New York Red BullsvsChicago Fire
New York Red Bulls 1–1 Chicago Fire
All 8 AIs backed Chicago Fire — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- Chicago Fire 8/8
- Correct calls
- 0/8
- Final
- 1–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
32 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Chicago Fire 6/8 models |
1-2 6/8 models |
Chicago Fire 8/8 models |
away_away 4/8 models |
over 6/8 models |
yes 6/8 models |
Chicago Fire -1.0 2/8 models |
Chicago Fire 8/8 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
38%
Chicago Fire
L
|
18%
1-2
L
|
42%
Chicago Fire
L
|
29%
Draw / Chicago Fire
L
|
53%
over
L
|
55%
yes
W
|
51%
Chicago Fire +0.25
W
|
48%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
38%
Chicago Fire NYRB concede two per home game so Chicago +1 spread has value but home advantage keeps the pick on the visitors to cover.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-2 Chicago's scoring volume and NYRB defensive leaks point to a 1-2 away win as the single most likely scoreline. Training knowledge through 20...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
42%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire enter with a perfect 5W-0L record and 11 goals scored while New York Red Bulls have won just once in five with 10 conceded. Bot...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
29%
Draw / Chicago Fire Away side's strong finishing suggests they win more often after a level first half. NYRB tend to start slow at home per recent results.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Chicago average 2.2 goals per game in streak while NYRB concede 2.0 per home match. Both teams attack openly so over 2.5 is the lean despite...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes NYRB have failed to keep clean sheets in four of five while Chicago score in every recent outing. Both sides concede regularly so BTTS is pr...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
51%
Chicago Fire +0.25 Chicago's unbeaten run and goal difference edge them on the Asian line despite venue. Half-goal start compensates for any home boost.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
48%
Chicago Fire Away side's scoring rate and defensive record outweigh home poor form. NYRB concede heavily at home so backing Chicago without the draw risk... |
|||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
38%
Chicago Fire
L
|
18%
1-2
L
|
42%
Chicago Fire
L
|
29%
Draw / Chicago Fire
L
|
53%
over
L
|
55%
yes
W
|
51%
Chicago Fire +0.25
W
|
48%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
38%
Chicago Fire NYRB concede two per home game so Chicago +1 spread has value but home advantage keeps the pick on the visitors to cover.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-2 Chicago's scoring volume and NYRB defensive leaks point to a 1-2 away win as the single most likely scoreline. Training knowledge through 20...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
42%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire enter with a perfect 5W-0L record and 11 goals scored while New York Red Bulls have won just once in five with 10 conceded. Bot...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
29%
Draw / Chicago Fire Away side's strong finishing suggests they win more often after a level first half. NYRB tend to start slow at home per recent results.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Chicago average 2.2 goals per game in streak while NYRB concede 2.0 per home match. Both teams attack openly so over 2.5 is the lean despite...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes NYRB have failed to keep clean sheets in four of five while Chicago score in every recent outing. Both sides concede regularly so BTTS is pr...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
51%
Chicago Fire +0.25 Chicago's unbeaten run and goal difference edge them on the Asian line despite venue. Half-goal start compensates for any home boost.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
48%
Chicago Fire Away side's scoring rate and defensive record outweigh home poor form. NYRB concede heavily at home so backing Chicago without the draw risk... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
45%
Chicago Fire -1
L
|
12%
0-2
L
|
60%
Chicago Fire
L
|
35%
Chicago Fire / Chicago Fire
L
|
55%
Over
L
|
60%
No
L
|
45%
Chicago Fire -1.0
L
|
75%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Chicago Fire -1 Given Chicago Fire's dominant attacking form and New York Red Bulls' porous defense, a multi-goal victory for Chicago Fire is a strong possi...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
0-2 Chicago Fire's strong attack (2.2 goals per game) combined with New York Red Bulls' weak defense (2 goals conceded per game) makes a multi-g...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire are in exceptional form with five straight wins, scoring freely and conceding minimally. New York Red Bulls, despite playing at...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Chicago Fire / Chicago Fire Given Chicago Fire's strong form, they are expected to start the match aggressively and take an early lead. Their ability to maintain leads,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over Chicago Fire's attack is prolific, averaging 2.2 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' defense is leaky, conceding 2...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
No Chicago Fire has a relatively solid defense, conceding 0.8 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' offense is strugglin...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Chicago Fire -1.0 Chicago Fire's superior form and offensive output against New York Red Bulls' defensive vulnerabilities make them strong candidates to win b...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
75%
Chicago Fire With Chicago Fire's dominant recent form and New York Red Bulls' struggles, a draw is a less likely outcome. Removing the draw option furthe... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
45%
Chicago Fire -1
L
|
12%
0-2
L
|
60%
Chicago Fire
L
|
35%
Chicago Fire / Chicago Fire
L
|
55%
Over
L
|
60%
No
L
|
45%
Chicago Fire -1.0
L
|
75%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Chicago Fire -1 Given Chicago Fire's dominant attacking form and New York Red Bulls' porous defense, a multi-goal victory for Chicago Fire is a strong possi...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
0-2 Chicago Fire's strong attack (2.2 goals per game) combined with New York Red Bulls' weak defense (2 goals conceded per game) makes a multi-g...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire are in exceptional form with five straight wins, scoring freely and conceding minimally. New York Red Bulls, despite playing at...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Chicago Fire / Chicago Fire Given Chicago Fire's strong form, they are expected to start the match aggressively and take an early lead. Their ability to maintain leads,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over Chicago Fire's attack is prolific, averaging 2.2 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' defense is leaky, conceding 2...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
No Chicago Fire has a relatively solid defense, conceding 0.8 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' offense is strugglin...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Chicago Fire -1.0 Chicago Fire's superior form and offensive output against New York Red Bulls' defensive vulnerabilities make them strong candidates to win b...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
75%
Chicago Fire With Chicago Fire's dominant recent form and New York Red Bulls' struggles, a draw is a less likely outcome. Removing the draw option furthe... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
50%
Chicago Fire
L
|
15%
1-2
L
|
55%
Chicago Fire
L
|
45%
away_away |
52%
over
L
|
55%
yes
W
|
55%
away_ 0.0 |
58%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Chicago Fire While Chicago Fire are in better form, New York Red Bulls at home may pose a tougher challenge than their recent results suggest. However, C...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-2 Considering Chicago Fire's strong recent form and scoring ability, a narrow away win seems plausible. New York Red Bulls may score at home,...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire are in dominant recent form, winning their last five matches, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Head-...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
away_away Chicago Fire's strong current form suggests they could carry their momentum throughout the match. They have the offensive capability to scor...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals recently. Chicago Fire's attack has been potent, while New York Red Bulls' defense has bee...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Chicago Fire's strong attack combined with New York Red Bulls' recent defensive struggles suggests both teams are likely to score. Chicago's...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
away_ 0.0 Chicago Fire's current form and their better head-to-head record against New York Red Bulls make them the favored side. A handicap of 0.0 me...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Chicago Fire Given Chicago Fire's superior recent form and their strong head-to-head record, they are the clear favorites. The draw no bet market account...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
50%
Chicago Fire
L
|
15%
1-2
L
|
55%
Chicago Fire
L
|
45%
away_away |
52%
over
L
|
55%
yes
W
|
55%
away_ 0.0 |
58%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Chicago Fire While Chicago Fire are in better form, New York Red Bulls at home may pose a tougher challenge than their recent results suggest. However, C...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-2 Considering Chicago Fire's strong recent form and scoring ability, a narrow away win seems plausible. New York Red Bulls may score at home,...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire are in dominant recent form, winning their last five matches, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Head-...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
away_away Chicago Fire's strong current form suggests they could carry their momentum throughout the match. They have the offensive capability to scor...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals recently. Chicago Fire's attack has been potent, while New York Red Bulls' defense has bee...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Chicago Fire's strong attack combined with New York Red Bulls' recent defensive struggles suggests both teams are likely to score. Chicago's...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
away_ 0.0 Chicago Fire's current form and their better head-to-head record against New York Red Bulls make them the favored side. A handicap of 0.0 me...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Chicago Fire Given Chicago Fire's superior recent form and their strong head-to-head record, they are the clear favorites. The draw no bet market account...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
40%
Chicago Fire
L
|
15%
1-2
L
|
45%
Chicago Fire
L
|
25%
away_away |
60%
over
L
|
55%
yes
W
|
45%
Chicago Fire -0.5
L
|
55%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Chicago Fire Chicago's recent victories have often been by multiple goals, suggesting they can cover a -1 spread. New York's poor form and leaky defense...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-2 Given Chicago's scoring and New York's defensive issues, a 2-1 away win is plausible. However, New York may also score, leading to a high-sc...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire are on a five-match winning streak with 11 goals scored, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Despite pl...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
away_away Chicago are likely to lead at half-time given their strong scoring start. They also have the stamina to maintain the lead, though New York m...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Chicago have scored 11 in five matches and New York have conceded 10, indicating goal-friendly dynamics. Both teams have averaged over 2.5 t...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both teams have shown scoring ability, with Chicago averaging 2.2 goals per game and New York scoring in most matches despite defeats. New Y...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Chicago Fire -0.5 Chicago's form and attacking quality make them favorites to win outright. A -0.5 handicap aligns with the h2h away pick. New York's home adv...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire's strong form and superior attacking output make them the likely winner in a no-draw scenario. New York's defensive frailty (10... |
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
40%
Chicago Fire
L
|
15%
1-2
L
|
45%
Chicago Fire
L
|
25%
away_away |
60%
over
L
|
55%
yes
W
|
45%
Chicago Fire -0.5
L
|
55%
Chicago Fire |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Chicago Fire Chicago's recent victories have often been by multiple goals, suggesting they can cover a -1 spread. New York's poor form and leaky defense...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-2 Given Chicago's scoring and New York's defensive issues, a 2-1 away win is plausible. However, New York may also score, leading to a high-sc...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire are on a five-match winning streak with 11 goals scored, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Despite pl...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
away_away Chicago are likely to lead at half-time given their strong scoring start. They also have the stamina to maintain the lead, though New York m...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Chicago have scored 11 in five matches and New York have conceded 10, indicating goal-friendly dynamics. Both teams have averaged over 2.5 t...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both teams have shown scoring ability, with Chicago averaging 2.2 goals per game and New York scoring in most matches despite defeats. New Y...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Chicago Fire -0.5 Chicago's form and attacking quality make them favorites to win outright. A -0.5 handicap aligns with the h2h away pick. New York's home adv...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Chicago Fire Chicago Fire's strong form and superior attacking output make them the likely winner in a no-draw scenario. New York's defensive frailty (10... |
|||||||||
Spread
ConsensusChicago Fire 6/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
38%
Chicago Fire
L
NYRB concede two per home game so Chicago +1 spread has value but home advantage keeps the pick on the visitors to cover.
Grok 4 Fast
38%
Chicago Fire
L
NYRB concede two per home game so Chicago +1 spread has value but home advantage keeps the pick on the visitors to cover.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Chicago Fire -1
L
Given Chicago Fire's dominant attacking form and New York Red Bulls' porous defense, a multi-goal victory for Chicago Fire is a strong possi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Chicago Fire -1
L
Given Chicago Fire's dominant attacking form and New York Red Bulls' porous defense, a multi-goal victory for Chicago Fire is a strong possi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
50%
Chicago Fire
L
While Chicago Fire are in better form, New York Red Bulls at home may pose a tougher challenge than their recent results suggest. However, C...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
50%
Chicago Fire
L
While Chicago Fire are in better form, New York Red Bulls at home may pose a tougher challenge than their recent results suggest. However, C...
DeepSeek V3
40%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago's recent victories have often been by multiple goals, suggesting they can cover a -1 spread. New York's poor form and leaky defense...
DeepSeek V3
40%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago's recent victories have often been by multiple goals, suggesting they can cover a -1 spread. New York's poor form and leaky defense...
Correct score
Consensus1-2 6/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
18%
1-2
L
Chicago's scoring volume and NYRB defensive leaks point to a 1-2 away win as the single most likely scoreline. Training knowledge through 20...
Grok 4 Fast
18%
1-2
L
Chicago's scoring volume and NYRB defensive leaks point to a 1-2 away win as the single most likely scoreline. Training knowledge through 20...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
12%
0-2
L
Chicago Fire's strong attack (2.2 goals per game) combined with New York Red Bulls' weak defense (2 goals conceded per game) makes a multi-g...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
12%
0-2
L
Chicago Fire's strong attack (2.2 goals per game) combined with New York Red Bulls' weak defense (2 goals conceded per game) makes a multi-g...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
1-2
L
Considering Chicago Fire's strong recent form and scoring ability, a narrow away win seems plausible. New York Red Bulls may score at home,...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
1-2
L
Considering Chicago Fire's strong recent form and scoring ability, a narrow away win seems plausible. New York Red Bulls may score at home,...
DeepSeek V3
15%
1-2
L
Given Chicago's scoring and New York's defensive issues, a 2-1 away win is plausible. However, New York may also score, leading to a high-sc...
DeepSeek V3
15%
1-2
L
Given Chicago's scoring and New York's defensive issues, a 2-1 away win is plausible. However, New York may also score, leading to a high-sc...
Match winner
ConsensusChicago Fire 8/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
42%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire enter with a perfect 5W-0L record and 11 goals scored while New York Red Bulls have won just once in five with 10 conceded. Bot...
Grok 4 Fast
42%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire enter with a perfect 5W-0L record and 11 goals scored while New York Red Bulls have won just once in five with 10 conceded. Bot...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire are in exceptional form with five straight wins, scoring freely and conceding minimally. New York Red Bulls, despite playing at...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire are in exceptional form with five straight wins, scoring freely and conceding minimally. New York Red Bulls, despite playing at...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire are in dominant recent form, winning their last five matches, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Head-...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire are in dominant recent form, winning their last five matches, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Head-...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire are on a five-match winning streak with 11 goals scored, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Despite pl...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Chicago Fire
L
Chicago Fire are on a five-match winning streak with 11 goals scored, while New York Red Bulls have lost four of their last five. Despite pl...
Half-time / Full-time
Consensusaway_away 4/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
29%
Draw / Chicago Fire
L
Away side's strong finishing suggests they win more often after a level first half. NYRB tend to start slow at home per recent results.
Grok 4 Fast
29%
Draw / Chicago Fire
L
Away side's strong finishing suggests they win more often after a level first half. NYRB tend to start slow at home per recent results.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
35%
Chicago Fire / Chicago Fire
L
Given Chicago Fire's strong form, they are expected to start the match aggressively and take an early lead. Their ability to maintain leads,...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
35%
Chicago Fire / Chicago Fire
L
Given Chicago Fire's strong form, they are expected to start the match aggressively and take an early lead. Their ability to maintain leads,...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
45%
away_away
Chicago Fire's strong current form suggests they could carry their momentum throughout the match. They have the offensive capability to scor...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
45%
away_away
Chicago Fire's strong current form suggests they could carry their momentum throughout the match. They have the offensive capability to scor...
DeepSeek V3
25%
away_away
Chicago are likely to lead at half-time given their strong scoring start. They also have the stamina to maintain the lead, though New York m...
DeepSeek V3
25%
away_away
Chicago are likely to lead at half-time given their strong scoring start. They also have the stamina to maintain the lead, though New York m...
Over / Under
Consensusover 6/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
53%
over
L
Chicago average 2.2 goals per game in streak while NYRB concede 2.0 per home match. Both teams attack openly so over 2.5 is the lean despite...
Grok 4 Fast
53%
over
L
Chicago average 2.2 goals per game in streak while NYRB concede 2.0 per home match. Both teams attack openly so over 2.5 is the lean despite...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Over
L
Chicago Fire's attack is prolific, averaging 2.2 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' defense is leaky, conceding 2...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Over
L
Chicago Fire's attack is prolific, averaging 2.2 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' defense is leaky, conceding 2...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
52%
over
L
Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals recently. Chicago Fire's attack has been potent, while New York Red Bulls' defense has bee...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
52%
over
L
Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals recently. Chicago Fire's attack has been potent, while New York Red Bulls' defense has bee...
DeepSeek V3
60%
over
L
Chicago have scored 11 in five matches and New York have conceded 10, indicating goal-friendly dynamics. Both teams have averaged over 2.5 t...
DeepSeek V3
60%
over
L
Chicago have scored 11 in five matches and New York have conceded 10, indicating goal-friendly dynamics. Both teams have averaged over 2.5 t...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 6/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
55%
yes
W
NYRB have failed to keep clean sheets in four of five while Chicago score in every recent outing. Both sides concede regularly so BTTS is pr...
Grok 4 Fast
55%
yes
W
NYRB have failed to keep clean sheets in four of five while Chicago score in every recent outing. Both sides concede regularly so BTTS is pr...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
No
L
Chicago Fire has a relatively solid defense, conceding 0.8 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' offense is strugglin...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
No
L
Chicago Fire has a relatively solid defense, conceding 0.8 goals per game in their last five, while New York Red Bulls' offense is strugglin...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
yes
W
Chicago Fire's strong attack combined with New York Red Bulls' recent defensive struggles suggests both teams are likely to score. Chicago's...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
yes
W
Chicago Fire's strong attack combined with New York Red Bulls' recent defensive struggles suggests both teams are likely to score. Chicago's...
DeepSeek V3
55%
yes
W
Both teams have shown scoring ability, with Chicago averaging 2.2 goals per game and New York scoring in most matches despite defeats. New Y...
DeepSeek V3
55%
yes
W
Both teams have shown scoring ability, with Chicago averaging 2.2 goals per game and New York scoring in most matches despite defeats. New Y...
Asian handicap
ConsensusChicago Fire -1.0 2/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
51%
Chicago Fire +0.25
W
Chicago's unbeaten run and goal difference edge them on the Asian line despite venue. Half-goal start compensates for any home boost.
Grok 4 Fast
51%
Chicago Fire +0.25
W
Chicago's unbeaten run and goal difference edge them on the Asian line despite venue. Half-goal start compensates for any home boost.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Chicago Fire -1.0
L
Chicago Fire's superior form and offensive output against New York Red Bulls' defensive vulnerabilities make them strong candidates to win b...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Chicago Fire -1.0
L
Chicago Fire's superior form and offensive output against New York Red Bulls' defensive vulnerabilities make them strong candidates to win b...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
away_ 0.0
Chicago Fire's current form and their better head-to-head record against New York Red Bulls make them the favored side. A handicap of 0.0 me...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
away_ 0.0
Chicago Fire's current form and their better head-to-head record against New York Red Bulls make them the favored side. A handicap of 0.0 me...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Chicago Fire -0.5
L
Chicago's form and attacking quality make them favorites to win outright. A -0.5 handicap aligns with the h2h away pick. New York's home adv...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Chicago Fire -0.5
L
Chicago's form and attacking quality make them favorites to win outright. A -0.5 handicap aligns with the h2h away pick. New York's home adv...
Draw no bet
ConsensusChicago Fire 8/8
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
Chicago Fire
Away side's scoring rate and defensive record outweigh home poor form. NYRB concede heavily at home so backing Chicago without the draw risk...
Grok 4 Fast
48%
Chicago Fire
Away side's scoring rate and defensive record outweigh home poor form. NYRB concede heavily at home so backing Chicago without the draw risk...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
75%
Chicago Fire
With Chicago Fire's dominant recent form and New York Red Bulls' struggles, a draw is a less likely outcome. Removing the draw option furthe...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
75%
Chicago Fire
With Chicago Fire's dominant recent form and New York Red Bulls' struggles, a draw is a less likely outcome. Removing the draw option furthe...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
Chicago Fire
Given Chicago Fire's superior recent form and their strong head-to-head record, they are the clear favorites. The draw no bet market account...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
Chicago Fire
Given Chicago Fire's superior recent form and their strong head-to-head record, they are the clear favorites. The draw no bet market account...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire's strong form and superior attacking output make them the likely winner in a no-draw scenario. New York's defensive frailty (10...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire's strong form and superior attacking output make them the likely winner in a no-draw scenario. New York's defensive frailty (10...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago Fire
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago Fire
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Fire
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Fire
DeepSeek V3
Chicago Fire
DeepSeek V3
Chicago Fire
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Fire
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Fire
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
49dac7fa622f917f…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 01:30 GMT+0200
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29721,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Sports Illustrated Stadium",
"league": "Major League Soccer",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T23:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 23:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Fire",
"home": "New York Red Bulls"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWW",
"record": "5W-0D-0L",
"scored": 11,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 4
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWLL",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 5,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 10
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 3,
"home": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.