Renata ZarazuavsAnna Bondar
ABYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/8 models |
Renata Zarazua 3/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
under_2.5 |
58%
Renata Zarazua |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Both players prefer shorter rallies on hard courts leading to quicker sets. Training data shows Bondar often drops early sets without forcin...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Renata Zarazua Zarazua holds a slight edge on hard courts per historical patterns in training data through 2023. Bondar has shown inconsistency against Lat... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Over 2.5 |
53%
Renata Zarazua |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Given the expected closeness of the match between two players who generally prefer clay, and whose hard-court performances are often similar...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Renata Zarazua Based on general career trajectory and hard court adaptability derived from my training data up to its last update, Renata Zarazua is given... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
2.5 |
60%
Anna Bondar |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
2.5 Given Bondar's slight edge and the potential for a competitive match, it's plausible that it could go to three sets. However, if Bondar's do...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Anna Bondar Based on training data, Anna Bondar is generally a stronger player on hard courts compared to Renata Zarazua. Bondar's consistent performanc... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
46%
3 |
56%
Renata Zarazua |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
46%
3 Training data only: two evenly matched, unseeded players with no dominant serve means a high likelihood of at least one break-heavy set. Bon...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Renata Zarazua Training data only (through early 2025): no live access, so this reflects known player profiles plus the home-crowd factor for Mexican Zaraz... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/8
Both players prefer shorter rallies on hard courts leading to quicker sets. Training data shows Bondar often drops early sets without forcin...
Given the expected closeness of the match between two players who generally prefer clay, and whose hard-court performances are often similar...
Given Bondar's slight edge and the potential for a competitive match, it's plausible that it could go to three sets. However, if Bondar's do...
Training data only: two evenly matched, unseeded players with no dominant serve means a high likelihood of at least one break-heavy set. Bon...
Match winner
ConsensusRenata Zarazua 3/4
Zarazua holds a slight edge on hard courts per historical patterns in training data through 2023. Bondar has shown inconsistency against Lat...
Based on general career trajectory and hard court adaptability derived from my training data up to its last update, Renata Zarazua is given...
Based on training data, Anna Bondar is generally a stronger player on hard courts compared to Renata Zarazua. Bondar's consistent performanc...
Training data only (through early 2025): no live access, so this reflects known player profiles plus the home-crowd factor for Mexican Zaraz...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Anna Bondar
Grok 4 Fast
Renata Zarazua
DeepSeek V3
Renata Zarazua
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Renata Zarazua
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
37805ad8aafce169…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 21 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 46437,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Korea Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-21T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 21 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Anna Bondar",
"home": "Renata Zarazua"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.