Noma Noha AkuguevsAlina Granwehr
AGYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Noma Noha Akugue 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Alina Granwehr |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Alina Granwehr Both players are relatively unknown at the professional level with limited public ranking data available in my training knowledge (through S...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Women's professional tennis on hard courts typically produces competitive sets unless one player is significantly stronger. With no clear ra... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Noma Noha Akugue |
68%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Noma Noha Akugue Training data through 2025-09. Noma Noha Akugue holds the higher ranking and stronger recent results on clay compared to Alina Granwehr. The...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under_2.5 Training data through 2025-09. Akugue's serve and movement should limit breaks, favoring a straight-sets win. Limited head-to-head data and... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Noma Noha Akugue |
60%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Noma Noha Akugue Based on historical performance data, Noma Noha Akugue has shown stronger results on clay courts and generally competes at a higher level th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Noma Noha Akugue's superior clay-court prowess and higher-level experience suggest she is likely to secure a victory in straight sets. While... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Noma Noha Akugue |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Noma Noha Akugue Based on my training data through September 2025, Noma Noha Akugue has a stronger recent performance and a higher ranking than Alina Granweh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over While Akugue is the favorite, Granwehr is capable of taking a set, especially if she can find her rhythm on serve. Given the potential for a... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Noma Noha Akugue |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Noma Noha Akugue Training data through 2025-09: Noma Noha Akugue is a promising young German player with a higher ranking and more WTA experience, while Alin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Given the moderate skill gap, Noha Akugue may win in straight sets, but Granwehr's fighting spirit on home soil could extend the match. ITF-... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusNoma Noha Akugue 4/5
Both players are relatively unknown at the professional level with limited public ranking data available in my training knowledge (through S...
Training data through 2025-09. Noma Noha Akugue holds the higher ranking and stronger recent results on clay compared to Alina Granwehr. The...
Based on historical performance data, Noma Noha Akugue has shown stronger results on clay courts and generally competes at a higher level th...
Based on my training data through September 2025, Noma Noha Akugue has a stronger recent performance and a higher ranking than Alina Granweh...
Training data through 2025-09: Noma Noha Akugue is a promising young German player with a higher ranking and more WTA experience, while Alin...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Women's professional tennis on hard courts typically produces competitive sets unless one player is significantly stronger. With no clear ra...
Training data through 2025-09. Akugue's serve and movement should limit breaks, favoring a straight-sets win. Limited head-to-head data and...
Noma Noha Akugue's superior clay-court prowess and higher-level experience suggest she is likely to secure a victory in straight sets. While...
While Akugue is the favorite, Granwehr is capable of taking a set, especially if she can find her rhythm on serve. Given the potential for a...
Given the moderate skill gap, Noha Akugue may win in straight sets, but Granwehr's fighting spirit on home soil could extend the match. ITF-...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Noma Noha Akugue
Grok 4 Fast
Noma Noha Akugue
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Noma Noha Akugue
DeepSeek V3
Noma Noha Akugue
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alina Granwehr
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d8afa6be1e47e907…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 9 · 16:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39470,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-09T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alina Granwehr",
"home": "Noma Noha Akugue"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.