Pittsburgh PanthersvsMiami (OH) RedHawks
MOAI predictions
5 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
book: Pittsburgh Panthers 90% |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
book: 49.5 · Over 52% |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
book: Pittsburgh Panthers -16.5 |
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Pittsburgh Panthers 5/5 models |
Under 3/5 models |
Pittsburgh Panthers 3/5 models |
Pittsburgh Panthers 4/4 models |
Pittsburgh Panthers 1/1 models |
|
| Bookmaker line | Pittsburgh Panthers 90% | 49.5 · Over 52% | Pittsburgh Panthers -16.5 | — | — | |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
91%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.11
|
56%
Over
~1.91
|
89%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.87
|
87%
Pittsburgh Panthers |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
91%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh is a Power Five program with vastly superior talent, recruiting, and resources compared to MAC-level Miami (OH). The -16.5 spread...
Odds: 1.11
Edge: +0.9%
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over Pittsburgh's offense should move the ball freely against a MAC defense; a 16.5-point spread implies the Panthers will score in the 28–35 ran...
Odds: 1.91
Edge: +3.6%
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
89%
Pittsburgh Panthers A 16.5-point home spread for a Power Five program against a MAC opponent reflects legitimate talent and preparation gaps. Pittsburgh's recru...
Odds: 1.87
Edge: +35.5%
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
87%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh's offense should establish control early against a MAC defense that has limited preparation resources. First-half spreads and mon...
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
89%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.11
|
54%
Under
~1.91
|
81%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.87
|
84%
Pittsburgh Panthers |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
89%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh is an ACC program with superior talent depth and recruiting compared to MAC opponent Miami (OH). Historical results in similar mi...
Odds: 1.11
Edge: -1.1%
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Under Opening total of 49.5 reflects Pitt's expected offensive output against a weaker defense. Miami (OH) offenses have trended conservative in r...
Odds: 1.91
Edge: +1.6%
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
81%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pitt is a multi-touchdown favorite at -16.5 reflecting the talent gap. Miami (OH) rarely keeps games within two scores against ACC teams on...
Odds: 1.87
Edge: +27.5%
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
84%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pitt should establish dominance early with superior line play and preparation. Miami (OH) has shown slow starts in similar mismatch games. F...
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
88%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.11
|
52%
Under
~1.91
|
53%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.87
|
— |
78%
Pittsburgh Panthers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Pittsburgh Panthers Based on historical NCAAF trends and my training data through 2025-09, Power Five teams like Pittsburgh typically have a significant talent...
Odds: 1.11
Edge: -2.1%
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under Relying on training data through 2025-09, early-season matchups featuring a significant talent gap often see the favored Power Five team est...
Odds: 1.91
Edge: -0.4%
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Pittsburgh Panthers Based on my training data through 2025-09, Pittsburgh, as a Power Five team hosting a Group of Five opponent, is well-positioned to cover a...
Odds: 1.87
Edge: -0.5%
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
78%
Pittsburgh Panthers Drawing from training data through 2025-09, Power Five teams facing Group of Five opponents at home typically aim to establish early dominan... |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.11
|
55%
Over
~1.91
|
53%
Miami (OH) RedHawks |
65%
Pittsburgh Panthers |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh is a strong home favorite against Miami (OH). The Panthers typically perform well at home, and their overall program strength is...
Odds: 1.11
Edge: -5.1%
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over The total line is set at 49.5, which is moderate for college football. While Pittsburgh's defense can be strong, their offense has shown cap...
Odds: 1.91
Edge: +2.6%
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Miami (OH) RedHawks While Pittsburgh is favored to win, covering a 16.5-point spread can be challenging. Miami (OH) may be outmatched overall but can play a mor...
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
65%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh is expected to start strong at home against a less-heralded opponent. The Panthers' ability to establish dominance early, combine...
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
85%
Pittsburgh Panthers
~1.11
|
55%
Under
~1.91
|
55%
Pittsburgh Panthers -16.5 |
72%
Pittsburgh Panthers |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh is a strong Power Five program with superior talent and depth compared to MAC opponent Miami (OH). Historical data and typical te...
Odds: 1.11
Edge: -5.1%
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under The consensus total is 49.5, which is moderate for a Power Five vs. Group of Five matchup. Miami (OH) typically plays a conservative, run-or...
Odds: 1.91
Edge: +2.6%
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Pittsburgh Panthers -16.5 Pittsburgh is expected to win by a significant margin, but covering a 16.5-point spread against a disciplined Miami team is not a certainty....
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
72%
Pittsburgh Panthers Pittsburgh's superior talent likely gives them an early advantage, and they are expected to control the first half. Miami may struggle to ge...
First half winner
?
First half winner
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusPittsburgh Panthers 5/5
Pittsburgh is a Power Five program with vastly superior talent, recruiting, and resources compared to MAC-level Miami (OH). The -16.5 spread...
Pittsburgh is an ACC program with superior talent depth and recruiting compared to MAC opponent Miami (OH). Historical results in similar mi...
Based on historical NCAAF trends and my training data through 2025-09, Power Five teams like Pittsburgh typically have a significant talent...
Pittsburgh is a strong home favorite against Miami (OH). The Panthers typically perform well at home, and their overall program strength is...
Pittsburgh is a strong Power Five program with superior talent and depth compared to MAC opponent Miami (OH). Historical data and typical te...
Bookmaker line: Pittsburgh Panthers 90%
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 3/5
Pittsburgh's offense should move the ball freely against a MAC defense; a 16.5-point spread implies the Panthers will score in the 28–35 ran...
Opening total of 49.5 reflects Pitt's expected offensive output against a weaker defense. Miami (OH) offenses have trended conservative in r...
Relying on training data through 2025-09, early-season matchups featuring a significant talent gap often see the favored Power Five team est...
The total line is set at 49.5, which is moderate for college football. While Pittsburgh's defense can be strong, their offense has shown cap...
The consensus total is 49.5, which is moderate for a Power Five vs. Group of Five matchup. Miami (OH) typically plays a conservative, run-or...
Bookmaker line: 49.5 · Over 52%
Spread
ConsensusPittsburgh Panthers 3/5
A 16.5-point home spread for a Power Five program against a MAC opponent reflects legitimate talent and preparation gaps. Pittsburgh's recru...
Pitt is a multi-touchdown favorite at -16.5 reflecting the talent gap. Miami (OH) rarely keeps games within two scores against ACC teams on...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Pittsburgh, as a Power Five team hosting a Group of Five opponent, is well-positioned to cover a...
While Pittsburgh is favored to win, covering a 16.5-point spread can be challenging. Miami (OH) may be outmatched overall but can play a mor...
Pittsburgh is expected to win by a significant margin, but covering a 16.5-point spread against a disciplined Miami team is not a certainty....
Bookmaker line: Pittsburgh Panthers -16.5
First half winner
ConsensusPittsburgh Panthers 4/4
Pittsburgh's offense should establish control early against a MAC defense that has limited preparation resources. First-half spreads and mon...
Pitt should establish dominance early with superior line play and preparation. Miami (OH) has shown slow starts in similar mismatch games. F...
Pittsburgh is expected to start strong at home against a less-heralded opponent. The Panthers' ability to establish dominance early, combine...
Pittsburgh's superior talent likely gives them an early advantage, and they are expected to control the first half. Miami may struggle to ge...
First half winner
ConsensusPittsburgh Panthers 1/1
Drawing from training data through 2025-09, Power Five teams facing Group of Five opponents at home typically aim to establish early dominan...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Pittsburgh Panthers
Grok 4 Fast
Pittsburgh Panthers
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Pittsburgh Panthers
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Pittsburgh Panthers
DeepSeek V3
Pittsburgh Panthers
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Bookmaker odds
12 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted
| Book | Pittsburgh Panthers | Draw | Miami (OH) RedHawks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanduel | 1.11 | — | 6.80 |
| Unibet | 1.10 | — | 6.40 |
| Book | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanduel | 49.5 | 1.91 | 1.91 |
| Book | Pittsburgh Panthers | Miami (OH) RedHawks |
|---|---|---|
| Draftkings | -16.5 @ 1.87 | +16.5 @ 1.95 |
| Fanduel | -15.5 @ 1.87 | +15.5 @ 1.95 |
| BetOnline | -16.5 @ 1.91 | +16.5 @ 1.91 |
| Betus | -16.5 @ 1.91 | +16.5 @ 1.91 |
| Bovada | -16.5 @ 1.87 | +16.5 @ 1.95 |
| Coral | -16.5 @ 1.91 | +16.5 @ 1.91 |
| Gtbets | -16.5 @ 1.88 | +16.5 @ 1.96 |
| Ladbrokes | -16.5 @ 1.91 | +16.5 @ 1.91 |
| LowVig | -16.5 @ 1.94 | +16.5 @ 1.94 |
| Onexbet | -16.5 @ 1.91 | +16.5 @ 1.91 |
| Williamhill | -16.5 @ 1.91 | +16.5 @ 1.91 |
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5bf9d6d6669f96ed…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 5 · 16:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 25,
"sport": "american-football",
"venue": null,
"league": "NCAAF",
"starts_at": "2026-09-05T16:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 05 Sep 2026 16:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Miami (OH) RedHawks",
"home": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The quarterback matchup and O-line vs pass-rush battle dominate — a backup QB or injured tackle moves the line sharply.",
"Turnovers and red-zone efficiency decide scoring; weigh recent ball-security trends.",
"Weather is decisive outdoors: wind > ~15mph and cold suppress the passing game and kicking, favouring unders and the run.",
"Rest matters — a bye week or short (Thursday) week changes preparation and legs.",
"Check injuries to skill positions (WR1, RB1) and the secondary."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": {
"away": 6.8,
"home": 1.11
},
"note": "Bookmaker consensus odds at the moment of the call. Frozen here so settlement grades against the same line.",
"extra_markets": {
"h2h": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.1,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.4,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.11,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.8,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.1,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.4,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.11,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.8,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.1,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.4,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.11,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.8,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.1,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.4,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.11,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.8,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.1,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.4,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
}
],
"totals": [
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 49.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Over"
}
],
"spreads": [
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -15.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 15.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.88,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.96,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -15.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 15.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.88,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.96,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -15.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 15.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.88,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.96,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -15.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 15.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.88,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.96,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
},
{
"point": -16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Pittsburgh Panthers"
},
{
"point": 16.5,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Miami (OH) RedHawks"
}
]
}
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.