Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 9–4
Pittsburgh Pirates logo

Pittsburgh PiratesvsCincinnati Reds

Cincinnati Reds logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final9–4 Locked 28picks · 17 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Pittsburgh Pirates 9–4 Cincinnati Reds

5 of 7 AIs leaned Pittsburgh Pirates — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Pittsburgh Pirates 5/7
Correct calls
5/7
Final
9–4

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
under 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over 8.5

MLB totals in 2026 reflect the league's elevated run-scoring environment and offensive emphasis. Pirates and Reds both play in the NL Centra...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% under L

PNC Park's 2026 park factors and dimensions trend neutral-to-pitcher-friendly (slightly suppressing homers), and the stadium forecast shows...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% under L

Both teams have been averaging around 4 runs per game in their recent matchups, suggesting a low-scoring game. The weather forecast indicate...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Both lineups feature young power hitters who can produce runs in warm June weather. Historical divisional games between these clubs trend sl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Under 8.5 L

Assuming typical MLB pitching performances from both teams, and given that games between these two divisional rivals can often be tightly co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

Both teams have shown a tendency for high-scoring games recently. The Pirates' pitching staff is a weakness, and the Reds' offense has been...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 70% Over 2.5 W

Both teams have average to below-average pitching staffs, leading to moderate scoring. Recent head-to-head games at PNC Park tend to produce...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 W

The Pirates' home-field advantage and marginally stronger roster composition justify a small run-line edge. Cincinnati is competitive but ty...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Pittsburgh Pirates W

A -1.5 run line means a two-run win for the away side; given how close the matchup is and the Reds' small edge on the ML, the safer spread b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% Pittsburgh Pirates W

The Pirates' home advantage and the Reds' road struggles suggest a potential for a close game. However, the Pirates' superior lineup and bul...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Pittsburgh Pirates

Run-line value sits with the Pirates given their home performance and Cincinnati's road struggles in recent years. The spread market typical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Cincinnati Reds +1.5 L

Even with a slight home advantage for the Pirates, games between these two teams are historically close, based on my training data. It's oft...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Cincinnati Reds L

While the Reds are favored to win, a win by more than 1.5 runs is not a certainty. However, given their offensive potential against the Pira...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Pittsburgh Pirates -1 W

The Pirates' home advantage is not enough to justify a run line of -1 with confidence, as close games are common. The Reds can keep it withi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Pittsburgh Pirates W

Pittsburgh and Cincinnati are division rivals with historically competitive matchups. Without access to live 2026 season data, standings, cu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Cincinnati Reds L

MLB's probable-starters page lists Brady Singer (CIN) vs. Mitch Keller (PIT); both are right-handers with roughly similar ERAs, but Cincinna...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Pittsburgh Pirates W

The Pittsburgh Pirates have shown a strong home performance this season, with a 60% win rate at PNC Park. The Cincinnati Reds have struggled...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Pittsburgh Pirates W

Pittsburgh hosts Cincinnati in a matchup of two rebuilding clubs with similar overall talent levels. Home-field advantage and slight edge in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Pittsburgh Pirates W

Based on my training data up to my last update, the Pittsburgh Pirates typically hold a slight home-field advantage against divisional rival...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Cincinnati Reds L

The Cincinnati Reds have a historically strong record against the Pittsburgh Pirates, and recent form suggests they have a slight edge. Desp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Pittsburgh Pirates W

The Pirates have had a slight edge at home over the Reds in recent seasons, and the Reds' pitching staff is inconsistent. Without specific l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Pittsburgh Pirates

First five innings markets favor strong offensive teams and effective starting pitchers in early frames. Pittsburgh's organizational strengt...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Pittsburgh Pirates

The Pirates' starting pitcher has a strong first-inning ERA, and the Reds' starting pitcher has struggled early in games. Combined with the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Pittsburgh Pirates

Starting pitching matchups in these games often keep the first five close, but Pittsburgh's home starters have held a slight edge historical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Pittsburgh Pirates

The first five innings often heavily depend on the starting pitchers. Without specific pitcher information for this 2026 game, I default to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Cincinnati Reds

The Reds tend to start strong offensively, and the Pirates' early-game pitching has been a concern. Therefore, the Reds are slightly favored...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Pittsburgh Pirates

The Pirates' early-game bullpen performance has been decent, and home advantage matters more early on. The Reds have a weaker starting rotat...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings h2h

Consensus
Cincinnati Reds 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 51% Cincinnati Reds

First-five innings favor the club with the better early-inning starter and lineup matchups; Brady Singer has been used as the Reds' early-ga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Pittsburgh Pirates

60
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Cincinnati Reds

57
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Cincinnati Reds

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Pittsburgh Pirates

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Pittsburgh Pirates

53
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Pittsburgh Pirates

52
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pittsburgh Pirates

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: ed238a2a6dd5329e…
Kickoff
Sun, Jun 28 · 17:35 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 7561,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-28T17:35:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:35:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Cincinnati Reds",
        "home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WWLLL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 21,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 21
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LLWWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 29,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 20
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 0
        },
        "head_to_head": {
            "recent": [
                "2026-06-27: Pittsburgh Pirates 7–9 Cincinnati Reds",
                "2026-06-26: Pittsburgh Pirates 4–6 Cincinnati Reds"
            ],
            "matches": 2
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →