Nicolai Budkov KjaervsMaks Kasnikowski
MKYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Both players are lower-ranked ATP challengers competing at the US Open, a hard court played in late August. My knowledge cutoff (April 2025)...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 US Open men's singles matches are best-of-5 sets, making Over 2.5 sets a relatively common outcome at this stage (likely an early or mid-rou... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer |
62%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Nicolai Budkov Kjaer is the younger, higher-upside prospect with stronger junior-to-pro transition results on hard courts per training data...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over 2.5 Both players lack dominant serve stats at this level, pointing to extended rallies and likely three-set match. Training knowledge shows simi... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer |
60%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Based on my training data up to its cutoff, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer showed slightly more consistent promising results on hard courts in his jun...
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Sets As two young, developing players with similar profiles on hard courts, their US Open match is likely to be competitive. A best-of-5 encounte...
1 source cited
|
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Based on training data, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer has a stronger historical record and performance profile on hard courts compared to Maks Kasnik...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given the slight edge for Budkov Kjaer and Kasnikowski's potential to push matches, there's a good chance of this match going to four or fiv... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Based on training data through early 2025, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer shows strong junior pedigree and a developing serve that suits hard courts,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 As both players are relatively unproven at the Grand Slam level, a close match is plausible, increasing the chance of it going to four or fi... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusNicolai Budkov Kjaer 5/5
Both players are lower-ranked ATP challengers competing at the US Open, a hard court played in late August. My knowledge cutoff (April 2025)...
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer is the younger, higher-upside prospect with stronger junior-to-pro transition results on hard courts per training data...
Based on my training data up to its cutoff, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer showed slightly more consistent promising results on hard courts in his jun...
Based on training data, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer has a stronger historical record and performance profile on hard courts compared to Maks Kasnik...
Based on training data through early 2025, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer shows strong junior pedigree and a developing serve that suits hard courts,...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
US Open men's singles matches are best-of-5 sets, making Over 2.5 sets a relatively common outcome at this stage (likely an early or mid-rou...
Both players lack dominant serve stats at this level, pointing to extended rallies and likely three-set match. Training knowledge shows simi...
As two young, developing players with similar profiles on hard courts, their US Open match is likely to be competitive. A best-of-5 encounte...
Given the slight edge for Budkov Kjaer and Kasnikowski's potential to push matches, there's a good chance of this match going to four or fiv...
As both players are relatively unproven at the Grand Slam level, a close match is plausible, increasing the chance of it going to four or fi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Claude Haiku 4.5
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
DeepSeek V3
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Grok 4 Fast
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a8d6df7c7e6cacea…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 25 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30798,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Maks Kasnikowski",
"home": "Nicolai Budkov Kjaer"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.