Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · Citi Field
Upcoming · in 81h 06m
New York Mets logo

New York MetsvsLos Angeles Dodgers

Los Angeles Dodgers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 8.5

The Mets' recent pattern (38 runs in 5 games, averaging 7.6 per match) and Dodgers' offensive capability (20 in 5 games, 4 per match) sugges...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% over

Citi Field typically plays as a neutral-to-slightly hitter-friendly park and both clubs have run-producing bats; Yamamoto limits damage but...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% over

Both teams have shown offensive capabilities this season, with the Dodgers averaging 5.2 runs per game and the Mets 4.1 runs per game. This...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

July conditions at Citi Field typically allow moderate run scoring when wind is neutral. Dodgers offense projects for higher run total than...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Over 8.5

The New York Mets' recent form indicates exceptionally high-scoring games, both offensively and defensively, with 47 runs conceded in their...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

While both starting pitchers are strong, the Dodgers have a potent offense and the Mets' recent scoring has been high. The park factors at C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
5 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over 8.5

Both teams have shown recent offensive output (Dodgers 20 runs in 5 games, Mets 38 in 5). The Mets' bullpen has been shaky. Citi Field is ne...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5

The Dodgers' run-differential discipline (20-19, implying close, controlled games) combined with their 3W-2L form suggests they win by narro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% away_ -1.5

Given the probable Yamamoto start and a deeper lineup, the Dodgers are likelier to win by multiple runs than the Mets are to narrowly edge t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% Los Angeles Dodgers

Given the Dodgers' superior record and performance metrics, they are likely to cover a -1 spread against the Mets.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Los Angeles Dodgers

Dodgers starting rotation edge supports covering a standard run line on the road. Mets recent home form shows defensive inconsistencies agai...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5

Building on the H2H prediction, the Los Angeles Dodgers' overall strength and consistent performance, combined with the Mets' recent tendenc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Los Angeles Dodgers

Given the slight edge in head-to-head and recent form for the Dodgers, coupled with their offensive capabilities, they are favored to win by...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
5 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 48% Los Angeles Dodgers -1.5

The Dodgers are the better team but winning by 2+ is never easy on the road. The Mets have been competitive in recent games. The spread is t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 4.5 (first 5 innings runs total)

Early-inning pitching is typically tighter for both teams, with bullpens fresh and batters less settled. The Dodgers' controlled run differe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers

The first-five innings favor the Dodgers because Yamamoto tends to produce quality early-outing results and limit early scoring, while the M...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers' strong season performance suggests they are likely to lead after the first five innings against the Mets.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Los Angeles Dodgers

Early game advantage tilts to Dodgers given superior top-of-lineup production against right-handed starters. Mets have historically struggle...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Los Angeles Dodgers

Without specific starting pitcher information, I am relying on the general strength of the Los Angeles Dodgers and their more stable recent...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers' starting pitcher is projected to be strong, likely giving them an early edge. The Mets' offense has been hot but early innings...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Los Angeles Dodgers 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers have superior recent form with 3W-2L over their last 5 and a defensive record suggesting better execution (20 scored, 19 concede...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Los Angeles Dodgers

Projected starting pitchers (Yoshinobu Yamamoto for LAD vs Sean Manaea for NYM) and the Dodgers' stronger run prevention and lineup depth fa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Los Angeles Dodgers have a superior record (63-37) compared to the New York Mets (42-58). The Dodgers' strong performance this season su...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Los Angeles Dodgers

Dodgers hold superior roster depth and pitching staff relative to Mets based on historical performance trends. Citi Field favors pitchers bu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Los Angeles Dodgers

Based on general team strength from my training data through 2025-09, the Los Angeles Dodgers are a consistently strong contender. The Mets'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers' recent form is slightly better than the Mets', and their head-to-head record this season favors them. Walker Buehler, the expec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
5 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Los Angeles Dodgers

The Dodgers have a stronger overall roster and superior pitching depth. The Mets' home advantage at Citi Field is slightly offset by rest pa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings 4.5

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

Both starting pitchers are known for strong starts, but the Dodgers and Mets offenses have demonstrated the ability to score early. The matc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
5 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Los Angeles Dodgers

75
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Los Angeles Dodgers

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Los Angeles Dodgers

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Los Angeles Dodgers

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Los Angeles Dodgers

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Los Angeles Dodgers

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Los Angeles Dodgers

54

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1052–798 · 57%
-601.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 688–582 · 54%
-361.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1124–1107 · 50%
-921.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 738–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1025–1049 · 49%
-740.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 873–924 · 49%
-722.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1013–1089 · 48%
-926.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: c2fe3bd8a2e70d46…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 24 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 15215,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Citi Field",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-24T23:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Los Angeles Dodgers",
        "home": "New York Mets"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WLWLW",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 20,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 19
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WLWWL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 38,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 47
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 15,
            "home": 16
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →