Panna UdvardyvsMananchaya Sawangkaew
MSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Panna Udvardy 5/5 models |
2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Panna Udvardy |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Panna Udvardy Panna Udvardy is a Hungarian professional with established WTA ranking and harder-court experience, while Mananchaya Sawangkaew is a Thai pl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 US Open women's singles typically sees competitive early-round matches; a straight-set dominance (2–0) is less common than a competitive mat... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Panna Udvardy |
71%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Panna Udvardy Panna Udvardy holds the higher ranking and better hard-court experience entering this US Open qualifier match. Mananchaya Sawangkaew has sho...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
under 2.5 Udvardy's superior serve and return consistency on hard courts typically produces straight-set victories in early-round US Open matches. Saw... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Panna Udvardy |
60%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Panna Udvardy Based on my training data up to its last update, Panna Udvardy has historically been the higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WT...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Given Udvardy's general edge in experience and ranking from historical data, a straight-sets victory (Under 2.5 sets) is the more probable o... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Panna Udvardy |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Panna Udvardy Based on training data, Panna Udvardy is generally a stronger player than Mananchaya Sawangkaew, particularly on hard courts which is the su...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 Given Udvardy's perceived advantage, a 2-0 or 2-1 victory is likely. This suggests the match will go over 1.5 sets, but a quick 2-0 win for... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Panna Udvardy |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Panna Udvardy Based on training data up to 2025, Panna Udvardy is generally ranked higher than Mananchaya Sawangkaew on hard courts, and has more experien...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Given the competitive nature of first-round matches at the US Open, and considering both players' styles, a three-set match is plausible. Sa... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusPanna Udvardy 5/5
Panna Udvardy is a Hungarian professional with established WTA ranking and harder-court experience, while Mananchaya Sawangkaew is a Thai pl...
Panna Udvardy holds the higher ranking and better hard-court experience entering this US Open qualifier match. Mananchaya Sawangkaew has sho...
Based on my training data up to its last update, Panna Udvardy has historically been the higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WT...
Based on training data, Panna Udvardy is generally a stronger player than Mananchaya Sawangkaew, particularly on hard courts which is the su...
Based on training data up to 2025, Panna Udvardy is generally ranked higher than Mananchaya Sawangkaew on hard courts, and has more experien...
Over / Under
Consensus2.5 1/10
US Open women's singles typically sees competitive early-round matches; a straight-set dominance (2–0) is less common than a competitive mat...
Udvardy's superior serve and return consistency on hard courts typically produces straight-set victories in early-round US Open matches. Saw...
Given Udvardy's general edge in experience and ranking from historical data, a straight-sets victory (Under 2.5 sets) is the more probable o...
Given Udvardy's perceived advantage, a 2-0 or 2-1 victory is likely. This suggests the match will go over 1.5 sets, but a quick 2-0 win for...
Given the competitive nature of first-round matches at the US Open, and considering both players' styles, a three-set match is plausible. Sa...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Panna Udvardy
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Panna Udvardy
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Panna Udvardy
DeepSeek V3
Panna Udvardy
Claude Haiku 4.5
Panna Udvardy
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
79fcf822ef6e61a8…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31782,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Mananchaya Sawangkaew",
"home": "Panna Udvardy"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.