Robin MontgomeryvsCarson Branstine
CBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
Robin Montgomery 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Robin Montgomery |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 US Open women's singles matches at this level are best-of-3 sets. At least one set going to a tiebreak or competitive scoreline is more like...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Robin Montgomery Both players are relatively low-ranked or emerging on the professional circuit, making pre-match data sparse. Montgomery, competing at the U... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
under_22.5 |
68%
Robin Montgomery |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_22.5 Hard-court US Open matches between developing players trend lower total games when one dominates serve. Montgomery's edge projects fewer bre...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Robin Montgomery Robin Montgomery holds a higher junior and early pro ranking than Branstine in training data through 2024. On hard courts Montgomery shows s... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Carson Branstine |
65%
Robin Montgomery |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Carson Branstine Based on my training data up to late 2023, Robin Montgomery is typically the stronger player on hard courts. While Carson Branstine is compe...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Robin Montgomery Based on my training data up to late 2023, Robin Montgomery typically possesses a more powerful game and higher ceiling, especially on hard... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Carson Branstine |
65%
Robin Montgomery |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Carson Branstine Given Robin Montgomery's slight edge, I anticipate a match that could go either way but is more likely to be decided in two sets rather than...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Robin Montgomery Based on my training data, Robin Montgomery is generally considered the stronger player between these two. Montgomery has shown a higher win... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Over 2.5 |
55%
Robin Montgomery |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Training data through 2025-09. Their playing styles are likely to produce a competitive match. Montgomery's consistency and Branstine's fire...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Robin Montgomery Training data through 2025-09. Montgomery has shown better hard-court results and consistency at the WTA level, while Branstine has been mor... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
US Open women's singles matches at this level are best-of-3 sets. At least one set going to a tiebreak or competitive scoreline is more like...
Hard-court US Open matches between developing players trend lower total games when one dominates serve. Montgomery's edge projects fewer bre...
Based on my training data up to late 2023, Robin Montgomery is typically the stronger player on hard courts. While Carson Branstine is compe...
Given Robin Montgomery's slight edge, I anticipate a match that could go either way but is more likely to be decided in two sets rather than...
Training data through 2025-09. Their playing styles are likely to produce a competitive match. Montgomery's consistency and Branstine's fire...
Match winner
ConsensusRobin Montgomery 5/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked or emerging on the professional circuit, making pre-match data sparse. Montgomery, competing at the U...
Robin Montgomery holds a higher junior and early pro ranking than Branstine in training data through 2024. On hard courts Montgomery shows s...
Based on my training data up to late 2023, Robin Montgomery typically possesses a more powerful game and higher ceiling, especially on hard...
Based on my training data, Robin Montgomery is generally considered the stronger player between these two. Montgomery has shown a higher win...
Training data through 2025-09. Montgomery has shown better hard-court results and consistency at the WTA level, while Branstine has been mor...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Robin Montgomery
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Robin Montgomery
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Robin Montgomery
Claude Haiku 4.5
Robin Montgomery
DeepSeek V3
Robin Montgomery
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
ca78559f1d48d837…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 15:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31658,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Carson Branstine",
"home": "Robin Montgomery"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.