Pittsburgh Pirates vs Seattle Mariners
Kickoff · Wed, Jun 24 · 22:40 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4bec4aee57bd93f0…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Jun 24 · 22:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 5921,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-24T22:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 24 Jun 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Seattle Mariners",
"home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-21T05:52:05+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 |
52%
Under 4.5 |
58%
Seattle Mariners |
54%
Under 8.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 The Mariners, as the road favorite, are likely favored by 1–2 runs in this matchup based on franchise strength and roster depth. A -1.5 spre...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Under 4.5 Early-inning totals tend to be lower than full-game scores, especially when facing quality starting pitchers. Without knowledge of the speci...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Seattle Mariners The Mariners have historically been a stronger franchise with better recent playoff track records and deeper rosters than the Pirates. Witho...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Under 8.5 MLB scoring has trended toward more offense in recent years, but mid-June matchups between mid-tier teams typically settle in the 7–9 run ra... |
|||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
36%
Seattle Mariners |
60%
Seattle Mariners |
58%
Seattle Mariners |
62%
under |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
36%
Seattle Mariners Mariners are favored on the ML but the run-line (-1.5) is a tougher ask: Ashcraft can keep the game close and Pittsburgh at home typically g...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Seattle Mariners Bryan Woo has a strong track record of limiting runs through the first five innings and frequently goes 5+ which makes Seattle favorable in...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Seattle Mariners Probable starters are Bryan Woo for Seattle (season workload and strong first-5/6-innings track record) versus Braxton Ashcraft for Pittsbur...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Both probable starters are run-limiting arms (Woo with consistent length; Ashcraft with a sub-3.5 ERA in his starts) and PNC Park is not an...
🔍 researched
8 sources cited
|
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
60%
over |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Seattle Mariners The Mariners' slight edge in overall performance and recent form suggests they are more likely to cover a -1 spread.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Seattle Mariners The Mariners' recent form and overall performance suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Seattle Mariners The Mariners have a slightly better record and have been performing well recently, suggesting a slight edge over the Pirates.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have been scoring and allowing runs at moderate rates, indicating a likelihood of a total score over 2.5.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
50%
Seattle Mariners |
49%
Seattle Mariners |
52%
Seattle Mariners |
51%
over |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Seattle Mariners Seattle bullpen depth gives narrow run-line value in road games. Pittsburgh offense remains inconsistent. Training data through 2025-09.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
49%
Seattle Mariners Early-inning edges often track season-long starter quality where Mariners hold marginal advantage. No weather or rest data available. Traini...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Seattle Mariners Both teams enter with limited recent data in training cutoff; Mariners hold slight edge from stronger 2024-25 roster construction and pitchi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Typical MLB run environment favors slight lean to overs in warm-weather June games. Both offenses project average or better against opposing... |
|||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
58%
Seattle Mariners |
53%
Under 8.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 Following the H2H prediction, if the Mariners are expected to win, there's a decent chance they win by more than one run, which is common in...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Seattle Mariners The First Five Innings outcome is heavily influenced by the starting pitchers. Given the Mariners' historical strength in developing and acq...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Seattle Mariners Based on my training data up to early 2024, the Seattle Mariners generally project as a more competitive team with stronger pitching compare...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Under 8.5 Assuming both teams field average to good pitching, and considering the Mariners' historical emphasis on pitching and defense, an 'under' pi... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
32%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
58%
Seattle Mariners |
54%
Under 8.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
32%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 While the Mariners are favored to win, covering a -1.5 run line requires a comfortable victory. Baseball games are often close, and the Pira...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Seattle Mariners The first five innings favor the team with stronger starting pitching, which Seattle typically has. The Pirates' offense is weaker early in...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Seattle Mariners Seattle has a stronger overall roster and better pitching depth, while the Pirates are in a rebuilding phase. However, baseball is volatile...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Under 8.5 Both teams have offensively inconsistent lineups and decent pitching, especially Seattle with their strong rotation. The Pirates' offense te... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Seattle Mariners -1.5 3/6 |
Seattle Mariners 5/6 |
Seattle Mariners 6/6 |
Under 8.5 3/6 |
|
Spread
ConsensusSeattle Mariners -1.5 3/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
55%
Seattle Mariners -1.5
The Mariners, as the road favorite, are likely favored by 1–2 runs in this matchup based on franchise strength and roster depth. A -1.5 spre...
GPT-5 Mini
36%
Seattle Mariners
Mariners are favored on the ML but the run-line (-1.5) is a tougher ask: Ashcraft can keep the game close and Pittsburgh at home typically g...
GPT-4o Mini
55%
Seattle Mariners
The Mariners' slight edge in overall performance and recent form suggests they are more likely to cover a -1 spread.
Grok 4 Fast
50%
Seattle Mariners
Seattle bullpen depth gives narrow run-line value in road games. Pittsburgh offense remains inconsistent. Training data through 2025-09.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
52%
Seattle Mariners -1.5
Following the H2H prediction, if the Mariners are expected to win, there's a decent chance they win by more than one run, which is common in...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
—
DeepSeek V3
32%
Seattle Mariners -1.5
While the Mariners are favored to win, covering a -1.5 run line requires a comfortable victory. Baseball games are often close, and the Pira...
First 5 innings
ConsensusSeattle Mariners 5/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
52%
Under 4.5
Early-inning totals tend to be lower than full-game scores, especially when facing quality starting pitchers. Without knowledge of the speci...
GPT-5 Mini
60%
Seattle Mariners
Bryan Woo has a strong track record of limiting runs through the first five innings and frequently goes 5+ which makes Seattle favorable in...
GPT-4o Mini
55%
Seattle Mariners
The Mariners' recent form and overall performance suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings.
Grok 4 Fast
49%
Seattle Mariners
Early-inning edges often track season-long starter quality where Mariners hold marginal advantage. No weather or rest data available. Traini...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Seattle Mariners
The First Five Innings outcome is heavily influenced by the starting pitchers. Given the Mariners' historical strength in developing and acq...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
—
DeepSeek V3
55%
Seattle Mariners
The first five innings favor the team with stronger starting pitching, which Seattle typically has. The Pirates' offense is weaker early in...
Match winner
ConsensusSeattle Mariners 6/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
58%
Seattle Mariners
The Mariners have historically been a stronger franchise with better recent playoff track records and deeper rosters than the Pirates. Witho...
GPT-5 Mini
58%
Seattle Mariners
Probable starters are Bryan Woo for Seattle (season workload and strong first-5/6-innings track record) versus Braxton Ashcraft for Pittsbur...
GPT-4o Mini
55%
Seattle Mariners
The Mariners have a slightly better record and have been performing well recently, suggesting a slight edge over the Pirates.
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Seattle Mariners
Both teams enter with limited recent data in training cutoff; Mariners hold slight edge from stronger 2024-25 roster construction and pitchi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
58%
Seattle Mariners
Based on my training data up to early 2024, the Seattle Mariners generally project as a more competitive team with stronger pitching compare...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
—
DeepSeek V3
58%
Seattle Mariners
Seattle has a stronger overall roster and better pitching depth, while the Pirates are in a rebuilding phase. However, baseball is volatile...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 8.5 3/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
54%
Under 8.5
MLB scoring has trended toward more offense in recent years, but mid-June matchups between mid-tier teams typically settle in the 7–9 run ra...
GPT-5 Mini
62%
under
Both probable starters are run-limiting arms (Woo with consistent length; Ashcraft with a sub-3.5 ERA in his starts) and PNC Park is not an...
GPT-4o Mini
60%
over
Both teams have been scoring and allowing runs at moderate rates, indicating a likelihood of a total score over 2.5.
Grok 4 Fast
51%
over
Typical MLB run environment favors slight lean to overs in warm-weather June games. Both offenses project average or better against opposing...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
53%
Under 8.5
Assuming both teams field average to good pitching, and considering the Mariners' historical emphasis on pitching and defense, an 'under' pi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
—
DeepSeek V3
54%
Under 8.5
Both teams have offensively inconsistent lineups and decent pitching, especially Seattle with their strong rotation. The Pirates' offense te...
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
68 tool calls · 8 sources
8 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.