Nao HibinovsLucie Havlickova
LHAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Nao Hibino 3/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Nao Hibino |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Nao Hibino Nao Hibino is a Japanese player with solid hard-court credentials and has competed regularly on the WTA circuit, while Lucie Havlickova is a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Both players are professional WTA competitors, so a 2–0 blowout is less likely than a competitive match that reaches at least three sets. Hi... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Nao Hibino |
58%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Nao Hibino Nao Hibino holds more experience on hard courts at Grand Slams than the younger Lucie Havlickova. Training data through 2025-09 shows Hibino...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under 2.5 Best-of-3 format at US Open favors the more experienced player closing in straight sets. Hibino's historical efficiency against lower-ranked... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Lucie Havlickova |
52%
3 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Lucie Havlickova Based on training data up to my knowledge cutoff, Lucie Havlickova's powerful and aggressive playing style is expected to be well-suited for...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
3 Sets Given the potential for a competitive encounter between Havlickova's aggressive game and Hibino's consistent defense, a three-set match is s... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
61%
Havlickova |
57%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
61%
Havlickova Lucie Havlickova is a rising junior talent who has shown promise on hard courts, while Nao Hibino is a more experienced player but has had i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
over Given that Havlickova is a strong challenger and Hibino is an experienced but potentially inconsistent player, this match has the potential... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Nao Hibino |
60%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Nao Hibino Based on training data through 2025-09, Nao Hibino has generally been a more seasoned WTA player with better hard-court results and a strong...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_2.5 Both players have similar levels and Hibino is not an overwhelming favorite, suggesting a competitive match that could extend to three sets.... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusNao Hibino 3/5
Nao Hibino is a Japanese player with solid hard-court credentials and has competed regularly on the WTA circuit, while Lucie Havlickova is a...
Nao Hibino holds more experience on hard courts at Grand Slams than the younger Lucie Havlickova. Training data through 2025-09 shows Hibino...
Based on training data up to my knowledge cutoff, Lucie Havlickova's powerful and aggressive playing style is expected to be well-suited for...
Lucie Havlickova is a rising junior talent who has shown promise on hard courts, while Nao Hibino is a more experienced player but has had i...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Nao Hibino has generally been a more seasoned WTA player with better hard-court results and a strong...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both players are professional WTA competitors, so a 2–0 blowout is less likely than a competitive match that reaches at least three sets. Hi...
Best-of-3 format at US Open favors the more experienced player closing in straight sets. Hibino's historical efficiency against lower-ranked...
Given the potential for a competitive encounter between Havlickova's aggressive game and Hibino's consistent defense, a three-set match is s...
Given that Havlickova is a strong challenger and Hibino is an experienced but potentially inconsistent player, this match has the potential...
Both players have similar levels and Hibino is not an overwhelming favorite, suggesting a competitive match that could extend to three sets....
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Nao Hibino
Grok 4 Fast
Nao Hibino
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Havlickova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Nao Hibino
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Lucie Havlickova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
21bb38d1eba93dc9…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31691,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T16:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lucie Havlickova",
"home": "Nao Hibino"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.