Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 5–2
San Diego Padres logo

San Diego PadresvsAtlanta Braves

Atlanta Braves logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final5–2 Locked 28picks · 14 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus missed

San Diego Padres 5–2 Atlanta Braves

4 of 7 AIs leaned Atlanta Braves — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Atlanta Braves 4/7
Correct calls
3/7
Final
5–2

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% San Diego Padres W

The Padres are favored at home in late June, where they typically perform well at Petco Park. The Braves are a strong franchise but travel f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Atlanta Braves L

With Martín Pérez (sub-3.00 ERA on the season) starting for Atlanta and JP Sears just recalled with limited MLB form in 2026, the Braves hav...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Atlanta Braves L

The Atlanta Braves have a superior record (45-21) compared to the San Diego Padres (33-31), indicating a stronger overall performance. Addit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% San Diego Padres W

Both clubs are competitive on paper but Padres hold slight home edge. Training data through 2025-09 shows no dominant recent edge either way...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Atlanta Braves L

Based on general knowledge of these franchises' performance trends up to my last training update, the Atlanta Braves typically possess a str...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Atlanta Braves L

Based on general MLB team performance trends and the typical strengths of the Braves compared to the Padres, the Braves are favored. Without...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% San Diego Padres W

Padres have strong home advantage at Petco Park. Braves are competitive but face a solid Padres rotation. Based on training data through 202...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% San Diego Padres -1.5 W

Home-field advantage and historical Padres strength at Petco Park support a modest spread favoring San Diego. The Braves are competitive but...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% San Diego Padres +1.5 W

Although the Braves are the stronger moneyline side on merit, JP Sears' uncertain MLB form and Petco Park's home advantage make backing the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Atlanta Braves L

The Braves' superior record and recent form suggest they are likely to win by at least one run. While the Padres have home-field advantage,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 49% Padres -1.5

Run-line pricing usually gives away slight value to the plus side. Training data through 2025-09 shows Padres marginally better at home but...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 42% Atlanta Braves -1.5 L

Building on the H2H assessment, if the Atlanta Braves are slightly favored to win, they also have a reasonable chance to win by more than on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Atlanta Braves

Given the slight edge to the Braves in head-to-head predictions, they are also favored to cover a small spread. This assumes a typical sprea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 30% San Diego Padres -1.5 W

Padres are favored but not by a large margin. Winning by 2+ is less probable given typical game outcomes. Braves likely keep it close.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 8.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5

Late June MLB games typically feature moderate scoring. Both the Padres and Braves have capable offenses and reasonable pitching depth, sugg...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% under 7.5

Petco Park is generally pitcher-friendly and the forecasted conditions are mild with light wind, reducing carry. Martín Pérez is an establis...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have potent offenses, with the Braves averaging 5.3 runs per game and the Padres averaging 3.9 runs per game. Given these offensi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over_9

Typical MLB scoring environment favors slight lean to over. Training data through 2025-09 indicates average run totals near 9. No weather or...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over 8.5 L

Given the general offensive capabilities often exhibited by both the Atlanta Braves and the San Diego Padres based on my training data, a ga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

MLB games, on average, tend to have a moderate number of runs scored. Without specific pitching matchups or park factors, predicting slightl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both offenses are capable, and Petco Park typically suppresses runs slightly. However, predicted total near 8.5, slight lean over due to qua...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% San Diego Padres

Early-inning play often favors the home team due to focus and fresh pitch counts. The Padres' home advantage should manifest in the first fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Atlanta Braves

Martín Pérez's recent form and career profile suggest he will keep the Braves competitive through the early innings, while JP Sears is a rec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' strong offense and pitching staff are likely to establish an early lead in the first five innings. Their consistent performance...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Padres

Early-inning edges tend to mirror full-game home advantage. Training data through 2025-09 offers no granular first-five splits, defaulting t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' general strength suggests they are likely to perform better than the Padres in the early stages of the game. This prediction is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% San Diego Padres

Padres' starting pitchers are generally strong, and early innings at home favor them. Braves' offense can strike early but slight edge to Sa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings h2h

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Atlanta Braves

The First Five Innings market heavily relies on the strength of the starting pitchers. Without specific pitcher names, I will apply the same...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Atlanta Braves

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Atlanta Braves

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Atlanta Braves

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

San Diego Padres

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Atlanta Braves

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

San Diego Padres

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

San Diego Padres

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1032–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: b75fa6963e109425…
Kickoff
Thu, Jun 25 · 00:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 6051,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-25T00:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Atlanta Braves",
        "home": "San Diego Padres"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-21T05:56:42+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →