Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 6–9
New York Mets logo

New York MetsvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final6–9 Locked 28picks · 18 graded AIs split
Recap Consensus called it

New York Mets 6–9 Chicago Cubs

4 of 7 AIs leaned Chicago Cubs — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Correct calls
4/7
Final
6–9

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 48% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

This is a marginal call in a single game between two competitive franchises. The Cubs hold a slight structural advantage based on recent dec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

Given the Cubs' recent offensive surge and Senga's inconsistency, Chicago has a reasonable chance to win by multiple runs, but Cabrera's vol...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% New York Mets L

While the Mets are favored to win, the game is expected to be close, making the -1.5 spread a risky bet. The confidence is split evenly due...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% New York Mets -1.5 L

Training data through 2025-09 shows the Mets performing adequately at home against Cubs. Run-line value leans home in even pitching matchups...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 45% New York Mets -1.5 L

While picking the Mets to win outright, covering the -1.5 run line against a competitive Cubs team is more challenging. This pick assumes th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs W

Given the slight historical advantage for the Cubs in head-to-head matchups, they are marginally more likely to cover a -1.5 run line spread...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Chicago Cubs -1.5 W

Cubs have narrow margins and Mets are competitive at home, making a multi-run win less likely.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Chicago Cubs W

As of my training data (through September 2025), the Cubs have maintained stronger overall roster depth and more consistent winning records...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Chicago Cubs W

Chicago arrives in better form (recent multi-run outbursts) and faces a Mets starter (Kodai Senga) who has struggled this season (9.00 ERA)...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Mets L

The New York Mets have a strong home record this season, and the Chicago Cubs have struggled on the road. Additionally, the Mets have a favo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% New York Mets L

Training data through 2025-09 shows both clubs as mid-tier with similar overall talent. Home field in 2026 favors the Mets slightly in June....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% New York Mets L

Based on general MLB trends and historical performance up to my training data cutoff, the Mets get a slight edge playing at home. Without sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs W

Based on training data, the Chicago Cubs generally hold a slight edge over the New York Mets. While specific recent form is unavailable, his...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Chicago Cubs W

Based on training data through 2025 season, Cubs have strong pitching depth and Mets are inconsistent. Recent form favors Cubs, though home...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 8.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5 W

Both the Mets and Cubs have historically featured offensive lineups with decent run-scoring potential, though pitching quality varies. Late...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Over 8.5

Both probable starters carry red flags: Senga has a very high ERA and allowed early damage in his return, while Cabrera has had at least one...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% under L

Both teams have been averaging fewer than 9.5 runs per game in their recent matchups, and both have strong pitching rotations that are likel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Training data through 2025-09 indicates Mets-Cubs meetings trend toward moderate scoring. June weather in New York typically allows average...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Over 8.5 W

Given the lack of specific 2026 pitching data, a slight lean towards the Over is made, assuming average offensive output from both teams. ML...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over W

The total of 2.5 runs for a baseball game is very low, implying that games between these teams tend to be higher scoring. My training data i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% under 8.5

Both teams have solid starting pitching expected; recent games show low-scoring trends. Weather at Citi Field often suppresses offense in Ju...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Chicago Cubs

First five innings outcomes are often driven by starting pitcher quality and early offensive momentum. Without access to 2026 starter names,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Chicago Cubs

Senga has shown in recent starts that he can be susceptible to early damage (allowed several runs in early frames in his return), while the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Mets

The Mets have been strong in the first five innings in recent games, and the Cubs have struggled early in games. This trend suggests the Met...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% New York Mets

Training data through 2025-09 shows early-game edges often mirror full-game home advantage. Both starters project as average in historical J...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% New York Mets

Predicting the Mets to hold a lead after the first five innings aligns with the home advantage sentiment for the full game. This heavily rel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs

The Chicago Cubs often start games strong, and historical data suggests they tend to lead or be competitive through the first five innings a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Chicago Cubs

Cubs' starting pitcher has strong early-game numbers; Mets' lineup tends to struggle against left-handed pitching early. Bullpen edge less r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago Cubs

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

55
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

New York Mets

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Chicago Cubs

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

New York Mets

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

New York Mets

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1032–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 255945a178af4d77…
Kickoff
Tue, Jun 23 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 5720,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-23T23:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 23 Jun 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "New York Mets"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-20T05:53:23+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →