Oliver CrawfordvsLukas Neumayer
LNYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Oliver Crawford 5/5 models |
Over 3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Oliver Crawford |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Oliver Crawford Both players are relatively unknown at the professional level as of my training data (through April 2025); no substantial ATP records exist...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Without detailed head-to-head history or reliable recent form data, I'm defaulting to a slight lean toward a competitive match extending to... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Oliver Crawford |
62%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Oliver Crawford Training data through 2025-09 shows Crawford with modestly better hard-court results and home-country edge at the US Open. No prior h2h meet...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over_3.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates these players often extend matches to four or five sets on hard. Both lack elite finishing power, le... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Oliver Crawford |
55%
Over 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Oliver Crawford Oliver Crawford, an American player, generally performs better on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. While Lukas Neumayer is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 sets Given that both players are capable competitors and it's a Grand Slam best-of-5 match, a competitive encounter spanning at least four sets i... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Oliver Crawford |
58%
Lukas Neumayer |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Oliver Crawford Oliver Crawford is favored based on general training knowledge of their profiles. He tends to perform slightly better on hard courts which i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Lukas Neumayer This match is expected to be closely contested, but Crawford's slight edge suggests he might close it out in two sets. While Neumayer can pu... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Oliver Crawford |
55%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Oliver Crawford Based on training data through 2025-09, Oliver Crawford has shown better hard court form and results in Challenger events compared to Neumay...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 These are lower-ranked players who often play competitive best-of-five matches with multiple close sets. Both have shown tendencies to drop... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusOliver Crawford 5/5
Both players are relatively unknown at the professional level as of my training data (through April 2025); no substantial ATP records exist...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Crawford with modestly better hard-court results and home-country edge at the US Open. No prior h2h meet...
Oliver Crawford, an American player, generally performs better on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. While Lukas Neumayer is...
Oliver Crawford is favored based on general training knowledge of their profiles. He tends to perform slightly better on hard courts which i...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Oliver Crawford has shown better hard court form and results in Challenger events compared to Neumay...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 3.5 1/10
Without detailed head-to-head history or reliable recent form data, I'm defaulting to a slight lean toward a competitive match extending to...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates these players often extend matches to four or five sets on hard. Both lack elite finishing power, le...
Given that both players are capable competitors and it's a Grand Slam best-of-5 match, a competitive encounter spanning at least four sets i...
This match is expected to be closely contested, but Crawford's slight edge suggests he might close it out in two sets. While Neumayer can pu...
These are lower-ranked players who often play competitive best-of-five matches with multiple close sets. Both have shown tendencies to drop...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Oliver Crawford
Claude Haiku 4.5
Oliver Crawford
Grok 4 Fast
Oliver Crawford
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Oliver Crawford
DeepSeek V3
Oliver Crawford
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
60d07cf81a912047…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 19:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30725,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lukas Neumayer",
"home": "Oliver Crawford"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.