Noemi BasilettivsMona Barthel
MBYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Mona Barthel 3/4 models |
2 2/8 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Mona Barthel |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Mona Barthel Mona Barthel has far more professional experience and a stronger overall record than Noemi Basiletti. Training data through 2024 shows Barth...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Barthel's superior level should produce a straight-sets win in best-of-3 format. Training data through 2024 indicates her matches against lo... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Mona Barthel |
70%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Mona Barthel Based on historical training data prior to my last update, Mona Barthel has a significantly more established professional career with multip...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under 2.5 Given Mona Barthel's likely superior skill and experience based on historical data, she is expected to win this match in straight sets. It i... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Noemi Basiletti |
60%
Mona Barthel |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Noemi Basiletti Based on training data, Noemi Basiletti is expected to have a slight edge over Mona Barthel. While both players have had varied careers, Bas...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Mona Barthel Given the slight perceived advantage for Noemi Basiletti, the match is projected to be closely contested. A two-set victory for Basiletti is... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
88%
Mona Barthel |
68%
Mona Barthel |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Mona Barthel Training data through 2025-09 only, no live access. Barthel is a former top-25 WTA player and experienced tour veteran while Basiletti is a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
Mona Barthel Given the large ranking/experience gap, a straight-sets win for Barthel is the most likely outcome. Barthel's serve-dominant game on an indo... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMona Barthel 3/4
Mona Barthel has far more professional experience and a stronger overall record than Noemi Basiletti. Training data through 2024 shows Barth...
Based on historical training data prior to my last update, Mona Barthel has a significantly more established professional career with multip...
Based on training data, Noemi Basiletti is expected to have a slight edge over Mona Barthel. While both players have had varied careers, Bas...
Training data through 2025-09 only, no live access. Barthel is a former top-25 WTA player and experienced tour veteran while Basiletti is a...
Over / Under
Consensus2 2/8
Barthel's superior level should produce a straight-sets win in best-of-3 format. Training data through 2024 indicates her matches against lo...
Given Mona Barthel's likely superior skill and experience based on historical data, she is expected to win this match in straight sets. It i...
Given the slight perceived advantage for Noemi Basiletti, the match is projected to be closely contested. A two-set victory for Basiletti is...
Given the large ranking/experience gap, a straight-sets win for Barthel is the most likely outcome. Barthel's serve-dominant game on an indo...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Mona Barthel
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mona Barthel
Grok 4 Fast
Mona Barthel
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Noemi Basiletti
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c839b8dc0a7f70b9…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 19 · 11:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 44845,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Zavarovalnica Triglav Ljubljana",
"starts_at": "2026-09-19T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 19 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Mona Barthel",
"home": "Noemi Basiletti"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.