...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

First five innings over 4.5

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 57% over

The early innings often set the tone for games, and both teams' recent offensive trends suggest they can put runs on the board early. The Br...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Milwaukee Brewers

65
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Milwaukee Brewers

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Milwaukee Brewers

57
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

San Diego Padres

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Milwaukee Brewers

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Milwaukee Brewers

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Milwaukee Brewers

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 2744b29a81ec6ddd…
Kickoff
Tue, Aug 11 · 01:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 22188,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Petco Park",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-11T01:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 11 Aug 2026 01:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Milwaukee Brewers",
        "home": "San Diego Padres"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWWWW",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 22,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 15
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWLWL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 19,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 18
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 33,
            "home": 32
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →