Montréal CanadiensvsToronto Maple Leafs
TMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Toronto Maple Leafs 3/4 models |
Over 5.5 2/4 models |
Toronto Maple Leafs 2/4 models |
Draw 3/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Toronto Maple Leafs |
51%
over |
49%
Toronto Maple Leafs |
38%
Draw |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Toronto Maple Leafs Training data through 2023 shows Toronto typically edges Montreal in talent depth despite road status. Montreal benefits from home ice at Ce...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Training data through 2023 indicates these matchups average slightly above 6.5 goals when played at Centre Bell. Both teams feature offensiv...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
49%
Toronto Maple Leafs Training data through 2023 shows Montreal covers the puckline at home more often than not against Toronto. Toronto's road performance agains...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
38%
Draw Training data through 2023 shows first periods in this matchup frequently end scoreless or tied due to cautious starts. Both teams emphasize... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Toronto Maple Leafs |
52%
Over 5.5 |
67%
Montréal Canadiens +1.5 |
40%
Draw |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Toronto Maple Leafs Based on historical performance trends and general team strengths from training data through 2023-04, the Toronto Maple Leafs typically poss...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 5.5 The Toronto Maple Leafs are known for their high-powered offense, which frequently contributes to higher-scoring games. While rivalry games...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
67%
Montréal Canadiens +1.5 Despite Toronto often having the talent advantage, games against rival Montréal, especially at Centre Bell, are historically very competitiv...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
40%
Draw Early season games, especially intense rivalry matchups, can often start cautiously as teams find their rhythm and try to avoid early mistak... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Toronto Maple Leafs |
60%
over |
65%
Toronto Maple Leafs |
55%
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Toronto Maple Leafs The Toronto Maple Leafs have a strong historical advantage in head-to-head matchups and consistently finish the season with a superior recor...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have strong offensive capabilities, and their recent games suggest a tendency towards higher scoring. The Maple Leafs' consistent...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Toronto Maple Leafs Given the Maple Leafs' superior form and historical dominance, they are likely to win by more than one goal. Their ability to control games...
4 sources cited
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
55%
Toronto Maple Leafs The Maple Leafs often start games strong, capitalizing on their offensive talent early. Their recent trend of scoring in the first period, c...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
44%
Montréal Canadiens |
52%
Over 5.5 |
24%
Montréal Canadiens -1.5 |
40%
Draw |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
44%
Montréal Canadiens Training data through early 2025 only; this September 2026 opener is well beyond that window, so this is a structural prior rather than curr...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 5.5 No live data available; based on training knowledge through early 2025. Toronto games have consistently been among the higher-event contests...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
24%
Montréal Canadiens -1.5 Training data only through early 2025; predicting a puck-line outcome for a September 2026 opener is inherently low-confidence. Puck-line fa...
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
40%
Draw No live access; using training knowledge through early 2025. First periods in NHL openers tend to be cautious, with teams feeling each other... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusToronto Maple Leafs 3/4
Training data through 2023 shows Toronto typically edges Montreal in talent depth despite road status. Montreal benefits from home ice at Ce...
Based on historical performance trends and general team strengths from training data through 2023-04, the Toronto Maple Leafs typically poss...
The Toronto Maple Leafs have a strong historical advantage in head-to-head matchups and consistently finish the season with a superior recor...
Training data through early 2025 only; this September 2026 opener is well beyond that window, so this is a structural prior rather than curr...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 5.5 2/4
Training data through 2023 indicates these matchups average slightly above 6.5 goals when played at Centre Bell. Both teams feature offensiv...
The Toronto Maple Leafs are known for their high-powered offense, which frequently contributes to higher-scoring games. While rivalry games...
Both teams have strong offensive capabilities, and their recent games suggest a tendency towards higher scoring. The Maple Leafs' consistent...
No live data available; based on training knowledge through early 2025. Toronto games have consistently been among the higher-event contests...
Spread
ConsensusToronto Maple Leafs 2/4
Training data through 2023 shows Montreal covers the puckline at home more often than not against Toronto. Toronto's road performance agains...
Despite Toronto often having the talent advantage, games against rival Montréal, especially at Centre Bell, are historically very competitiv...
Given the Maple Leafs' superior form and historical dominance, they are likely to win by more than one goal. Their ability to control games...
Training data only through early 2025; predicting a puck-line outcome for a September 2026 opener is inherently low-confidence. Puck-line fa...
First period winner
ConsensusDraw 3/4
Training data through 2023 shows first periods in this matchup frequently end scoreless or tied due to cautious starts. Both teams emphasize...
Early season games, especially intense rivalry matchups, can often start cautiously as teams find their rhythm and try to avoid early mistak...
The Maple Leafs often start games strong, capitalizing on their offensive talent early. Their recent trend of scoring in the first period, c...
No live access; using training knowledge through early 2025. First periods in NHL openers tend to be cautious, with teams feeling each other...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Toronto Maple Leafs
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Toronto Maple Leafs
Grok 4 Fast
Toronto Maple Leafs
DeepSeek V3
Montréal Canadiens
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8f945cfeb0111337…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 19 · 23:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First period winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_period
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 44164,
"sport": "ice-hockey",
"venue": "Centre Bell",
"league": "NHL",
"starts_at": "2026-09-19T23:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 19 Sep 2026 23:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Toronto Maple Leafs",
"home": "Montréal Canadiens"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Confirm the starting goaltender and their recent save% — a backup or a cold starter swings the line and total.",
"Special teams decide tight games: compare power-play and penalty-kill percentages.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause goalie/skater fatigue — flag the schedule spot.",
"Weigh recent scoring trends and home/road splits; injuries to top-six forwards or a top pairing matter most."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_period"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.