Peyton StearnsvsLiudmila Samsonova
LSYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Liudmila Samsonova 3/4 models |
Over 2/8 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Peyton Stearns |
58%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Peyton Stearns Training data through 2023 shows Stearns with solid hard-court results in North American events while Samsonova's movement and conversion ra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 2.5 Both players have shown competitive sets in recent hard-court matches per training knowledge. Expect a three-set match given comparable leve... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
72%
Liudmila Samsonova |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Liudmila Samsonova Based on historical performance from my training data up to my last update, Liudmila Samsonova is the more accomplished and higher-ranked pl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Samsonova's historical tendency to dictate matches and her strong serve, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome. While S... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Liudmila Samsonova |
55%
Over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Liudmila Samsonova Based on training data through 2025-09, Liudmila Samsonova is generally considered the stronger player, with a higher career win rate and mo...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over While Samsonova is favored, Stearns is a capable player who can push matches to their limit. Samsonova can also be prone to lapses in concen... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Liudmila Samsonova |
54%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Liudmila Samsonova No live access, so predicting from training data through 2025. Samsonova is the more proven hard-court player, with a bigger serve and heavi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Under 2.5 Predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. WTA hard-court matches at this level often go the distance, but Samsonova's high-varianc... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLiudmila Samsonova 3/4
Training data through 2023 shows Stearns with solid hard-court results in North American events while Samsonova's movement and conversion ra...
Based on historical performance from my training data up to my last update, Liudmila Samsonova is the more accomplished and higher-ranked pl...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Liudmila Samsonova is generally considered the stronger player, with a higher career win rate and mo...
No live access, so predicting from training data through 2025. Samsonova is the more proven hard-court player, with a bigger serve and heavi...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2/8
Both players have shown competitive sets in recent hard-court matches per training knowledge. Expect a three-set match given comparable leve...
Given Samsonova's historical tendency to dictate matches and her strong serve, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome. While S...
While Samsonova is favored, Stearns is a capable player who can push matches to their limit. Samsonova can also be prone to lapses in concen...
Predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. WTA hard-court matches at this level often go the distance, but Samsonova's high-varianc...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Liudmila Samsonova
DeepSeek V3
Liudmila Samsonova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Liudmila Samsonova
Grok 4 Fast
Peyton Stearns
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a15bfa2164b11ce2…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 19 · 00:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 44827,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Guadalajara Open presentado por Santander",
"starts_at": "2026-09-19T00:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Liudmila Samsonova",
"home": "Peyton Stearns"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.