Petra MarcinkovsKimberly Birrell
KBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Petra Marcinko 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Petra Marcinko |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Petra Marcinko Petra Marcinko is a Czech player with solid hard-court pedigree and has been steadily improving her ranking, while Kimberly Birrell (Austral...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are solid mid-tier WTA competitors without dominant serves or extreme offensive weapons, which typically leads to longer rallie... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Petra Marcinko |
58%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Petra Marcinko Petra Marcinko holds a higher ranking and stronger hard-court results in recent seasons compared to Birrell. US Open hard courts favor consi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under_2.5 Lower-ranked matchups at slams often finish in straight sets when one player has clear surface edge. Marcinko's serve and return efficiency... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
56%
Petra Marcinko |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Petra Marcinko Based on training data through late 2025, Petra Marcinko is generally considered a player with higher upside and a more aggressive game suit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given the relatively close projected match between these two players based on their general profiles and hard court tendencies from training... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Petra Marcinko |
60%
Kimberly Birrell |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Petra Marcinko Petra Marcinko is a highly-rated young player with a strong junior background and a rapidly improving professional record. While Kimberly Bi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Kimberly Birrell Given Petra Marcinko is the favored player, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. While Birrell could potentially snatch a set, Ma... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Petra Marcinko |
52%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Petra Marcinko Based on training data through early 2025, Marcinko has shown better form on hard courts and a higher ceiling in ranking. Birrell has been i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over_2.5 Both players are similar in level and have shown tendencies to drop sets in close matches. Marcinko can be inconsistent with her concentrati... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusPetra Marcinko 5/5
Petra Marcinko is a Czech player with solid hard-court pedigree and has been steadily improving her ranking, while Kimberly Birrell (Austral...
Petra Marcinko holds a higher ranking and stronger hard-court results in recent seasons compared to Birrell. US Open hard courts favor consi...
Based on training data through late 2025, Petra Marcinko is generally considered a player with higher upside and a more aggressive game suit...
Petra Marcinko is a highly-rated young player with a strong junior background and a rapidly improving professional record. While Kimberly Bi...
Based on training data through early 2025, Marcinko has shown better form on hard courts and a higher ceiling in ranking. Birrell has been i...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Both players are solid mid-tier WTA competitors without dominant serves or extreme offensive weapons, which typically leads to longer rallie...
Lower-ranked matchups at slams often finish in straight sets when one player has clear surface edge. Marcinko's serve and return efficiency...
Given the relatively close projected match between these two players based on their general profiles and hard court tendencies from training...
Given Petra Marcinko is the favored player, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. While Birrell could potentially snatch a set, Ma...
Both players are similar in level and have shown tendencies to drop sets in close matches. Marcinko can be inconsistent with her concentrati...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Petra Marcinko
DeepSeek V3
Petra Marcinko
Claude Haiku 4.5
Petra Marcinko
Grok 4 Fast
Petra Marcinko
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Petra Marcinko
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
53a2896c13911eac…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 17:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31784,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kimberly Birrell",
"home": "Petra Marcinko"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.