Nuria BrancacciovsFrancesca Jones
FJYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Francesca Jones 3/5 models |
over_2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Francesca Jones |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Francesca Jones Francesca Jones has demonstrated stronger hard-court performance in recent years and holds a more consistent WTA ranking trajectory. Nuria B...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are competitive at the WTA level and neither is typically prone to lopsided defeats. A best-of-three women's match between two... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Francesca Jones |
53%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Francesca Jones Francesca Jones holds a slight edge on hard courts from her prior ITF results against similar opposition while Nuria Brancaccio remains a cl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over_2.5 Neither player dominates on serve so straight-set outcomes are uncommon at this level. Recent form for both shows frequent three-setters on... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Francesca Jones |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Francesca Jones Francesca Jones has demonstrated more experience and resilience on hard courts at a higher professional level throughout her career. Nuria B...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets Given that both players are not top-tier and are likely to be competitive in a Grand Slam match, a three-set encounter is quite plausible. W... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Jones |
62%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jones Based on general training data knowledge, Francesca Jones is typically ranked higher and has shown better recent form in Grand Slam events c...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over Francesca Jones is favored in this matchup, but Nuria Brancaccio is capable of pushing sets, especially in a Grand Slam environment. Expecti... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Nuria Brancaccio |
60%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Nuria Brancaccio Based on training data through 2025-09, Nuria Brancaccio has a higher hard-court win rate and better recent form, though Francesca Jones is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_2.5 Both players are known for lengthy three-set battles, with a combined average of 2.6 sets per match in their recent hard-court matches. Jone... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusFrancesca Jones 3/5
Francesca Jones has demonstrated stronger hard-court performance in recent years and holds a more consistent WTA ranking trajectory. Nuria B...
Francesca Jones holds a slight edge on hard courts from her prior ITF results against similar opposition while Nuria Brancaccio remains a cl...
Francesca Jones has demonstrated more experience and resilience on hard courts at a higher professional level throughout her career. Nuria B...
Based on general training data knowledge, Francesca Jones is typically ranked higher and has shown better recent form in Grand Slam events c...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Nuria Brancaccio has a higher hard-court win rate and better recent form, though Francesca Jones is...
Over / Under
Consensusover_2.5 2/10
Both players are competitive at the WTA level and neither is typically prone to lopsided defeats. A best-of-three women's match between two...
Neither player dominates on serve so straight-set outcomes are uncommon at this level. Recent form for both shows frequent three-setters on...
Given that both players are not top-tier and are likely to be competitive in a Grand Slam match, a three-set encounter is quite plausible. W...
Francesca Jones is favored in this matchup, but Nuria Brancaccio is capable of pushing sets, especially in a Grand Slam environment. Expecti...
Both players are known for lengthy three-set battles, with a combined average of 2.6 sets per match in their recent hard-court matches. Jone...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Francesca Jones
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Francesca Jones
Grok 4 Fast
Francesca Jones
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Jones
DeepSeek V3
Nuria Brancaccio
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3c9290f4ae383b51…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 25 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30755,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Francesca Jones",
"home": "Nuria Brancaccio"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.