Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 5–10
New York Mets logo

New York MetsvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final5–10 Locked 28picks · 18 graded
Recap Consensus missed

New York Mets 5–10 Chicago Cubs

6 of 7 AIs leaned New York Mets — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
New York Mets 6/7
Correct calls
1/7
Final
5–10

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
New York Mets 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% New York Mets L

Both teams are evenly matched in mid-season form as of my training data (through September 2025), but the Mets have slight home-field advant...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% New York Mets L

With the game at Citi Field (an open-air but generally pitcher-friendly park) and the Cubs' season-long starting-rotation instability and IL...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% New York Mets L

The New York Mets have a strong home record and have been performing well recently, while the Chicago Cubs have struggled on the road. Addit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% New York Mets L

Training data through 2025 shows Mets with stronger home record and better overall pitching depth against NL Central teams. Cubs have strugg...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% New York Mets L

This prediction is based on general team strengths and historical performance up to my training data cutoff, as no live information for June...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Chicago Cubs W

The Chicago Cubs have been historically strong against the New York Mets, and based on training data, they tend to perform well on the road...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 57% New York Mets L

Mets have a strong home record and deeper pitching rotation. Cubs are inconsistent on the road. Expected tight game but Mets' bullpen edge g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Spread

Consensus
New York Mets -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% New York Mets -1 L

A -1 run line for the home team reflects modest home-field advantage plus marginal offensive/pitching edge. The Mets' slight favoritism alig...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% New York Mets -1.5 L

Given home advantage, the Mets' pitching profile at Citi Field and the Cubs' rotation inconsistency, I project the Mets slightly more likely...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% New York Mets L

The Mets have been winning by an average of 2 runs in their recent home games, suggesting they are likely to cover the -1.5 spread. However,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 49% New York Mets -1.5 L

Mets hold a slight edge in starting pitching matchups from historical data, but Cubs have shown resilience covering run lines on the road. E...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Chicago Cubs +1.5 W

Even with a slight lean towards the Mets for the outright win, baseball games are often decided by one run, making the -1.5 run line a diffi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs W

While the head-to-head record favors the Cubs, a -1.5 spread indicates a need for a more convincing win. Given the historical data and typic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 31% New York Mets -1.5 L

Mets likely win by 1 run margin, making the run line a risky cover. Cubs bullpen has improved. Spread probability leans to underdog cover.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 8.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over 8.5

MLB regular-season totals in June typically trend toward moderate run environments (8–9 runs per game average). The Mets and Cubs both have...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% over W

Team-level snapshots (CBS gametracker) show the Cubs and Mets combining for roughly mid-to-high single-digit runs per game; Cubs bring more...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% under L

Both teams have been averaging fewer than 9.5 runs per game in their recent matchups, and both have strong pitching rotations that should li...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

June games in New York tend to produce higher run totals due to warmer weather and hitter-friendly conditions. Both teams have lineups capab...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over 8.5 W

Without specific starting pitcher information or current team offensive/defensive forms for June 2026, predicting game totals is challenging...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 62% over W

Both teams have offenses that, on average, contribute to games with a moderate number of runs. Considering their recent offensive trends fro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both teams have mid-tier offenses and projected starters allowing runs. Wind conditions could favor hitting at Citi Field. Expect around 9 r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

First 5 innings

Consensus
New York Mets 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Under 4.5

First-five-inning totals in MLB tend to be suppressed relative to full-game totals because batters are seeing fresh arms and pitcher command...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% New York Mets

Because starting-pitching reliability favors the Mets on balance (and Citi Field suppresses long balls to some extent), I expect the Mets to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Mets

The Mets have been strong in the first five innings at home, often taking early leads. The Cubs have struggled to score early in away games,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% New York Mets

Mets have historically performed well in the opening innings at home with strong top-of-order production. Cubs early-game offense has been b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% New York Mets

First five innings outcomes are highly dependent on starting pitching, which is unknown for this future date in June 2026. This prediction r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% New York Mets

Mets' starter has strong first-half splits, while Cubs starter tends to fade in early innings. Home advantage in first five should tilt to M...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

First five innings over

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 59% over

Historically, games involving the Cubs and Mets often see a reasonable amount of scoring in the first five innings. Both teams have shown pe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

New York Mets

60
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

New York Mets

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

New York Mets

57
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

New York Mets

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

New York Mets

53
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

New York Mets

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1032–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: ce9215929ddb5ff7…
Kickoff
Wed, Jun 24 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 5929,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-24T23:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 24 Jun 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "New York Mets"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-21T05:54:24+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →