Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 11–1
Pittsburgh Pirates logo

Pittsburgh PiratesvsSeattle Mariners

Seattle Mariners logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final11–1 Locked 28picks · 19 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Pittsburgh Pirates 11–1 Seattle Mariners

All 7 AIs backed Seattle Mariners — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Seattle Mariners 7/7
Correct calls
0/7
Final
11–1

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Seattle Mariners 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Seattle Mariners L

The Mariners have historically been a stronger franchise with better recent playoff track records and deeper rosters than the Pirates. Witho...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Seattle Mariners L

Probable starters are Bryan Woo for Seattle (season workload and strong first-5/6-innings track record) versus Braxton Ashcraft for Pittsbur...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Seattle Mariners L

The Mariners have a slightly better record and have been performing well recently, suggesting a slight edge over the Pirates.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Seattle Mariners L

Both teams enter with limited recent data in training cutoff; Mariners hold slight edge from stronger 2024-25 roster construction and pitchi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Seattle Mariners L

Based on my training data up to early 2024, the Seattle Mariners generally project as a more competitive team with stronger pitching compare...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Seattle Mariners L

Based on general MLB team performance trends from my training data, the Seattle Mariners tend to have a slight edge over the Pittsburgh Pira...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Seattle Mariners L

Seattle has a stronger overall roster and better pitching depth, while the Pirates are in a rebuilding phase. However, baseball is volatile...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Under 8.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 8.5 L

MLB scoring has trended toward more offense in recent years, but mid-June matchups between mid-tier teams typically settle in the 7–9 run ra...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% under L

Both probable starters are run-limiting arms (Woo with consistent length; Ashcraft with a sub-3.5 ERA in his starts) and PNC Park is not an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have been scoring and allowing runs at moderate rates, indicating a likelihood of a total score over 2.5.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Typical MLB run environment favors slight lean to overs in warm-weather June games. Both offenses project average or better against opposing...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Under 8.5 L

Assuming both teams field average to good pitching, and considering the Mariners' historical emphasis on pitching and defense, an 'under' pi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over W

MLB games, especially between teams of similar historical caliber, often see more than 2.5 runs scored. This is a general tendency observed...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 54% Under 8.5 L

Both teams have offensively inconsistent lineups and decent pitching, especially Seattle with their strong rotation. The Pirates' offense te...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Seattle Mariners 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Seattle Mariners -1.5 L

The Mariners, as the road favorite, are likely favored by 1–2 runs in this matchup based on franchise strength and roster depth. A -1.5 spre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 36% Seattle Mariners L

Mariners are favored on the ML but the run-line (-1.5) is a tougher ask: Ashcraft can keep the game close and Pittsburgh at home typically g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Seattle Mariners L

The Mariners' slight edge in overall performance and recent form suggests they are more likely to cover a -1 spread.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 50% Seattle Mariners

Seattle bullpen depth gives narrow run-line value in road games. Pittsburgh offense remains inconsistent. Training data through 2025-09.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Seattle Mariners -1.5 L

Following the H2H prediction, if the Mariners are expected to win, there's a decent chance they win by more than one run, which is common in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Seattle Mariners L

Given the slight historical advantage for the Mariners, they are marginally favored to cover a spread of -1. This accounts for the potential...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 32% Seattle Mariners -1.5 L

While the Mariners are favored to win, covering a -1.5 run line requires a comfortable victory. Baseball games are often close, and the Pira...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Seattle Mariners 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 4.5

Early-inning totals tend to be lower than full-game scores, especially when facing quality starting pitchers. Without knowledge of the speci...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Seattle Mariners

Bryan Woo has a strong track record of limiting runs through the first five innings and frequently goes 5+ which makes Seattle favorable in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Seattle Mariners

The Mariners' recent form and overall performance suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 49% Seattle Mariners

Early-inning edges often track season-long starter quality where Mariners hold marginal advantage. No weather or rest data available. Traini...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Seattle Mariners

The First Five Innings outcome is heavily influenced by the starting pitchers. Given the Mariners' historical strength in developing and acq...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Seattle Mariners

Historically, the Mariners have shown a tendency to start games strongly, which translates to a slight edge in the first five innings. This...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Seattle Mariners

The first five innings favor the team with stronger starting pitching, which Seattle typically has. The Pirates' offense is weaker early in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Seattle Mariners

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Seattle Mariners

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Seattle Mariners

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Seattle Mariners

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Seattle Mariners

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Seattle Mariners

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Seattle Mariners

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1032–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 4bec4aee57bd93f0…
Kickoff
Wed, Jun 24 · 22:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 5921,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-24T22:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 24 Jun 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Seattle Mariners",
        "home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-21T05:52:05+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →