Neil OberleitnervsHugo Grenier
HGYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Hugo Grenier 3/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Neil Oberleitner |
55%
Over 21.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Neil Oberleitner Both players are relatively unknown at ATP level; Neil Oberleitner and Hugo Grenier are likely competing in qualifying or lower-tier rounds...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 21.5 If the match goes to a competitive two or three-set format (as favored above), total games will likely exceed 21.5. Hard-court tennis at thi... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Hugo Grenier |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Hugo Grenier Hugo Grenier holds superior hard-court experience and recent ATP-level results compared to Neil Oberleitner. Oberleitner lacks consistent wi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Grenier favored to win in straight sets given ranking and surface edge. Both players show efficient serving that limits extended rallies on... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Hugo Grenier |
65%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Hugo Grenier Based on my training data up to my last update, Hugo Grenier consistently ranks significantly higher and has more experience on the ATP Tour...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 sets Given the expected disparity in skill and experience between Grenier and Oberleitner, a straight-sets victory for the higher-ranked player,... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Neil Oberleitner |
52%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Neil Oberleitner Based on my training data, Neil Oberleitner has a slightly better historical performance profile on hard courts compared to Hugo Grenier. Wh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over This is projected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar standing. Given the potential for a tight contest and the r... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Hugo Grenier |
60%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Hugo Grenier Based on my training data through 2025-09, Grenier is generally ranked higher and has more experience on the ATP Tour, especially on hard co...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Given the expected dominance of Grenier, he is likely to win in straight sets. Oberleitner may struggle to hold serve consistently against a... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusHugo Grenier 3/5
Both players are relatively unknown at ATP level; Neil Oberleitner and Hugo Grenier are likely competing in qualifying or lower-tier rounds...
Hugo Grenier holds superior hard-court experience and recent ATP-level results compared to Neil Oberleitner. Oberleitner lacks consistent wi...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Hugo Grenier consistently ranks significantly higher and has more experience on the ATP Tour...
Based on my training data, Neil Oberleitner has a slightly better historical performance profile on hard courts compared to Hugo Grenier. Wh...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Grenier is generally ranked higher and has more experience on the ATP Tour, especially on hard co...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
If the match goes to a competitive two or three-set format (as favored above), total games will likely exceed 21.5. Hard-court tennis at thi...
Grenier favored to win in straight sets given ranking and surface edge. Both players show efficient serving that limits extended rallies on...
Given the expected disparity in skill and experience between Grenier and Oberleitner, a straight-sets victory for the higher-ranked player,...
This is projected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar standing. Given the potential for a tight contest and the r...
Given the expected dominance of Grenier, he is likely to win in straight sets. Oberleitner may struggle to hold serve consistently against a...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Hugo Grenier
Grok 4 Fast
Hugo Grenier
DeepSeek V3
Hugo Grenier
Claude Haiku 4.5
Neil Oberleitner
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Neil Oberleitner
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fa6470e0894b7156…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29750,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Hugo Grenier",
"home": "Neil Oberleitner"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.