Pittsburgh PiratesvsChicago Cubs
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/5 models |
Chicago Cubs 3/6 models |
Over 8.5 3/6 models |
Chicago Cubs 3/6 models |
over 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
58%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates Early-inning momentum often tracks full-game trends. Pirates' recent offensive pace (7 runs/game at home) suggests stronger early at-bats. C...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Pittsburgh Pirates Pittsburgh's home record is stronger (3-2 at PNC Park implied by 35 runs scored vs 22 conceded over 5 matches), while Chicago's road form is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Combined 56 runs in 5 recent matches (11.2 runs/game average) suggests lean toward Over. Pirates average 7.0 runs/game at home, Cubs 4.2 on...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 Pirates' +13 run differential and home advantage align with a modest 1.5-run spread. Cubs' road form is fragile (21 runs in 5 away games), w...
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs' starting pitcher, Matthew Boyd, has been effective in the early innings, giving them an edge in the first five innings.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs have a slightly better overall record and have been performing well on the road, which gives them a marginal edge over the...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have been scoring at a moderate rate recently, and the game is expected to be competitive, suggesting a total runs count over 2.5...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs Given the Cubs' slight advantage in overall performance and road games, they are expected to cover the -1 spread.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
51%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
53%
under |
52%
Chicago Cubs |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Chicago Cubs Starting pitching matchup leans slightly toward Cubs staff per historical splits. Early innings at PNC trend low scoring which helps the bet...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Chicago Cubs Cubs have historically held an edge over the Pirates in recent seasons per training data. PNC Park suppresses offense which favors the bette...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
under PNC Park plays as a pitcher-friendly venue with deep dimensions. Both teams show recent scoring inconsistency and long rest days limit offen...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago Cubs Cubs roster talent edge projects to a slight road favorite in neutral conditions. Pirates home form is solid but not enough to overcome the...
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
56%
Over 8.5 |
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Pittsburgh Pirates The first five innings are heavily influenced by starting pitchers, but without that specific information for 2026, I'm basing this on the o...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Based on the provided recent form data, the Pittsburgh Pirates have shown a stronger offense and more effective pitching, reflected in a hig...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over 8.5 The recent form shows both teams involved in high-scoring games, with the Pirates averaging 11.4 total runs per game and the Cubs averaging...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 Given the Pittsburgh Pirates' stronger run differential over their last five games, scoring significantly more and conceding less than the C...
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
52%
Chicago Cubs |
58%
over |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs have a slight edge due to their recent road form and a potentially stronger starting pitcher matchup, despite the Pirates' recent h...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over The wind blowing out at PNC Park, combined with the offensive capabilities of both teams and potential pitcher matchups that could lead to e...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago Cubs While the Cubs are favored on the moneyline, the Pirates' recent home performance and the potential for a close game make covering a -1.5 sp...
4 sources cited
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
over Both offenses have been potent recently, and the potential for strong starting pitchers to falter early makes the first five innings a perio...
4 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
52%
Over 8.5 |
40%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 |
— | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates The first five innings often reflect starting pitcher performance and early offensive output. Without specific pitching data, the Pirates' r...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pirates have scored 35 runs in their last 5 games compared to the Cubs' 21, indicating stronger offensive form. Home field advantage at...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, with the Pirates averaging 7 runs per game and the Cubs 4.2. PNC Park is neutr...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 While the Pirates have been scoring well, winning by more than one run requires a dominant performance. The Cubs have shown they can compete...
First five innings total runs 4.5
?
First five innings total runs 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
First 5 innings
ConsensusPittsburgh Pirates 3/5
Early-inning momentum often tracks full-game trends. Pirates' recent offensive pace (7 runs/game at home) suggests stronger early at-bats. C...
The Cubs' starting pitcher, Matthew Boyd, has been effective in the early innings, giving them an edge in the first five innings.
Starting pitching matchup leans slightly toward Cubs staff per historical splits. Early innings at PNC trend low scoring which helps the bet...
The first five innings are heavily influenced by starting pitchers, but without that specific information for 2026, I'm basing this on the o...
The first five innings often reflect starting pitcher performance and early offensive output. Without specific pitching data, the Pirates' r...
Match winner
ConsensusChicago Cubs 3/6
Pittsburgh's home record is stronger (3-2 at PNC Park implied by 35 runs scored vs 22 conceded over 5 matches), while Chicago's road form is...
The Chicago Cubs have a slightly better overall record and have been performing well on the road, which gives them a marginal edge over the...
Cubs have historically held an edge over the Pirates in recent seasons per training data. PNC Park suppresses offense which favors the bette...
Based on the provided recent form data, the Pittsburgh Pirates have shown a stronger offense and more effective pitching, reflected in a hig...
The Cubs have a slight edge due to their recent road form and a potentially stronger starting pitcher matchup, despite the Pirates' recent h...
The Pirates have scored 35 runs in their last 5 games compared to the Cubs' 21, indicating stronger offensive form. Home field advantage at...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 8.5 3/6
Combined 56 runs in 5 recent matches (11.2 runs/game average) suggests lean toward Over. Pirates average 7.0 runs/game at home, Cubs 4.2 on...
Both teams have been scoring at a moderate rate recently, and the game is expected to be competitive, suggesting a total runs count over 2.5...
PNC Park plays as a pitcher-friendly venue with deep dimensions. Both teams show recent scoring inconsistency and long rest days limit offen...
The recent form shows both teams involved in high-scoring games, with the Pirates averaging 11.4 total runs per game and the Cubs averaging...
The wind blowing out at PNC Park, combined with the offensive capabilities of both teams and potential pitcher matchups that could lead to e...
Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, with the Pirates averaging 7 runs per game and the Cubs 4.2. PNC Park is neutr...
Spread
ConsensusChicago Cubs 3/6
Pirates' +13 run differential and home advantage align with a modest 1.5-run spread. Cubs' road form is fragile (21 runs in 5 away games), w...
Given the Cubs' slight advantage in overall performance and road games, they are expected to cover the -1 spread.
Cubs roster talent edge projects to a slight road favorite in neutral conditions. Pirates home form is solid but not enough to overcome the...
Given the Pittsburgh Pirates' stronger run differential over their last five games, scoring significantly more and conceding less than the C...
While the Cubs are favored on the moneyline, the Pirates' recent home performance and the potential for a close game make covering a -1.5 sp...
While the Pirates have been scoring well, winning by more than one run requires a dominant performance. The Cubs have shown they can compete...
First five innings total runs 4.5
Consensusover 1/1
Both offenses have been potent recently, and the potential for strong starting pitchers to falter early makes the first five innings a perio...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Pittsburgh Pirates
GPT-4o Mini
Chicago Cubs
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Pittsburgh Pirates
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Cubs
DeepSeek V3
Pittsburgh Pirates
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9162464ef2ec901f…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Jul 24 · 22:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 15207,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "PNC Park",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-07-24T22:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Cubs",
"home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 35,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 16,
"home": 16
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.