Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · PNC Park
Awaiting result · 1108h 31m ago
Pittsburgh Pirates logo

Pittsburgh PiratesvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks AIs split

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

First 5 innings

Consensus
Pittsburgh Pirates 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Pittsburgh Pirates

Early-inning momentum often tracks full-game trends. Pirates' recent offensive pace (7 runs/game at home) suggests stronger early at-bats. C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

Boyd's recent tendency to work six innings limits early bullpen exposure and the Cubs have produced steady run support in recent starts; Jon...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' starting pitcher, Matthew Boyd, has been effective in the early innings, giving them an edge in the first five innings.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Chicago Cubs

Starting pitching matchup leans slightly toward Cubs staff per historical splits. Early innings at PNC trend low scoring which helps the bet...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 54% Pittsburgh Pirates

The first five innings are heavily influenced by starting pitchers, but without that specific information for 2026, I'm basing this on the o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Pittsburgh Pirates

The first five innings often reflect starting pitcher performance and early offensive output. Without specific pitching data, the Pirates' r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Pittsburgh Pirates

Pittsburgh's home record is stronger (3-2 at PNC Park implied by 35 runs scored vs 22 conceded over 5 matches), while Chicago's road form is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% Chicago Cubs

Matthew Boyd has been delivering multiple 6+ inning starts in July and provides length that reduces bullpen variance, while Jared Jones has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Chicago Cubs have a slightly better overall record and have been performing well on the road, which gives them a marginal edge over the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Chicago Cubs

Cubs have historically held an edge over the Pirates in recent seasons per training data. PNC Park suppresses offense which favors the bette...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Pittsburgh Pirates

Based on the provided recent form data, the Pittsburgh Pirates have shown a stronger offense and more effective pitching, reflected in a hig...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs have a slight edge due to their recent road form and a potentially stronger starting pitcher matchup, despite the Pirates' recent h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Pittsburgh Pirates

The Pirates have scored 35 runs in their last 5 games compared to the Cubs' 21, indicating stronger offensive form. Home field advantage at...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: Pittsburgh Pirates 56%

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 8.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over 8.5

Combined 56 runs in 5 recent matches (11.2 runs/game average) suggests lean toward Over. Pirates average 7.0 runs/game at home, Cubs 4.2 on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% under

Both probable starters have produced low ER totals recently and are likely to limit hard contact early; PNC Park historically suppresses hom...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have been scoring at a moderate rate recently, and the game is expected to be competitive, suggesting a total runs count over 2.5...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% under

PNC Park plays as a pitcher-friendly venue with deep dimensions. Both teams show recent scoring inconsistency and long rest days limit offen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Over 8.5

The recent form shows both teams involved in high-scoring games, with the Pirates averaging 11.4 total runs per game and the Cubs averaging...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

The wind blowing out at PNC Park, combined with the offensive capabilities of both teams and potential pitcher matchups that could lead to e...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, with the Pirates averaging 7 runs per game and the Cubs 4.2. PNC Park is neutr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: 8.0 · Over 52%

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5

Pirates' +13 run differential and home advantage align with a modest 1.5-run spread. Cubs' road form is fragile (21 runs in 5 away games), w...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Chicago Cubs -1.5

Given Boyd's demonstrated ability to eat 6+ innings recently, the Cubs have a reasonable shot to win by multiple runs if Boyd holds deep int...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

Given the Cubs' slight advantage in overall performance and road games, they are expected to cover the -1 spread.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Chicago Cubs

Cubs roster talent edge projects to a slight road favorite in neutral conditions. Pirates home form is solid but not enough to overcome the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5

Given the Pittsburgh Pirates' stronger run differential over their last five games, scoring significantly more and conceding less than the C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chicago Cubs

While the Cubs are favored on the moneyline, the Pirates' recent home performance and the potential for a close game make covering a -1.5 sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5

While the Pirates have been scoring well, winning by more than one run requires a dominant performance. The Cubs have shown they can compete...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings total runs 4.5

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

Both offenses have been potent recently, and the potential for strong starting pitchers to falter early makes the first five innings a perio...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Pittsburgh Pirates

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago Cubs

56
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Cubs

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pittsburgh Pirates

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Pittsburgh Pirates

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

54

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1223–997 · 55%
-800.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 737–629 · 54%
-408.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 1439–1533 · 48%
-1,291.5u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1065–1142 · 48%
-979.0u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1798–1929 · 48%
-1,743.7u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1786–1978 · 47%
-1,669.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1481–1738 · 46%
-1,536.8u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Bookmaker odds

1 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted

Book Pittsburgh Pirates Draw Chicago Cubs
Draftkings 1.78 — 2.07
Book Line Over Under
Draftkings 7.5 1.88 1.94
Book Pittsburgh Pirates Chicago Cubs

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 9162464ef2ec901f…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 24 · 22:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 15207,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "PNC Park",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-24T22:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WWWLL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 21,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 33
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LWWWL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 35,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 22
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 16,
            "home": 16
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →