Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Upcoming · in 86h 48m
Pittsburgh Pirates logo

Pittsburgh PiratesvsAtlanta Braves

Atlanta Braves logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5

While the Braves edge the h2h matchup, a -1.5 spread requires them to win by 2+ runs. The Pirates' home field (even if weak in this sample)...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Atlanta Braves +1.5

Taking the Braves +1.5 (they can lose by one or win) is the safer spread play: Atlanta's offence and depth typically keep games close even v...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Atlanta Braves

The Atlanta Braves have a strong away record, making them likely to cover the -1 spread against the Pirates.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Atlanta Braves

Braves hold the superior roster talent edge even on the road. Recent conceded-run rates favor Atlanta covering a modest run line. Training d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Atlanta Braves -1.5

Given the Braves' general strength and the Pirates' recent tendency to concede many runs, a win by more than one run for Atlanta is a reason...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Atlanta Braves

Given the slight perceived edge for the Braves in head-to-head, they are also slightly favored to cover a standard spread. This prediction a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Atlanta Braves -1.5

Braves are the stronger team but have not been blowing out opponents recently. The run line is a toss-up given both teams' form. Without spe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Atlanta Braves

Both teams are in poor form (2-3 over their last five), but the Braves have the edge in recent run differential despite scoring only 20 runs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Pittsburgh Pirates

Pittsburgh starts Paul Skenes (high-K, strong home run suppression recently) and ESPN/CBS matchups show the Pirates are favored by analytic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Pittsburgh Pirates

The Pittsburgh Pirates have a home advantage and have shown competitive form recently, making them slight favorites over the Atlanta Braves.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Atlanta Braves

Atlanta enters as the stronger club overall based on historical talent differential. Both sides show identical 2-3 records in the supplied l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Atlanta Braves

Based on general training data through 2025-09, the Atlanta Braves are historically a stronger team. Although both teams have a 2W-3L record...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Atlanta Braves

The Atlanta Braves are generally a stronger team than the Pittsburgh Pirates. While specific starting pitchers for this future date are unkn...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Atlanta Braves

Braves have a stronger track record and historically better roster, though recent form for both teams is middling. Atlanta's rest is equal t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 8.5

Combined run production across the last five matches totals 48 runs in 10 team-games (4.8 RPG average). Both bullpens have had moderate rest...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% over

Both starters have shown recent variability (Skenes had a big-run start on July 1; Elder has shortened outings recently), the weather at PNC...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, suggesting a game with more than 2.5 runs is likely.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Supplied offensive numbers show 48 combined runs across 10 games. Three days rest for both pitching staffs typically produces higher run env...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Over 8.5

The Pirates' recent form indicates a high-scoring environment, with them scoring 28 runs and conceding 35 in their last five games. The Brav...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

Without knowing the starting pitchers or park factors for this specific date, it's difficult to make a definitive call. However, MLB games i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both teams have shown moderate scoring in their last 5 games, with Pirates averaging 5.6 runs per game and Braves 4.0. PNC Park is neutral f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Atlanta Braves 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Under 4.5 (first 5 innings)

Early-inning scoring is typically lower than full-game totals. Both teams' bullpens are well-rested and starters should be fresh after 3 day...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Pittsburgh Pirates

First-five is heavily driven by the starting pitchers' early-inning performance: Paul Skenes consistently generates strikeouts and limits ha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Atlanta Braves

The Braves' offense is expected to perform well in the first five innings, giving them an edge over the Pirates early in the game.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Atlanta Braves

Early-game advantage accrues to the higher-quality lineup when both clubs are equally rested. Atlanta's historical edge in first-five win ra...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Atlanta Braves Lead

The first five innings often showcase the strength of the starting pitchers and the top of the batting order. Historically, the Braves are e...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Atlanta Braves

In baseball, the first five innings often reflect the strength of the starting pitchers. Assuming the Braves will have a more capable starti...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Atlanta Braves

Early innings often favor the stronger starting pitcher, and Braves have the edge in overall talent. No specific pitcher matchup is known, b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Pittsburgh Pirates

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Atlanta Braves

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Pittsburgh Pirates

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Atlanta Braves

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Atlanta Braves

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Atlanta Braves

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Atlanta Braves

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 123–84 · 59%
+72.2u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 132–106 · 55%
-10.7u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 773–656 · 54%
-459.9u
o4-mini
o4-mini 76–68 · 53%
+77.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 551–500 · 52%
-280.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 172–162 · 52%
-39.9u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 110–104 · 51%
+114.9u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 165–162 · 50%
-51.8u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 889–909 · 49%
-723.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 637–654 · 49%
-412.5u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 111–115 · 49%
+99.0u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 833–875 · 49%
-566.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 696–747 · 48%
-545.8u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 437–472 · 48%
-317.0u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 821–949 · 46%
-786.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 134–168 · 44%
-64.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 2231a92f792eb134…
Kickoff
Tue, Jul 7 · 22:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 10165,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-07T22:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 07 Jul 2026 22:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Atlanta Braves",
        "home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WLWLL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 20,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 23
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LWLLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 28,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 35
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 3,
            "home": 3
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →