Ryan GarnervsMichael Magnesi
MMAI predictions
4 markets · 7 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
book: Ryan Garner 77% |
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
|
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
|
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Ryan Garner 7/7 models |
Decision 4/7 models |
Yes 3/7 models |
10-12 2/7 models |
|
| Bookmaker line | Ryan Garner 77% | — | — | — | |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
73%
Ryan Garner
~1.30
|
62%
Decision |
68%
Yes |
55%
10-12 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
73%
Ryan Garner Market consensus strongly favours Garner (1.20–1.30 across multiple books), indicating a clear favourite with implied win probability around...
Odds: 1.30
Edge: -3.9%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
62%
Decision No market data provided for method of finish, so I predict based on typical boxing outcomes. Given that both fighters are backed at decisive...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
68%
Yes Based on the emphasis on decisions in the h2h market and typical boxing dynamics, the fight is more likely to reach a full decision than end...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
10-12 Without specific fight card information, round length, or knockout history, I assume a standard 12-round professional bout. Given that decis... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
74%
Ryan Garner
~1.30
|
55%
Decision |
62%
Yes |
50%
10-12 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
74%
Ryan Garner Garner arrives undefeated (19-0, 10 KOs) with recent momentum and the fight is in his home city area (St Mary's, Southampton), while Magnesi...
Odds: 1.30
Edge: -2.9%
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
55%
Decision Multiple previews and bookmakers forecast a Garner win by decision and the matchup features two orthodox fighters with similar KO ratios, ma...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
62%
Yes Given previews leaning to a Garner decision, both fighters' modest KO rates at this level and Garner's propensity to work at a high tempo, t...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
50%
10-12 If the expected result is a Garner decision, the fight is most likely to be decided across the championship distance with the decisive verdi...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
|
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
85%
Ryan Garner
~1.30
|
75%
KO/TKO |
80%
no |
70%
1-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Ryan Garner Ryan Garner enters the bout with an undefeated record of 19-0, including a recent third-round stoppage of Cristian Bielma in March 2026. ([e...
Odds: 1.30
Edge: +8.1%
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
75%
KO/TKO Garner has demonstrated knockout power with 10 KOs in his 19 wins, while Magnesi has been stopped in both of his losses, including a dramati...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
80%
no Both fighters have a history of stoppage victories and losses, indicating a strong possibility of the fight ending before the final bell. ([...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
70%
1-3 Garner's recent stoppage win in the third round and Magnesi's history of being stopped in late rounds suggest the fight may conclude in the...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Ryan Garner
~1.30
|
55%
KO/TKO |
58%
No |
35%
7-9 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Ryan Garner Ryan Garner enters as the clear favorite per all available bookmaker lines. No public information exists on this 2026 matchup beyond trainin...
Odds: 1.30
Edge: +1.1%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
55%
KO/TKO Both fighters have shown finishing ability in recent bouts captured in training data. Garner's power advantage suggests a stoppage is slight...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
58%
No Garner's aggressive style and knockout ratio point to an early finish more often than not. The wide odds gap also implies bookmakers expect...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
35%
7-9 Mid-to-late fight stoppages align with Garner's typical pattern against mid-tier opposition. Early finishes remain possible but less probabl... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
78%
Ryan Garner
~1.30
|
55%
Ryan Garner by KO/TKO/DQ |
65%
No |
20%
Ryan Garner by KO/TKO/DQ Rounds 7-9 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Ryan Garner Based on my training data through early 2023, Ryan Garner is a highly-touted and aggressive prospect with significant power, consistently pe...
Odds: 1.30
Edge: +1.1%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
55%
Ryan Garner by KO/TKO/DQ My training data indicates Ryan Garner has a high knockout ratio and his aggressive style often leads to stoppages. While Michael Magnesi is...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
65%
No Given Ryan Garner's aggressive style and significant punching power, a stoppage victory is a strong possibility. Although Michael Magnesi is...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
20%
Ryan Garner by KO/TKO/DQ Rounds 7-9 Based on my training data, Ryan Garner is an aggressive fighter but Michael Magnesi's known durability suggests he can absorb early pressure... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Ryan Garner
~1.30
|
55%
Decision |
60%
Yes |
30%
4-6 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Ryan Garner Ryan Garner is undefeated with 13 wins, while Michael Magnesi has one loss on his record. Garner's recent form and undefeated status make hi...
Odds: 1.30
Edge: +8.1%
2 sources cited
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
55%
Decision While Garner is undefeated and Magnesi has a loss, neither fighter has an exceptionally high knockout rate in their combined records. Garner...
2 sources cited
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
60%
Yes Given the analysis for 'method_finish', the fighters' records suggest a higher probability of this bout going to a decision. While both poss...
2 sources cited
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
30%
4-6 This is a difficult market to predict without more specific fighter data or fight tendencies. However, considering Garner's relatively early...
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
75%
Ryan Garner
~1.30
|
60%
Decision |
35%
No |
50%
Rounds 7-12 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Ryan Garner Ryan Garner is undefeated at 16-0 and fighting in his home country, while Magnesi has three losses and is the older fighter. Garner's superi...
Odds: 1.30
Edge: -1.9%
2 sources cited
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
60%
Decision Both fighters have moderate knockout percentages (Garner 56%, Magnesi 57%) but often go the distance against tough opposition. Magnesi has b...
2 sources cited
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
35%
No Garner has gone the distance in 7 of 16 fights, while Magnesi has gone the distance in 13 of 26, showing a tendency for decisions. Given bot...
2 sources cited
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
50%
Rounds 7-12 Given the consensus for a decision, the fight likely goes into the later rounds. Garner's advantage should grow over time, but he is unlikel...
2 sources cited
|
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusRyan Garner 7/7
Market consensus strongly favours Garner (1.20–1.30 across multiple books), indicating a clear favourite with implied win probability around...
Garner arrives undefeated (19-0, 10 KOs) with recent momentum and the fight is in his home city area (St Mary's, Southampton), while Magnesi...
Ryan Garner enters the bout with an undefeated record of 19-0, including a recent third-round stoppage of Cristian Bielma in March 2026. ([e...
Ryan Garner enters as the clear favorite per all available bookmaker lines. No public information exists on this 2026 matchup beyond trainin...
Based on my training data through early 2023, Ryan Garner is a highly-touted and aggressive prospect with significant power, consistently pe...
Ryan Garner is undefeated with 13 wins, while Michael Magnesi has one loss on his record. Garner's recent form and undefeated status make hi...
Ryan Garner is undefeated at 16-0 and fighting in his home country, while Magnesi has three losses and is the older fighter. Garner's superi...
Bookmaker line: Ryan Garner 77%
Method of victory
ConsensusDecision 4/7
No market data provided for method of finish, so I predict based on typical boxing outcomes. Given that both fighters are backed at decisive...
Multiple previews and bookmakers forecast a Garner win by decision and the matchup features two orthodox fighters with similar KO ratios, ma...
Garner has demonstrated knockout power with 10 KOs in his 19 wins, while Magnesi has been stopped in both of his losses, including a dramati...
Both fighters have shown finishing ability in recent bouts captured in training data. Garner's power advantage suggests a stoppage is slight...
My training data indicates Ryan Garner has a high knockout ratio and his aggressive style often leads to stoppages. While Michael Magnesi is...
While Garner is undefeated and Magnesi has a loss, neither fighter has an exceptionally high knockout rate in their combined records. Garner...
Both fighters have moderate knockout percentages (Garner 56%, Magnesi 57%) but often go the distance against tough opposition. Magnesi has b...
Goes the distance
ConsensusYes 3/7
Based on the emphasis on decisions in the h2h market and typical boxing dynamics, the fight is more likely to reach a full decision than end...
Given previews leaning to a Garner decision, both fighters' modest KO rates at this level and Garner's propensity to work at a high tempo, t...
Both fighters have a history of stoppage victories and losses, indicating a strong possibility of the fight ending before the final bell. ([...
Garner's aggressive style and knockout ratio point to an early finish more often than not. The wide odds gap also implies bookmakers expect...
Given Ryan Garner's aggressive style and significant punching power, a stoppage victory is a strong possibility. Although Michael Magnesi is...
Given the analysis for 'method_finish', the fighters' records suggest a higher probability of this bout going to a decision. While both poss...
Garner has gone the distance in 7 of 16 fights, while Magnesi has gone the distance in 13 of 26, showing a tendency for decisions. Given bot...
Round group
Consensus10-12 2/7
Without specific fight card information, round length, or knockout history, I assume a standard 12-round professional bout. Given that decis...
If the expected result is a Garner decision, the fight is most likely to be decided across the championship distance with the decisive verdi...
Garner's recent stoppage win in the third round and Magnesi's history of being stopped in late rounds suggest the fight may conclude in the...
Mid-to-late fight stoppages align with Garner's typical pattern against mid-tier opposition. Early finishes remain possible but less probabl...
Based on my training data, Ryan Garner is an aggressive fighter but Michael Magnesi's known durability suggests he can absorb early pressure...
This is a difficult market to predict without more specific fighter data or fight tendencies. However, considering Garner's relatively early...
Given the consensus for a decision, the fight likely goes into the later rounds. Garner's advantage should grow over time, but he is unlikel...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Ryan Garner
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ryan Garner
Grok 4 Fast
Ryan Garner
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Ryan Garner
DeepSeek V3
Ryan Garner
GPT-5 Mini
Ryan Garner
Claude Haiku 4.5
Ryan Garner
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Bookmaker odds
24 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted
| Book | Ryan Garner | Draw | Michael Magnesi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanduel | 1.23 | — | 4.00 |
| Betmgm | 1.20 | — | 4.33 |
| Betfair Exchange UK | 1.16 | 5.00 | 4.80 |
| Betfair Exchange EU | 1.16 | 5.00 | 4.80 |
| BetOnline | 1.15 | — | 5.16 |
| Betrivers | 1.21 | — | 4.20 |
| Betsson | 1.21 | — | 3.95 |
| Betus | 1.17 | — | 5.00 |
| Coral | 1.22 | 19.00 | 4.50 |
| Grosvenor | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| Leovegas | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| Leovegas Se | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| Livescorebet | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| LowVig | 1.18 | — | 4.66 |
| Nordicbet | 1.21 | — | 3.95 |
| Onexbet | 1.20 | 33.00 | 4.70 |
| Paddy Power | 1.25 | 17.00 | 4.20 |
| Pmu | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| Sport888 | 1.30 | 13.00 | 4.10 |
| Unibet Nl | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| Unibet Se | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| Unibet | 1.17 | — | 4.50 |
| Virginbet | 1.24 | 19.00 | 4.25 |
| Winamax | 1.14 | — | 3.80 |
| Book | Line | Over | Under |
|---|
| Book | Ryan Garner | Michael Magnesi |
|---|
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
7b9e4e2329074670…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jun 20 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Method of victory · Goes the distance · Round group
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | method_finish | goes_distance | round_group
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 205,
"sport": "boxing",
"venue": null,
"league": "Boxing",
"starts_at": "2026-06-20T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Michael Magnesi",
"home": "Ryan Garner"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-20T05:45:04+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": {
"away": 5.16,
"draw": 33,
"home": 1.3
},
"note": "Bookmaker consensus odds at the moment of the call. Frozen here so settlement grades against the same line.",
"extra_markets": {
"h2h": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.2,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.33,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.95,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.95,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.15,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5.16,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.18,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.66,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 17,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.25,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.2,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.22,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.5,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 33,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.2,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.7,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 13,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.3,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.1,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.14,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.8,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.2,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.23,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.17,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.5,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.17,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.16,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.8,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.16,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.8,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.2,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.33,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.95,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.95,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.18,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.66,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.18,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.66,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 17,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.25,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.2,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.22,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.5,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 33,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.2,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.7,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 13,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.3,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.1,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.14,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.8,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.2,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.23,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.17,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.5,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.17,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 19,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.25,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
}
],
"h2h_lay": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1000,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.28,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1000,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1000,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.28,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1000,
"outcome": "Michael Magnesi"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1000,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.28,
"outcome": "Ryan Garner"
}
]
}
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"method_finish",
"goes_distance",
"round_group"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
8 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.