Minnesota TwinsvsCleveland Guardians
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 5/5 models |
over 3/5 models |
Minnesota Twins 3/5 models |
Minnesota Twins 4/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
Under 8.5 |
62%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
65%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Minnesota Twins The Twins arrive with strong recent form (4W-1L over last 5), outscoring Cleveland 28–16 and showing defensive solidity. Cleveland has colla...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 8.5 While the Twins have scored well (5.6 runs/game last 5), Cleveland's weak offense (3.4 runs/game) and solid defense is the key. Target Field...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
62%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins' recent form and run differential strongly suggest a win by 1–2 runs is the most likely outcome. Cleveland's weak offense and losi...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
65%
Minnesota Twins Early-inning scoring often tracks overall offensive strength. The Twins' hot bats (5.6 RPG) should dominate Cleveland's weak lineup (3.4 RPG... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
56%
Minnesota Twins |
51%
over |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Minnesota Twins Twins enter with superior recent form (WWWWL) compared to Guardians (LLLLW) and own the last two head-to-head meetings at home. Target Field...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Moderate home offense and average pitching matchup point to a game slightly above the typical 8.5-run total. Twins recent scoring pace suppo...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Minnesota Twins Home edge and better recent results give Minnesota a modest edge on the run line. Guardians road struggles limit their ability to cover. Pre...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Minnesota Twins Early innings typically mirror overall home advantage and Twins offensive edge. Limited bullpen data keeps the margin narrow. Prediction dra... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over_8.5 |
58%
home_ -1.5 |
60%
home_lead |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins are in excellent recent form, winning four of their last five matches and outscoring opponents significantly. They also...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_8.5 The Minnesota Twins have been scoring well in their recent games, averaging 5.6 runs, while the Guardians have conceded an average of 4.4 ru...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
home_ -1.5 Given the Minnesota Twins' strong recent performance and their two consecutive wins over the Guardians, they are favored to win by more than...
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
home_lead The Minnesota Twins' superior recent form, both offensively and defensively, suggests they are likely to take an early lead in this matchup....
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
over |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins are in significantly better recent form, winning four of their last five games compared to the Cleveland Guardians' one...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities with the Twins scoring 28 runs and the Guardians scoring 17 runs in their last five games. The...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Minnesota Twins Given the Twins' superior recent form and their recent success against the Guardians, they are slightly favored to cover the -1 spread. Thei...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins' strong recent form extends to their ability to start games well, as indicated by their overall better performance. Coup... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Minnesota Twins Twins have won 4 of their last 5 and took both recent meetings at Target Field. Guardians are on a 4-game losing streak, and with no live da...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have been scoring and conceding at a decent clip recently, with the Guardians putting up 17 runs in their last 5 and the Twins 28...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Minnesota Twins I'm backing the Twins to cover a -1.5 run line given their recent form and home advantage. The Guardians have been struggling, and the Twins...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have been strong early in games, and the Guardians have shown slow starts during their losing streak. Starting pitching likely fav... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/5
The Twins arrive with strong recent form (4W-1L over last 5), outscoring Cleveland 28–16 and showing defensive solidity. Cleveland has colla...
Twins enter with superior recent form (WWWWL) compared to Guardians (LLLLW) and own the last two head-to-head meetings at home. Target Field...
The Minnesota Twins are in excellent recent form, winning four of their last five matches and outscoring opponents significantly. They also...
The Minnesota Twins are in significantly better recent form, winning four of their last five games compared to the Cleveland Guardians' one...
Twins have won 4 of their last 5 and took both recent meetings at Target Field. Guardians are on a 4-game losing streak, and with no live da...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/5
While the Twins have scored well (5.6 runs/game last 5), Cleveland's weak offense (3.4 runs/game) and solid defense is the key. Target Field...
Moderate home offense and average pitching matchup point to a game slightly above the typical 8.5-run total. Twins recent scoring pace suppo...
The Minnesota Twins have been scoring well in their recent games, averaging 5.6 runs, while the Guardians have conceded an average of 4.4 ru...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities with the Twins scoring 28 runs and the Guardians scoring 17 runs in their last five games. The...
Both teams have been scoring and conceding at a decent clip recently, with the Guardians putting up 17 runs in their last 5 and the Twins 28...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 3/5
The Twins' recent form and run differential strongly suggest a win by 1–2 runs is the most likely outcome. Cleveland's weak offense and losi...
Home edge and better recent results give Minnesota a modest edge on the run line. Guardians road struggles limit their ability to cover. Pre...
Given the Minnesota Twins' strong recent performance and their two consecutive wins over the Guardians, they are favored to win by more than...
Given the Twins' superior recent form and their recent success against the Guardians, they are slightly favored to cover the -1 spread. Thei...
I'm backing the Twins to cover a -1.5 run line given their recent form and home advantage. The Guardians have been struggling, and the Twins...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 4/5
Early-inning scoring often tracks overall offensive strength. The Twins' hot bats (5.6 RPG) should dominate Cleveland's weak lineup (3.4 RPG...
Early innings typically mirror overall home advantage and Twins offensive edge. Limited bullpen data keeps the margin narrow. Prediction dra...
The Minnesota Twins' superior recent form, both offensively and defensively, suggests they are likely to take an early lead in this matchup....
The Minnesota Twins' strong recent form extends to their ability to start games well, as indicated by their overall better performance. Coup...
The Twins have been strong early in games, and the Guardians have shown slow starts during their losing streak. Starting pitching likely fav...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
23f1e1ee283709ec…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 12 · 00:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39457,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Target Field",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-12T00:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cleveland Guardians",
"home": "Minnesota Twins"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLLLW",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 17,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 65,
"home": 65
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-07-08: Minnesota Twins 6–5 Cleveland Guardians",
"2026-07-07: Minnesota Twins 3–1 Cleveland Guardians"
],
"matches": 2
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.