Minnesota Twins vs St.Louis Cardinals
Final: 5 – 4
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
80112d64ad70ca1b…
- Sport
- Sun, Jun 14 · 18:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- h2h · totals · spreads · first_five_innings
- Source
- The Odds API · live
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 2758,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-14T18:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 14 Jun 2026 18:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "St.Louis Cardinals",
"home": "Minnesota Twins"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-14T00:29:19+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic · 4-5 -1.2u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 5-5 -0.3u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 125-128 -87.1u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 168-149 -107.9u |
55%
Over 8.5
V
|
54%
Minnesota Twins -1.5
V
|
56%
Under 4.5
V
|
58%
Minnesota Twins
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both the Twins and Cardinals are mid-tier offensive teams with capable lineups and bullpens that can be inconsistent. A Sunday afternoon mat...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins' home-field advantage and slightly superior roster depth support a small run spread in their favor. A run-and-a-half spread is mod...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Under 4.5 First-five-innings markets are typically lower-scoring affairs because starting pitchers are fresh and the bullpen hasn't been taxed yet. Ca...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have been a stronger offensive team in recent seasons with better run production and bullpen depth. St. Louis has competitive rost... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 30-17 +24.4u |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 34-47 -25.2u |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Heavy FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 112-170 -91.3u |
51%
over
V
|
52%
home_-1.5
V
|
53%
Minnesota Twins
V
|
54%
Minnesota Twins
L
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Average pitching matchups expected; Twins park plays neutral to hitter-friendly. Historical Cardinals games trend slightly over total. Train...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
home_-1.5 Home favorite status gives Twins -1.5 value in projected close game. Cardinals bullpen fatigue patterns noted in prior seasons. Training kno...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Minnesota Twins Early game edge to home starter; Twins lineup historically stronger in first five frames. Cardinals slower starts on road per past data. Tra...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Minnesota Twins Twins hold slight home edge in neutral matchup; both clubs project as middling .500 teams per training data through 2025-09. Cardinals road... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro FlagshipGoogle · 4-7 -1.8u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 135-151 -121.4u |
48%
Over 8.5
W
|
48%
Minnesota Twins -1.5
V
|
50%
Minnesota Twins
V
|
50%
Minnesota Twins
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
48%
Over 8.5 Historical MLB scoring trends and the general offensive capabilities of both teams, based on information up to my training data cutoff, sugg...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Given the general competitive balance of the teams and the speculative H2H pick for the Twins, predicting a win by more than one run is a fu...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Minnesota Twins Based on the general historical competitive standing of both teams and the home-field advantage for the Minnesota Twins, they are marginally...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
50%
Minnesota Twins Based on general historical team performance trends up to my training data cutoff, both teams are competitive in MLB. The Minnesota Twins re... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 65-141 -96.1u |
52%
over
V
|
53%
St.Louis Cardinals
V
|
54%
Minnesota Twins
V
|
55%
Minnesota Twins
L
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Without specific pitching matchups or recent scoring trends, it's difficult to make a definitive call. However, MLB games often see a modera...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
St.Louis Cardinals Given the slight favor towards the home team in head-to-head, predicting the spread requires considering potential upsets or close games. Th...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Minnesota Twins Early game performance is often influenced by starting pitchers and initial offensive momentum. The home team typically starts stronger due...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins Based on my training data, the Minnesota Twins generally perform well at home. While specific recent form for this exact matchup is unavaila... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 136-147 -106.2u |
52%
Over 8.5
V
|
40%
Minnesota Twins -1.5
V
|
48%
Minnesota Twins
V
|
55%
Minnesota Twins
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Both bullpens are mediocre and temperatures are moderate, favoring scoring. Recent head-to-head games in Minnesota have averaged over 9 runs...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 While the Twins are favored, covering the -1.5 run line requires a comfortable win. The Cardinals have kept games close recently, making the...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
48%
Minnesota Twins The Cardinals' starting pitching has been slightly better early in games, while the Twins' offense tends to heat up later. First 5 innings c...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have a strong home record and recent offensive surge, while the Cardinals have inconsistent pitching and key injuries. Training da... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Over 8.5 3/6 |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 4/6 |
Minnesota Twins 4/6 |
Minnesota Twins 6/6 |
|
Ask the AIs · Post-match analysis
Reverse-engineer the match
Ask any AI to explain what happened or grade the consensus call.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.