Polina KudermetovavsKamilla Rakhimova
KRYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Polina Kudermetova 3/4 models |
Over 21.5 2/8 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Polina Kudermetova |
58%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Polina Kudermetova Polina Kudermetova holds a slight edge in recent hard-court results and movement compared to Kamilla Rakhimova based on training data throug...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over_2.5 Both players show competitive sets in hard-court matches from training data through 2025-09, pointing to a likely three-setter. Serve and re... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Kamilla Rakhimova |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Kamilla Rakhimova Kamilla Rakhimova generally possesses a stronger overall game and more extensive WTA tour experience compared to Polina Kudermetova. Her agg...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets While Kamilla Rakhimova is favored, Polina Kudermetova is known for her tenacity and ability to extend rallies, often making matches competi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Polina Kudermetova |
62%
Kamilla Rakhimova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Polina Kudermetova Based on training data, Polina Kudermetova has shown a slightly higher win rate in recent head-to-head matchups and on similar surfaces. Whi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Kamilla Rakhimova Given the closely matched nature of the players indicated by the head-to-head market, it's likely this match will go to three sets. Both pla... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
54%
Polina Kudermetova |
56%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Polina Kudermetova No live data available at build time, so this is based on training knowledge through 2025-09. Both are young Russian hard-court players of s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over 2.5 Both players are closely matched, and the probabilities imply a near 50-50 contest, which historically produces a high rate of three-set WTA... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusPolina Kudermetova 3/4
Polina Kudermetova holds a slight edge in recent hard-court results and movement compared to Kamilla Rakhimova based on training data throug...
Kamilla Rakhimova generally possesses a stronger overall game and more extensive WTA tour experience compared to Polina Kudermetova. Her agg...
Based on training data, Polina Kudermetova has shown a slightly higher win rate in recent head-to-head matchups and on similar surfaces. Whi...
No live data available at build time, so this is based on training knowledge through 2025-09. Both are young Russian hard-court players of s...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 21.5 2/8
Both players show competitive sets in hard-court matches from training data through 2025-09, pointing to a likely three-setter. Serve and re...
While Kamilla Rakhimova is favored, Polina Kudermetova is known for her tenacity and ability to extend rallies, often making matches competi...
Given the closely matched nature of the players indicated by the head-to-head market, it's likely this match will go to three sets. Both pla...
Both players are closely matched, and the probabilities imply a near 50-50 contest, which historically produces a high rate of three-set WTA...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Kamilla Rakhimova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Polina Kudermetova
DeepSeek V3
Polina Kudermetova
Grok 4 Fast
Polina Kudermetova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
1e139a87c979d849…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 21 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 46435,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Korea Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-21T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 21 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kamilla Rakhimova",
"home": "Polina Kudermetova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.