Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 3–15
San Diego Padres logo

San Diego PadresvsLos Angeles Dodgers

Los Angeles Dodgers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final3–15 Locked 28picks · 18 graded
Recap Consensus called it

San Diego Padres 3–15 Los Angeles Dodgers

All 7 AIs backed Los Angeles Dodgers — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Los Angeles Dodgers 7/7
Correct calls
7/7
Final
3–15

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over 8.5 W

Padres–Dodgers matchups typically feature competitive lineups with combined scoring around 8–9 runs. Late June weather in San Diego is warm...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% under L

Yamamoto's recent ability to pitch deep with low run totals and Petco Park's overall pitcher‑friendly profile make the under more likely tha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% over W

Both teams have potent offenses, and their recent games have seen high-scoring outcomes. This suggests that the total runs in this matchup a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both offenses project above league average with power bats; summer conditions favor scoring. Dodgers bullpen usage patterns often extend gam...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 8.5 Runs W

Both the Dodgers and Padres historically feature potent offenses capable of scoring runs, especially in division matchups. While pitching ca...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over W

Without specific pitching matchups or recent offensive trends, predicting totals is difficult. However, MLB games, especially between two co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% over 8.5

Both lineups rank in top 10 for runs per game, and Pacific coast parks often play hitter-friendly. Historical matchups between these rivals...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Los Angeles Dodgers

Early-inning play often reflects starting pitcher quality and leadoff lineup depth. The Dodgers' consistent offensive starting nine and typi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers

Yamamoto's strong early‑inning metrics and recent streaks of retiring many batters suggest the Dodgers are likely to lead or be tied after f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers have a strong starting lineup and have been effective in the early innings, suggesting they will lead after the first five innin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Los Angeles Dodgers

Dodgers typically deploy their best starters early and hold advantages through five innings. Padres lineup has been slower to heat up. Train...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Los Angeles Dodgers F5 ML

The Dodgers typically boast strong starting pitching and an offense capable of scoring early in games. This historical trend suggests they o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Los Angeles Dodgers

Dodgers have strong starting pitching with solid early-inning stats, while Padres rely on key relievers who enter later. The first five inni...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5 W

The Dodgers' broader roster quality and recent playoff consistency suggest a slight edge in run differential over the Padres. A -1.5 spread...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 54% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5 W

Given Yamamoto's propensity to go deep and limit runs, the Dodgers have a realistic path to a multi‑run win; Vásquez's inconsistency raises...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers W

Given the Dodgers' superior performance and the spread of -1, they are likely to win by at least one run, making them the favored choice.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% away_ -1.5

LA's starting pitching edge supports covering a modest run line on the road. Padres have struggled to hold leads late. Training data through...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5 W

The Dodgers' historical superiority often translates into multi-run victories against division rivals. Their strong offense and deeper roste...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Los Angeles Dodgers W

Given the slight historical edge for the Dodgers and assuming they are the favorites, they are more likely to cover a spread of -1.5. This a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5 W

Dodgers have the bullpen and offense to win by multiple runs, especially if they jump ahead early. Padres will compete but Dodgers' depth sh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings over 4.5

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over

Early game scoring can be influenced by starting pitchers. Assuming average pitching performances from both sides, the first five innings co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Match winner

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Los Angeles Dodgers W

The Dodgers have historically dominated this division matchup and maintain stronger overall roster depth and recent playoff experience. With...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Los Angeles Dodgers W

The starting‑pitcher matchup strongly favors the Dodgers: Yoshinobu Yamamoto has produced multiple long, low‑run starts in June while Randy...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers W

The Los Angeles Dodgers have a strong track record against the San Diego Padres, with a higher win percentage in recent matchups. Additional...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Los Angeles Dodgers W

Dodgers have maintained superior roster depth and pitching in recent seasons per training data through 2025-09. Padres home edge is real but...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Los Angeles Dodgers W

Based on historical team performance and overall roster strength, the Los Angeles Dodgers consistently exhibit an advantage over the San Die...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 65% Los Angeles Dodgers W

Based on training data, the Los Angeles Dodgers generally have a historical edge over the San Diego Padres in head-to-head matchups. While s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Los Angeles Dodgers W

Dodgers have superior offensive firepower and deeper rotation, even as slight underdogs on the road. Padres have strong home form but face a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Los Angeles Dodgers

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Los Angeles Dodgers

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Los Angeles Dodgers

62
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Los Angeles Dodgers

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Los Angeles Dodgers

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Los Angeles Dodgers

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Los Angeles Dodgers

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: b4472d8afa360a3b…
Kickoff
Sun, Jun 28 · 00:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 7526,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-28T00:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Los Angeles Dodgers",
        "home": "San Diego Padres"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWWWL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 20,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 26
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWWWL",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 23,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 13
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 0
        },
        "head_to_head": {
            "recent": [
                "2026-06-27: San Diego Padres 7–1 Los Angeles Dodgers"
            ],
            "matches": 1
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →