Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 2–4
Pittsburgh Pirates logo

Pittsburgh PiratesvsMiami Marlins

Miami Marlins logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final2–4 Locked 30picks · 18 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus missed

Pittsburgh Pirates 2–4 Miami Marlins

3 of 6 AIs leaned Pittsburgh Pirates — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/6
Correct calls
3/6
Final
2–4

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 2/8
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 L

Laying -1.5 at home is a modest ask for the Pirates given their home-field edge and slight roster advantage. However, confidence is low beca...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% home_ -1.5

Home team receives run-line advantage in MLB with Pirates marginally better at PNC in past data. Limited 2026 context means sticking to hist...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 L

Given the lack of specific 2026 team form, pitching matchups, and the general competitiveness of MLB games, a close contest is a reasonable...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Miami Marlins

Given the historical slight edge for the Marlins in head-to-head matchups and a general assessment of team strengths, they are predicted to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 27% Miami Marlins -1.5 W

Marlins are slight favorites on moneyline but not strong enough to cover a -1.5 run line consistently. Spreads require a multi-run win, whic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Pittsburgh Pirates L

Pittsburgh has been slightly more competitive in 2026 and plays at home with park familiarity. Miami's rotation has shown volatility mid-sea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Pittsburgh Pirates L

Both teams historically mediocre with Pirates holding slight home edge in divisional play. No 2026-specific form or injuries available so re...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Miami Marlins W

My predictions are based solely on my training data, which includes historical team performance and general MLB trends up to late 2025. With...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Miami Marlins W

Based on general knowledge of MLB team performance trends up to my last training data cutoff, the Miami Marlins have historically shown a sl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Miami Marlins W

Training data through 2025-09. The Marlins have historically performed well against the Pirates, and recent form (end of 2025) showed the Ma...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Under 8.5 3/10
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Under 8.5 W

Both Pittsburgh and Miami entered 2026 with middling offenses and bullpen arms capable of strong outings. Early summer baseball (June) typic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Marlins and Pirates offenses were average to below in prior seasons with games often exceeding run totals. Training knowledge through 2025 i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Over 8.5 L

Based on my training data up to late 2025, MLB games often trend towards higher scoring, especially in moderately hitter-friendly parks like...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

Without specific pitching matchups or park factors, a general over/under prediction is challenging. However, average MLB game totals often l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Under 8.5

Both teams had middling offenses in 2025, and pitching staffs were average. Head-to-head games often trended low-scoring. Without current li...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Miami Marlins 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Under 4.5 (first 5 innings)

First five innings totals typically skew under early in the season when bullpen usage is fresh and starters are sharp. Both Pittsburgh and M...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Pittsburgh Pirates

First-five markets mirror full-game home lean with Pirates starters holding slight historical advantage. Training cutoff prevents updated bu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Miami Marlins

Focusing on the first five innings emphasizes starting pitching, which historically has been a strength for the Miami Marlins within my trai...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Miami Marlins

Predicting the first five innings often relies heavily on starting pitcher matchups, which are unavailable. However, if the Marlins' project...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% Miami Marlins

Marlins' starting pitching was slightly better than Pirates' in 2025. Early innings advantage for Miami, but with stale data a low confidenc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Pittsburgh Pirates

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Miami Marlins

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Miami Marlins

55
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pittsburgh Pirates

54
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Pittsburgh Pirates

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Miami Marlins

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: c34e03778ac5035b…
Kickoff
Sun, Jun 14 · 16:15 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 2737,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-14T16:15:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:15:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Miami Marlins",
        "home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:46+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →