Noma Noha AkuguevsDenisa Zoldakova
DZAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Noma Noha Akugue 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Noma Noha Akugue |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Noma Noha Akugue Both players are relatively low-ranked WTA competitors with limited public profile in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). Akugue appears to h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Without live form or head-to-head data, I assume this is a best-of-three-sets match typical for WTA. Low-ranked players often produce compet... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Noma Noha Akugue |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Noma Noha Akugue Noma Noha Akugue holds a higher ranking and better recent results on European clay courts entering 2025. Denisa Zoldakova has shown inconsis...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players lack dominant serve stats and convert breaks at moderate rates on clay. Matches between similarly ranked opponents in this tour... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Noma Noha Akugue |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Noma Noha Akugue Based on training data through 2025-09, Noma Noha Akugue is a more established player with a higher professional ranking and more experience...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Given Akugue's presumed superior skill and clay-court prowess, she is expected to win this match relatively comfortably. While upsets can oc... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Noma Noha Akugue |
65%
Denisa Zoldakova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Noma Noha Akugue Noma Noha Akugue is the higher-ranked player and generally performs better on hard courts, which this tournament is played on. Denisa Zoldak...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Denisa Zoldakova While Akugue is favored, Zoldakova is capable of taking a set, especially if Akugue has an off day or Zoldakova finds her rhythm. A two-set... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Noma Noha Akugue |
60%
Over 21.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Noma Noha Akugue Training data through 2025-09. Noma Noha Akugue has shown solid results on clay, often leveraging her aggressive baseline game. Denisa Zolda...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 21.5 Given the likelihood of a competitive three-set match, the total games should exceed 21.5. Players at this level often trade breaks, leading... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusNoma Noha Akugue 5/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked WTA competitors with limited public profile in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). Akugue appears to h...
Noma Noha Akugue holds a higher ranking and better recent results on European clay courts entering 2025. Denisa Zoldakova has shown inconsis...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Noma Noha Akugue is a more established player with a higher professional ranking and more experience...
Noma Noha Akugue is the higher-ranked player and generally performs better on hard courts, which this tournament is played on. Denisa Zoldak...
Training data through 2025-09. Noma Noha Akugue has shown solid results on clay, often leveraging her aggressive baseline game. Denisa Zolda...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Without live form or head-to-head data, I assume this is a best-of-three-sets match typical for WTA. Low-ranked players often produce compet...
Both players lack dominant serve stats and convert breaks at moderate rates on clay. Matches between similarly ranked opponents in this tour...
Given Akugue's presumed superior skill and clay-court prowess, she is expected to win this match relatively comfortably. While upsets can oc...
While Akugue is favored, Zoldakova is capable of taking a set, especially if Akugue has an off day or Zoldakova finds her rhythm. A two-set...
Given the likelihood of a competitive three-set match, the total games should exceed 21.5. Players at this level often trade breaks, leading...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Noma Noha Akugue
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Noma Noha Akugue
Grok 4 Fast
Noma Noha Akugue
DeepSeek V3
Noma Noha Akugue
Claude Haiku 4.5
Noma Noha Akugue
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
73bc105febcafa1f…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 7 · 17:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38941,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Denisa Zoldakova",
"home": "Noma Noha Akugue"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.