Pablo Llamas RuizvsVitaliy Sachko
VSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz 5/5 models |
over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Both players are relatively low-ranked prospects on the ATP/challenger circuit with limited major-tournament exposure. Llamas Ruiz, a Spanis...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are ranked outside the ATP top 100 and likely to be competitive on hard court without a dominant favorite. Sachko's game style,... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
62%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Pablo Llamas Ruiz holds a slight edge on hard courts from prior seasons per training data through 2025-09. Both players are low-ranked quali...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over 2.5 Qualifier matches at the US Open often extend beyond three sets on hard courts. Both players show inconsistent break-point conversion in rec... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
60%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz This prediction is based on general player profiles from my training data through early 2024, as the match is scheduled for late 2026. Both...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Sets Given that both players are more accustomed to clay and lack a dominant hard-court record, this best-of-5 sets match is likely to be competi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Based on training data, Pablo Llamas Ruiz generally exhibits a higher win rate and better performance metrics on hard courts compared to Vit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 Given that this is a best-of-3 sets match, the probabilities suggest a slight lean towards the match going to a deciding third set. Both pla... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
55%
under 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Training data through 2025-09: Llamas Ruiz has a higher hard-court ceiling and more consistent results at Challenger level, while Sachko is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under 3.5 sets Given the likely physical and stylistic mismatch, Llamas Ruiz should control the baseline rallies and close the match in four sets or fewer.... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusPablo Llamas Ruiz 5/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked prospects on the ATP/challenger circuit with limited major-tournament exposure. Llamas Ruiz, a Spanis...
Pablo Llamas Ruiz holds a slight edge on hard courts from prior seasons per training data through 2025-09. Both players are low-ranked quali...
This prediction is based on general player profiles from my training data through early 2024, as the match is scheduled for late 2026. Both...
Based on training data, Pablo Llamas Ruiz generally exhibits a higher win rate and better performance metrics on hard courts compared to Vit...
Training data through 2025-09: Llamas Ruiz has a higher hard-court ceiling and more consistent results at Challenger level, while Sachko is...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2.5 1/10
Both players are ranked outside the ATP top 100 and likely to be competitive on hard court without a dominant favorite. Sachko's game style,...
Qualifier matches at the US Open often extend beyond three sets on hard courts. Both players show inconsistent break-point conversion in rec...
Given that both players are more accustomed to clay and lack a dominant hard-court record, this best-of-5 sets match is likely to be competi...
Given that this is a best-of-3 sets match, the probabilities suggest a slight lean towards the match going to a deciding third set. Both pla...
Given the likely physical and stylistic mismatch, Llamas Ruiz should control the baseline rallies and close the match in four sets or fewer....
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Claude Haiku 4.5
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Grok 4 Fast
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c428e81eeac1ff72…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 22:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31154,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Vitaliy Sachko",
"home": "Pablo Llamas Ruiz"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.