Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Target Field
Upcoming · in 82h 04m
Minnesota Twins logo

Minnesota TwinsvsBaltimore Orioles

Baltimore Orioles logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Minnesota Twins 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Twins -1.5

The Twins' 4-1 recent record, superior run differential (+12 vs Baltimore's -6), rest advantage, and home-field position at Target Field jus...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 38% Minnesota Twins -1.5

Taking the Twins -1.5 (win by 2+) has some appeal because Minnesota's recent home form is strong and Matthews can eat innings, but baseball...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Baltimore Orioles

Given the Orioles' slightly better recent form and away record, they are favored to cover the -1 spread. The confidence is moderate due to t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Minnesota Twins

Minnesota's strong home record and better defensive form suggest they cover a modest spread. Orioles poor recent results increase fade value...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% home_ -1.5

As I am predicting from training data through 2025-09 and lacking specific matchup details for this future game, I'll project the Twins' sup...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Baltimore Orioles

While the Orioles have a slight edge in starting pitching, the Twins' strong recent form and home-field advantage make this a close contest....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Minnesota Twins

The Twins have been dominant at home recently and should win by a margin sufficient for the run line. The Orioles are on a losing streak and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Minnesota Twins 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over 4.5

Early-inning scoring often reflects starter quality and top-of-order momentum. The Twins' recent offensive consistency (averaging 5.6 RPG) a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Minnesota Twins

First-five innings lean with Minnesota because Zebby Matthews has produced multiple multi-inning quality starts this season and the Twins' o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Baltimore Orioles

The Orioles' recent form and away performance suggest they may have the edge in the early innings. The confidence is moderate due to the clo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Minnesota Twins

Starting pitcher edge and home ballpark factors lean Twins in early innings. Recent form disparity supports home lead after five. Training d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Minnesota Twins

Without specific starting pitcher information due to the future date, I'm basing this prediction on the overall team strength shown in the p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

The early innings often see the best from both starting pitchers, but the Orioles' offense has been strong in the early going of games. Comb...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 56% Minnesota Twins

The Twins' starting pitcher is in better form and has a strong strikeout rate, which should limit the Orioles in the early innings. The Orio...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Minnesota Twins 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 68% Minnesota Twins

The Twins enter with strong recent form (4W-1L over last 5) and a significant rest advantage (34 days vs Baltimore's 20), which typically tr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Minnesota Twins

Minnesota gets the home start in a matchup where the Twins have stronger recent home form (per the brief) and the probable-starter matchup (...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Baltimore Orioles

The Orioles have a slightly better recent form, with a 7-3 record in their last 10 games, compared to the Twins' 6-4. Additionally, the Orio...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Minnesota Twins

Twins enter with superior recent form of 4 wins in last 5 compared to Orioles 1 win. Home team also concedes fewer runs on average. Training...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Minnesota Twins

Predicting from training data through 2025-09, I must rely solely on the provided team context due to the future date. The Minnesota Twins e...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Baltimore Orioles

Despite the Twins' better recent form, the Orioles have a slightly better projected starting pitcher and a more consistent lineup against ri...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Minnesota Twins

Training data through 2025-09 indicates the Twins have a strong home record at Target Field and better recent form (4-1) than the Orioles (1...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Over 8.5

Both teams' recent scoring output (Twins 28 runs in 5 games, Orioles 22 runs in 5 games) suggests moderate offensive activity. Target Field...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% over

Given the two probable starters and both offenses' recent scoring (Twins strong at home per the brief, Orioles averaging runs in last 5), pl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have similar runs per game averages (Orioles 4.6, Twins 4.9), and the game is expected to be played in warm conditions, which cou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both teams averaging high run totals recently with Orioles conceding 28 in 5 games. August weather at Target Field typically boosts offense....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% over

Based on the limited information from training data and the provided team context, both teams have been involved in relatively high-scoring...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Target Field is generally a neutral park for scoring, but with two offensively capable teams and decent weather expected, the total is likel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over

Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, with the Orioles scoring 22 and conceding 28 in their last 5, and the Twins sc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Minnesota Twins

68
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Minnesota Twins

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Minnesota Twins

60
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Minnesota Twins

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Baltimore Orioles

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Minnesota Twins

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Baltimore Orioles

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: d552e66613384cc6…
Kickoff
Wed, Aug 12 · 17:40 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 23997,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Target Field",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-12T17:40:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:40:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Baltimore Orioles",
        "home": "Minnesota Twins"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LLLLW",
            "record": "1W-0D-4L",
            "scored": 22,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 28
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWWWL",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 28,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 16
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 20,
            "home": 34
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →