Polina IatcenkovsLucia Bronzetti
LBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Lucia Bronzetti 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Lucia Bronzetti |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Lucia Bronzetti Both players are mid-ranking professionals with limited public profile in my training data through early 2025. Bronzetti has shown more cons...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Without current form data or head-to-head record, I default to the structural likelihood of a competitive US Open match between two ranked p... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Lucia Bronzetti |
68%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Lucia Bronzetti Lucia Bronzetti has established WTA-level experience on hard courts while Polina Iatcenko lacks documented results at this level in training...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under 2.5 Bronzetti is expected to win in straight sets given the talent gap on hard courts. Women's US Open matches often finish quickly when one pla... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Lucia Bronzetti |
70%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Lucia Bronzetti Based on my training data up to my last update, Lucia Bronzetti is a seasoned WTA professional with significant experience in Grand Slam mai...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under 2.5 sets Given Lucia Bronzetti's substantial advantage in experience and expected skill level over Polina Iatcenko, a straight-sets victory for Bronz... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Polina Iatcenko |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Polina Iatcenko Based on my training data, Polina Iatcenko is generally the stronger player on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Iatcenko h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over This is expected to be a competitive match, leaning towards three sets due to the players' similar recent performance levels according to my... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Lucia Bronzetti |
55%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Lucia Bronzetti Based on training data through 2025-09, Bronzetti has a higher WTA ranking and more experience on hard courts, which is the surface at the U...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 sets Given Bronzetti's superiority and the lower-ranked opponent, a straight-sets win is more likely. While upsets happen, the class difference s... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLucia Bronzetti 4/5
Both players are mid-ranking professionals with limited public profile in my training data through early 2025. Bronzetti has shown more cons...
Lucia Bronzetti has established WTA-level experience on hard courts while Polina Iatcenko lacks documented results at this level in training...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Lucia Bronzetti is a seasoned WTA professional with significant experience in Grand Slam mai...
Based on my training data, Polina Iatcenko is generally the stronger player on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Iatcenko h...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Bronzetti has a higher WTA ranking and more experience on hard courts, which is the surface at the U...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Without current form data or head-to-head record, I default to the structural likelihood of a competitive US Open match between two ranked p...
Bronzetti is expected to win in straight sets given the talent gap on hard courts. Women's US Open matches often finish quickly when one pla...
Given Lucia Bronzetti's substantial advantage in experience and expected skill level over Polina Iatcenko, a straight-sets victory for Bronz...
This is expected to be a competitive match, leaning towards three sets due to the players' similar recent performance levels according to my...
Given Bronzetti's superiority and the lower-ranked opponent, a straight-sets win is more likely. While upsets happen, the class difference s...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Lucia Bronzetti
Grok 4 Fast
Lucia Bronzetti
DeepSeek V3
Lucia Bronzetti
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Polina Iatcenko
Claude Haiku 4.5
Lucia Bronzetti
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
107a7c81d7e28b8c…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31118,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lucia Bronzetti",
"home": "Polina Iatcenko"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.