New York RangersvsNew York Islanders
NYYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/4 models |
New York Rangers 4/4 models |
New York Rangers 2/4 models |
New York Rangers 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
over |
57%
New York Rangers |
54%
New York Rangers |
49%
New York Rangers |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Training data through 2025-09 indicates early-season or exhibition games trend slightly higher scoring. Rangers-Islanders matchups often fea...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
New York Rangers Training data through 2025-09 shows Rangers hold home-ice edge at MSG against divisional foes. Islanders road form has been inconsistent whi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
New York Rangers Rangers historically cover at home in this matchup per pre-2026 data. Islanders struggle on the road against Metro division opponents. Expec...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
49%
New York Rangers Rangers tend to start strong at MSG in training data. First period in these rivalry games leans toward home team or low scoring. Islanders r... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Under 6.5 |
55%
New York Rangers |
70%
New York Islanders +1.5 |
40%
Draw |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 6.5 The 'Battle of New York' frequently features tight-checking, defensive hockey. Both teams historically boast strong goaltending and often pl...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
New York Rangers Based on historical team strengths within my training data and the home-ice advantage for the Rangers at Madison Square Garden. Rivalry game...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
New York Islanders +1.5 Given the expectation of a close, low-scoring rivalry game, it's difficult for any team to win by more than one goal. The Islanders are like...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
40%
Draw Intense rivalry games often start cautiously as teams feel each other out in the opening period. Both the Rangers and Islanders are known fo... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
over |
65%
New York Rangers |
55%
New York Rangers |
57%
New York Rangers |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over While both teams can play defensively, the Rangers' offensive firepower suggests a higher-scoring game. The Islanders' ability to generate o...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
New York Rangers The Rangers have a strong historical advantage over the Islanders, winning the majority of their matchups. Playing at Madison Square Garden...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
New York Rangers Given the Rangers' historical dominance and home-ice advantage, they are favored to win by more than one goal. Their offensive depth should...
3 sources cited
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
57%
New York Rangers The Rangers often start games strong, especially at home, and their offensive capabilities are evident from the opening puck drop. While the...
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
53%
Under 6.0 |
52%
New York Rangers |
55%
New York Islanders +1.5 |
35%
New York Rangers 1st-period lead |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Under 6.0 Both clubs historically ride structured, low-event styles, particularly in the early weeks of a season before defensive details sharpen. The...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
New York Rangers No live access, so this is from training data through 2025-09 plus a projection for the 2026-27 season opener, which falls before any real f...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
New York Islanders +1.5 Puck-line favorites cover 1.5 only about 40-45% of the time, and a rivalry opener is even less likely to be a blowout. The Islanders' defens...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
35%
New York Rangers 1st-period lead First periods in season openers are the most unpredictable quarter of the game; a tied first period is the modal outcome with slight home-ic... |
|||||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/4
Training data through 2025-09 indicates early-season or exhibition games trend slightly higher scoring. Rangers-Islanders matchups often fea...
The 'Battle of New York' frequently features tight-checking, defensive hockey. Both teams historically boast strong goaltending and often pl...
While both teams can play defensively, the Rangers' offensive firepower suggests a higher-scoring game. The Islanders' ability to generate o...
Both clubs historically ride structured, low-event styles, particularly in the early weeks of a season before defensive details sharpen. The...
Match winner
ConsensusNew York Rangers 4/4
Training data through 2025-09 shows Rangers hold home-ice edge at MSG against divisional foes. Islanders road form has been inconsistent whi...
Based on historical team strengths within my training data and the home-ice advantage for the Rangers at Madison Square Garden. Rivalry game...
The Rangers have a strong historical advantage over the Islanders, winning the majority of their matchups. Playing at Madison Square Garden...
No live access, so this is from training data through 2025-09 plus a projection for the 2026-27 season opener, which falls before any real f...
Spread
ConsensusNew York Rangers 2/4
Rangers historically cover at home in this matchup per pre-2026 data. Islanders struggle on the road against Metro division opponents. Expec...
Given the expectation of a close, low-scoring rivalry game, it's difficult for any team to win by more than one goal. The Islanders are like...
Given the Rangers' historical dominance and home-ice advantage, they are favored to win by more than one goal. Their offensive depth should...
Puck-line favorites cover 1.5 only about 40-45% of the time, and a rivalry opener is even less likely to be a blowout. The Islanders' defens...
First period winner
ConsensusNew York Rangers 2/4
Rangers tend to start strong at MSG in training data. First period in these rivalry games leans toward home team or low scoring. Islanders r...
Intense rivalry games often start cautiously as teams feel each other out in the opening period. Both the Rangers and Islanders are known fo...
The Rangers often start games strong, especially at home, and their offensive capabilities are evident from the opening puck drop. While the...
First periods in season openers are the most unpredictable quarter of the game; a tied first period is the modal outcome with slight home-ic...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
New York Rangers
Grok 4 Fast
New York Rangers
Gemini 2.5 Flash
New York Rangers
DeepSeek V3
New York Rangers
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6d6f9fa3f7dc442e…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 22 · 23:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First period winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_period
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 46411,
"sport": "ice-hockey",
"venue": "Madison Square Garden",
"league": "NHL",
"starts_at": "2026-09-22T23:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "New York Islanders",
"home": "New York Rangers"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Confirm the starting goaltender and their recent save% — a backup or a cold starter swings the line and total.",
"Special teams decide tight games: compare power-play and penalty-kill percentages.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause goalie/skater fatigue — flag the schedule spot.",
"Weigh recent scoring trends and home/road splits; injuries to top-six forwards or a top pairing matter most."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_period"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.