Pablo Llamas RuizvsLloyd Harris
LHAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Lloyd Harris |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Lloyd Harris Lloyd Harris is a more established ATP player with superior hard-court pedigree and serve-based game suited to US Open conditions. Pablo Lla...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both players operate in the ATP/mid-tier range where matches rarely finish in straight sets at a US Open main draw. Harris's serve is strong... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
62%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Pablo Llamas Ruiz is the younger player with solid hard-court movement from recent seasons; Lloyd Harris has shown inconsistency and injury...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over_2.5 Both players possess strong serves but inconsistent break-point conversion, pushing matches past three sets. Best-of-5 fatigue patterns on h... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Lloyd Harris |
45%
4 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Lloyd Harris Based on training data up to my last update, Lloyd Harris is a strong hard-court player with a powerful serve and forehand, traits that are...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
45%
4 sets While Lloyd Harris is favored due to his hard-court prowess, Pablo Llamas Ruiz's consistent baseline play suggests he has the potential to c... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Pablo Llamas Ruiz is favored due to his generally stronger recent performance and a higher perceived level of play in recent tournaments. Wh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 The match is expected to be closely contested between these two players. A three-set match is more probable than a swift two-set victory for... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Based on training data through 2025-09, Llamas Ruiz has shown more consistent form on hard courts in 2026, while Harris has struggled with i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 Both players possess strong serves and are comfortable on hard courts, suggesting closely contested sets. The match is likely to extend to a... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusPablo Llamas Ruiz 3/5
Lloyd Harris is a more established ATP player with superior hard-court pedigree and serve-based game suited to US Open conditions. Pablo Lla...
Pablo Llamas Ruiz is the younger player with solid hard-court movement from recent seasons; Lloyd Harris has shown inconsistency and injury...
Based on training data up to my last update, Lloyd Harris is a strong hard-court player with a powerful serve and forehand, traits that are...
Pablo Llamas Ruiz is favored due to his generally stronger recent performance and a higher perceived level of play in recent tournaments. Wh...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Llamas Ruiz has shown more consistent form on hard courts in 2026, while Harris has struggled with i...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
Both players operate in the ATP/mid-tier range where matches rarely finish in straight sets at a US Open main draw. Harris's serve is strong...
Both players possess strong serves but inconsistent break-point conversion, pushing matches past three sets. Best-of-5 fatigue patterns on h...
While Lloyd Harris is favored due to his hard-court prowess, Pablo Llamas Ruiz's consistent baseline play suggests he has the potential to c...
The match is expected to be closely contested between these two players. A three-set match is more probable than a swift two-set victory for...
Both players possess strong serves and are comfortable on hard courts, suggesting closely contested sets. The match is likely to extend to a...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Lloyd Harris
DeepSeek V3
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Claude Haiku 4.5
Lloyd Harris
Grok 4 Fast
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
ba81fdfc71988d52…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31702,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T17:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lloyd Harris",
"home": "Pablo Llamas Ruiz"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.