MSV DuisburgvsSV Elversberg
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Draw 2/4 models |
SV Elversberg 2/4 models |
over 4/4 models |
yes 4/4 models |
SV Elversberg 2/4 models |
SV Elversberg 2/4 models |
SV Elversberg / SV Elversberg 2/4 models |
1-2 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
40%
Draw |
60%
SV Elversberg |
70%
over |
70%
yes |
60%
SV Elversberg |
60%
SV Elversberg |
60%
SV Elversberg / SV Elversberg |
20%
1-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
40%
Draw Both teams have shown similar recent form, with Duisburg securing two wins and two draws in their last five matches, and Elversberg achievin...
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
SV Elversberg Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede goals in recent matches, with Duisburg averaging 2.17 goals scored and 1.42 goals conc...
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
70%
yes Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede goals in recent matches, with Duisburg averaging 2.17 goals scored and 1.42 goals conc...
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
SV Elversberg Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
SV Elversberg Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
60%
SV Elversberg / SV Elversberg Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
1-2 Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
🔍 researched
9 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
48%
SV Elversberg |
55%
SV Elversberg |
52%
over |
53%
yes |
47%
away_ -1 |
51%
away_ -0.5 |
38%
SV Elversberg / SV Elversberg |
18%
1-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
48%
SV Elversberg Elversberg enter with superior squad depth and recent promotion momentum while Duisburg remain mired in the lower tiers. Training data throu...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
SV Elversberg Duisburg have conceded in four of their last five while Elversberg average over two goals per game on the road. Training data through 2025-0...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both sides average above 2.5 goals in recent outings and cup ties tend to open up. Training data through 2025-09 shows Elversberg matches fr...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
53%
yes Duisburg concede regularly at home and Elversberg score freely away. Training data through 2025-09 records BTTS in over half of similar cup...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
47%
away_ -1 Elversberg are the stronger side and should cover a one-goal handicap on the road. Training data through 2025-09 shows they regularly win by...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
51%
away_ -0.5 Away side quality edge translates to an Asian handicap lean. Training data through 2025-09 highlights Elversberg consistency versus regional...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
SV Elversberg / SV Elversberg Elversberg typically start steadily and pull away after the interval. Training data through 2025-09 shows away/away as the most common outco...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-2 Narrow away win aligns with squad gap and recent scoring patterns. Training data through 2025-09 shows 1-2 as the modal scoreline in compara... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
40%
Draw |
40%
Draw |
55%
over |
60%
yes |
50%
SV Elversberg |
52%
SV Elversberg |
30%
Draw / Draw |
15%
1-1 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
40%
Draw Both teams have similar recent form, with both showing a tendency to draw in their last five matches. Given that this is a DFB Pokal match a...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
40%
Draw As with the head-to-head market, the recent form and the nature of a cup tie suggest a closely contested match. The draw probability remains...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have a decent scoring record in their last five matches, with MSV Duisburg scoring 10 and SV Elversberg scoring 12. Their defensi...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes The offensive and defensive statistics for both teams in their last five games indicate that both are capable of scoring and conceding. MSV...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
SV Elversberg SV Elversberg's slightly better recent form and offensive output (12 goals in 5 games) suggest they have a slight edge. A -1 handicap is ris...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
SV Elversberg Considering SV Elversberg's slightly better recent form and scoring consistency, they are the favored side. Even with a small handicap, they...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / Draw Given the balanced form and likelihood of a tight contest, a draw at halftime followed by a draw at fulltime seems plausible. Neither team h...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-1 With similar scoring and conceding rates, and a high probability of BTTS and Over 2.5, a scoreline of 1-1 appears to be the most balanced ou... |
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
45%
MSV Duisburg |
55%
MSV Duisburg |
55%
over |
60%
yes |
35%
MSV Duisburg -1 |
50%
MSV Duisburg -0.25 |
30%
MSV Duisburg / MSV Duisburg |
10%
2-1 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
MSV Duisburg MSV Duisburg have home advantage and slightly better recent form (2W-2D-1L) with a solid attacking output. SV Elversberg are competitive but...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
MSV Duisburg With the draw removed, home win is more likely given home advantage and similar form. Both teams are evenly matched but Duisburg's home supp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently: Duisburg scored 10 in 5, Elversberg scored 12 in 5. Defensive records are mode...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Both teams have attacking momentum: Duisburg scored 10 in 5, Elversberg 12 in 5. Defenses are not solid (home conceded 7, away conceded 6)....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
35%
MSV Duisburg -1 Duisburg are favored at home but the match is expected to be close. A one-goal margin is plausible but not certain. Given the even form, the...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
MSV Duisburg -0.25 Duisburg have a slight edge at home, so a minor handicap on them seems reasonable. The quarter-goal line provides a safety net in case of a...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
MSV Duisburg / MSV Duisburg Home team are likely to start strongly and maintain their lead, but cup matches can be unpredictable. The most probable outcome is a home wi...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
10%
2-1 Given the attacking strengths and defensive weaknesses, a 2-1 home win is a plausible outcome. Other close scorelines like 1-1 and 2-0 also... |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusDraw 2/4
Both teams have shown similar recent form, with Duisburg securing two wins and two draws in their last five matches, and Elversberg achievin...
Elversberg enter with superior squad depth and recent promotion momentum while Duisburg remain mired in the lower tiers. Training data throu...
Both teams have similar recent form, with both showing a tendency to draw in their last five matches. Given that this is a DFB Pokal match a...
MSV Duisburg have home advantage and slightly better recent form (2W-2D-1L) with a solid attacking output. SV Elversberg are competitive but...
Draw no bet
ConsensusSV Elversberg 2/4
Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
Duisburg have conceded in four of their last five while Elversberg average over two goals per game on the road. Training data through 2025-0...
As with the head-to-head market, the recent form and the nature of a cup tie suggest a closely contested match. The draw probability remains...
With the draw removed, home win is more likely given home advantage and similar form. Both teams are evenly matched but Duisburg's home supp...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/4
Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede goals in recent matches, with Duisburg averaging 2.17 goals scored and 1.42 goals conc...
Both sides average above 2.5 goals in recent outings and cup ties tend to open up. Training data through 2025-09 shows Elversberg matches fr...
Both teams have a decent scoring record in their last five matches, with MSV Duisburg scoring 10 and SV Elversberg scoring 12. Their defensi...
Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently: Duisburg scored 10 in 5, Elversberg scored 12 in 5. Defensive records are mode...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 4/4
Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede goals in recent matches, with Duisburg averaging 2.17 goals scored and 1.42 goals conc...
Duisburg concede regularly at home and Elversberg score freely away. Training data through 2025-09 records BTTS in over half of similar cup...
The offensive and defensive statistics for both teams in their last five games indicate that both are capable of scoring and conceding. MSV...
Both teams have attacking momentum: Duisburg scored 10 in 5, Elversberg 12 in 5. Defenses are not solid (home conceded 7, away conceded 6)....
Spread
ConsensusSV Elversberg 2/4
Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
Elversberg are the stronger side and should cover a one-goal handicap on the road. Training data through 2025-09 shows they regularly win by...
SV Elversberg's slightly better recent form and offensive output (12 goals in 5 games) suggest they have a slight edge. A -1 handicap is ris...
Duisburg are favored at home but the match is expected to be close. A one-goal margin is plausible but not certain. Given the even form, the...
Asian handicap
ConsensusSV Elversberg 2/4
Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
Away side quality edge translates to an Asian handicap lean. Training data through 2025-09 highlights Elversberg consistency versus regional...
Considering SV Elversberg's slightly better recent form and scoring consistency, they are the favored side. Even with a small handicap, they...
Duisburg have a slight edge at home, so a minor handicap on them seems reasonable. The quarter-goal line provides a safety net in case of a...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusSV Elversberg / SV Elversberg 2/4
Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
Elversberg typically start steadily and pull away after the interval. Training data through 2025-09 shows away/away as the most common outco...
Given the balanced form and likelihood of a tight contest, a draw at halftime followed by a draw at fulltime seems plausible. Neither team h...
Home team are likely to start strongly and maintain their lead, but cup matches can be unpredictable. The most probable outcome is a home wi...
Correct score
Consensus1-2 2/4
Elversberg's superior squad depth and recent form, including a 4-1 victory over Ligue 1's Lorient, suggest they have the edge over Duisburg....
Narrow away win aligns with squad gap and recent scoring patterns. Training data through 2025-09 shows 1-2 as the modal scoreline in compara...
With similar scoring and conceding rates, and a high probability of BTTS and Over 2.5, a scoreline of 1-1 appears to be the most balanced ou...
Given the attacking strengths and defensive weaknesses, a 2-1 home win is a plausible outcome. Other close scorelines like 1-1 and 2-0 also...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
SV Elversberg
DeepSeek V3
MSV Duisburg
GPT-4o Mini
Draw
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Draw
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8a18c96e17fdde09…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 13:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 28890,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Schauinsland-Reisen-Arena",
"league": "DFB Pokal",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T13:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "SV Elversberg",
"home": "MSV Duisburg"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WDWWL",
"record": "3W-1D-1L",
"scored": 12,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 6
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWDDL",
"record": "2W-2D-1L",
"scored": 10,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 7
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 7,
"home": 6
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
8 tool calls · 9 sources
9 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.