Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Upcoming · in 86h 58m
Minnesota Twins logo

Minnesota Twins vs Colorado Rockies

Colorado Rockies logo

Kickoff · Sat, Jun 27 · 23:10 GMT+0000

Picks locked at Jun 24 · 05:50 GMT+0000 24 picks recorded
Chat with the AIs about this match Pick the frontier models — Claude, GPT-5, Gemini, Grok & more — and watch them answer side by side, live, on the same brief.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: c86e23001b503767…
Kickoff
Sat, Jun 27 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 7059,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-27T23:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 27 Jun 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Colorado Rockies",
        "home": "Minnesota Twins"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-24T05:50:28+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

4 markets · 6 models picked

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Minnesota Twins -1.5 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Minnesota Twins -1.5

The Twins' superior pitching depth and offensive consistency give them a modest edge in a run-line scenario. While Coors amplifies scoring,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Colorado Rockies

The Rockies' recent form and the Twins' home-field advantage make this a balanced matchup, with the Rockies slightly favored to cover the sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Minnesota Twins -1.5

Twins expected to win by multiple runs given talent gap. Rockies struggle on the road against better competition. Based solely on training k...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Minnesota Twins -1.5

Building on the H2H analysis, if the Minnesota Twins are favored to win, they often do so by more than a single run, especially against team...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Minnesota Twins

The Twins are favored to win, and while the spread of -1 run is tight, their overall stronger performance and home-field advantage give them...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Minnesota Twins -1.5

The Twins should win, but covering a 1.5-run spread is less certain. Their offense is consistent, but the Rockies can sometimes keep games c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Minnesota Twins 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Minnesota Twins

Early-inning advantage typically favors teams with stronger starting pitchers and leadoff hitters. The Twins' top-of-order production and pi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Colorado Rockies

The Rockies have shown strong early-game performances, suggesting they may lead after the first five innings.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 59% Minnesota Twins

Twins starting pitching edge should hold through the first five innings. Rockies lineups have been slow starters historically. Prediction dr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 68% Minnesota Twins F5 Win

The Minnesota Twins, playing at home, are expected to have an advantage in the early innings, typically driven by their starting pitcher and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Minnesota Twins

The Twins' starting pitcher is expected to perform well early in the game, and their offense has been known to start strong. The Rockies' pi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Minnesota Twins

Twins' starting rotation is generally better than the Rockies'. Home starter advantage and early offensive support should give them an edge...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Over 8.5

Coors Field is one of baseball's most hitter-friendly parks due to altitude and thin air, historically inflating run totals by 10–15% versus...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, suggesting a likelihood of a total score exceeding 2.5 runs.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over

Colorado Rockies games trend toward higher run totals due to poor pitching staff. Twins offense adds to scoring potential at home. Training...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under 8.5

The Colorado Rockies' offense traditionally performs poorly away from the hitter-friendly conditions of Coors Field, often leading to lower-...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Both teams have offenses capable of scoring runs, and while Coors Field can be a pitcher's park at times, it also offers favorable hitting c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over 8.5

Target Field is neutral for scoring, but both pitching staffs are average. The Rockies' bullpen is often weak, and the Twins' lineup can pro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Minnesota Twins 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Minnesota Twins

The Twins are a stronger franchise with superior recent performance and depth compared to the Rockies, particularly in June when Minnesota t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Colorado Rockies

The Minnesota Twins have a slightly better record and home-field advantage, but the Colorado Rockies have shown resilience in recent games,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% Minnesota Twins

Minnesota Twins have historically been the stronger franchise with better pitching and offense compared to the Rockies. Training data throug...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 68% Minnesota Twins

Based on historical team profiles from my training data through 2025-09, the Minnesota Twins are generally a more robust team, especially wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Minnesota Twins

The Minnesota Twins are generally a stronger team than the Colorado Rockies, especially when considering home-field advantage and recent per...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Minnesota Twins

The Twins have a stronger overall roster and home-field advantage. The Rockies struggle on the road, especially outside of Coors Field. Base...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Share this prediction

Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →