Nikola BartunkovavsDarja Vidmanova
DVAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Nikola Bartunkova 5/5 models |
2 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Nikola Bartunkova |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Nikola Bartunkova Bartunkova is a Czech player with solid WTA-level experience and typically shows stronger consistency on hard courts, which the Abierto GNP...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 This is a best-of-3 sets match (WTA standard). A straight-sets win (2–0) is the most common outcome in women's tennis, but Bartunkova vs. Vi... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Nikola Bartunkova |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Nikola Bartunkova Nikola Bartunkova holds a slight edge on hard courts based on prior ITF results against similar opposition. Darja Vidmanova has shown incons...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Both players exhibit solid first-serve percentages that limit extended sets in early-round matches. Limited recent form suggests quick point... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Nikola Bartunkova |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Nikola Bartunkova Based on training data up to my last update, Nikola Bartunkova has historically shown a slightly higher ceiling and more consistent performa...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets Given the anticipated close nature of this match between two young, developing players with comparable skill sets on hard courts, a full thr... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Nikola Bartunkova |
60%
Darja Vidmanova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Nikola Bartunkova Based on training data, Nikola Bartunkova has a slight edge over Darja Vidmanova. Bartunkova has shown a more consistent performance in rece...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Darja Vidmanova Given the relatively close predicted outcome in head-to-head, a two-set match is the most probable scenario. While a three-set match is poss... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Nikola Bartunkova |
51%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Nikola Bartunkova Based on training data through 2025-09, Bartunkova has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a more reliable serve and better move...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
Under 2.5 sets Both players are not top-50 level, and their matches often go to three sets due to similar skill levels. However, Bartunkova's superior serv... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusNikola Bartunkova 5/5
Bartunkova is a Czech player with solid WTA-level experience and typically shows stronger consistency on hard courts, which the Abierto GNP...
Nikola Bartunkova holds a slight edge on hard courts based on prior ITF results against similar opposition. Darja Vidmanova has shown incons...
Based on training data up to my last update, Nikola Bartunkova has historically shown a slightly higher ceiling and more consistent performa...
Based on training data, Nikola Bartunkova has a slight edge over Darja Vidmanova. Bartunkova has shown a more consistent performance in rece...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Bartunkova has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with a more reliable serve and better move...
Over / Under
Consensus2 1/10
This is a best-of-3 sets match (WTA standard). A straight-sets win (2–0) is the most common outcome in women's tennis, but Bartunkova vs. Vi...
Both players exhibit solid first-serve percentages that limit extended sets in early-round matches. Limited recent form suggests quick point...
Given the anticipated close nature of this match between two young, developing players with comparable skill sets on hard courts, a full thr...
Given the relatively close predicted outcome in head-to-head, a two-set match is the most probable scenario. While a three-set match is poss...
Both players are not top-50 level, and their matches often go to three sets due to similar skill levels. However, Bartunkova's superior serv...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Nikola Bartunkova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Nikola Bartunkova
Grok 4 Fast
Nikola Bartunkova
DeepSeek V3
Nikola Bartunkova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Nikola Bartunkova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c55e9f8153e6eeeb…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 22:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31697,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T22:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Darja Vidmanova",
"home": "Nikola Bartunkova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.