Petra MarcinkovsAlycia Parks
APYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alycia Parks 3/5 models |
Over 1.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Alycia Parks |
62%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Alycia Parks Alycia Parks is a rising American talent with superior ranking and hard-court credentials, which is critical for the Abierto GNP Seguros (ty...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 1.5 While Parks is favored, Marcinko is capable of winning a set through defensive tennis and break-point conversion, especially early in the ma... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Alycia Parks |
58%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alycia Parks Alycia Parks holds the higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts entering 2025. Petra Marcinko has shown inconsistent form a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under_2.5 Both players prefer shorter matches on hard courts and have solid serve stats. Training data through late 2024 shows most of their encounter... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Alycia Parks |
55%
3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Alycia Parks Based on training data up to my last update, Alycia Parks possesses a powerful serve and aggressive groundstrokes that are well-suited for h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
3 Despite Parks' offensive prowess, her matches often go three sets due to her occasional inconsistency or strong fight from opponents. Marcin... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Parks |
60%
Alycia Parks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Parks Petra Marcinko is a very young player with immense potential, but Alycia Parks has more experience on the WTA tour. Parks' powerful serve an...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Alycia Parks Given Parks' potential dominance and Marcinko's youth, this match could either be a quick victory for Parks or a tougher contest if Marcinko... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Petra Marcinko |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Petra Marcinko Training data through 2025-09 indicates Marcinko is generally more consistent on hard courts, while Parks relies heavily on her serve and ca...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Given the relative closeness in my h2h assessment, a three-set match is more likely. Both players have the ability to win sets, and the matc... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlycia Parks 3/5
Alycia Parks is a rising American talent with superior ranking and hard-court credentials, which is critical for the Abierto GNP Seguros (ty...
Alycia Parks holds the higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts entering 2025. Petra Marcinko has shown inconsistent form a...
Based on training data up to my last update, Alycia Parks possesses a powerful serve and aggressive groundstrokes that are well-suited for h...
Petra Marcinko is a very young player with immense potential, but Alycia Parks has more experience on the WTA tour. Parks' powerful serve an...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Marcinko is generally more consistent on hard courts, while Parks relies heavily on her serve and ca...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1.5 1/10
While Parks is favored, Marcinko is capable of winning a set through defensive tennis and break-point conversion, especially early in the ma...
Both players prefer shorter matches on hard courts and have solid serve stats. Training data through late 2024 shows most of their encounter...
Despite Parks' offensive prowess, her matches often go three sets due to her occasional inconsistency or strong fight from opponents. Marcin...
Given Parks' potential dominance and Marcinko's youth, this match could either be a quick victory for Parks or a tougher contest if Marcinko...
Given the relative closeness in my h2h assessment, a three-set match is more likely. Both players have the ability to win sets, and the matc...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Alycia Parks
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Parks
Grok 4 Fast
Alycia Parks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alycia Parks
DeepSeek V3
Petra Marcinko
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
eec8e9b6ac02eeb2…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30551,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alycia Parks",
"home": "Petra Marcinko"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.