Minnesota TwinsvsAthletics
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 5/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 2/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 5/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Under 8.5 |
65%
Minnesota -1.5 |
61%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota is in exceptional form (4W-1L, +12 run differential over last 5) while Oakland is in freefall (0-5, -22 run differential). The Twi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 8.5 Oakland's catastrophic defensive/pitching form (40 runs conceded in 5 games, -22 differential) suggests their bullpen and starters are vulne...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Minnesota -1.5 Minnesota's 4-1 form and +12 run differential vs Oakland's 0-5 skid and -22 differential justify a modest moneyline favourite, but spreads a...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
61%
Minnesota Twins First five innings favour the stronger team in the absence of specific starting-pitcher data. Minnesota's recent form and likely higher-qual... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Athletics |
60%
over |
55%
Athletics |
55%
Athletics |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Athletics The Athletics have a slightly better overall record (43-58) compared to the Twins (49-53). Despite recent struggles, the Athletics' overall...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have struggled with pitching, with the Athletics allowing 5.29 runs per game and the Twins 5.1 runs per game. This suggests a hig...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Athletics Given the Athletics' slightly better overall record and the Twins' recent struggles, the Athletics are more likely to cover the -1 spread. (...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Athletics The Athletics' overall performance suggests they may have a slight advantage in the early innings. ([thescore.com](https://www.thescore.com/...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
53%
home_ -1.5 |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Twins enter with 4 wins in their last 5 while Athletics have lost all 5; home venue at Target Field adds an edge. Both clubs have identical...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Athletics have conceded 40 runs in their last 5 while Twins have scored 28; the matchup projects above-average run scoring at Target Field....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
home_ -1.5 Twins' recent offensive output and home status give them a realistic chance to win by 2 or more. Athletics' five straight losses include hea...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
Minnesota Twins Early-game advantage goes to the home side given Twins' hot streak and Athletics' ongoing collapse. Starting-pitcher form is unknown due to... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Over 8.5 Runs |
65%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
68%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins are in significantly better recent form (4W-1L) compared to the Athletics (0W-5L), scoring more runs and conceding fewer...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 8.5 Runs The Athletics have shown poor pitching recently, conceding 40 runs in their last five games, while the Twins offense has been potent, scorin...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins' strong recent performance, including multiple wins, against the Athletics' struggling form, suggests they are capable of winning...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
68%
Minnesota Twins Without specific starting pitcher information for this future game, the overall team form dictates this pick. The Twins have been performing... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
59%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have significantly better recent form (4 wins in last 5) compared to the Athletics (5 losses in last 5). While both team...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The Twins' offense has been potent recently, and Target Field typically allows for good ball carry. While the weather forecast indicates mod...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Twins Given the Twins' superior recent form and offensive capabilities, they are favored to win by more than 1.5 runs. The Athletics' struggles, p...
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
59%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have been strong starters and have a better lineup against the projected Athletics' starter. Their recent offensive surges suggest...
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
50%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins The Twins are playing at home with strong recent form (4W-1L) compared to the Athletics (0W-5L). Despite equal rest, run differential sugges...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Target Field is a neutral park, but Athletics pitching has struggled (40 runs conceded in 5 games), while Twins offense is productive (28 ru...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Twins favored to win but covering -1.5 run line depends on margin. Recent form suggests they could win by 2+, but Athletics' offense average...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
Minnesota Twins Twins have better overall form and home advantage. First five innings often favor the home team with better recent pitching/offense. Athleti... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/6
Minnesota is in exceptional form (4W-1L, +12 run differential over last 5) while Oakland is in freefall (0-5, -22 run differential). The Twi...
The Athletics have a slightly better overall record (43-58) compared to the Twins (49-53). Despite recent struggles, the Athletics' overall...
Twins enter with 4 wins in their last 5 while Athletics have lost all 5; home venue at Target Field adds an edge. Both clubs have identical...
The Minnesota Twins are in significantly better recent form (4W-1L) compared to the Athletics (0W-5L), scoring more runs and conceding fewer...
The Minnesota Twins have significantly better recent form (4 wins in last 5) compared to the Athletics (5 losses in last 5). While both team...
The Twins are playing at home with strong recent form (4W-1L) compared to the Athletics (0W-5L). Despite equal rest, run differential sugges...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Oakland's catastrophic defensive/pitching form (40 runs conceded in 5 games, -22 differential) suggests their bullpen and starters are vulne...
Both teams have struggled with pitching, with the Athletics allowing 5.29 runs per game and the Twins 5.1 runs per game. This suggests a hig...
Athletics have conceded 40 runs in their last 5 while Twins have scored 28; the matchup projects above-average run scoring at Target Field....
The Athletics have shown poor pitching recently, conceding 40 runs in their last five games, while the Twins offense has been potent, scorin...
The Twins' offense has been potent recently, and Target Field typically allows for good ball carry. While the weather forecast indicates mod...
Target Field is a neutral park, but Athletics pitching has struggled (40 runs conceded in 5 games), while Twins offense is productive (28 ru...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 2/6
Minnesota's 4-1 form and +12 run differential vs Oakland's 0-5 skid and -22 differential justify a modest moneyline favourite, but spreads a...
Given the Athletics' slightly better overall record and the Twins' recent struggles, the Athletics are more likely to cover the -1 spread. (...
Twins' recent offensive output and home status give them a realistic chance to win by 2 or more. Athletics' five straight losses include hea...
The Twins' strong recent performance, including multiple wins, against the Athletics' struggling form, suggests they are capable of winning...
Given the Twins' superior recent form and offensive capabilities, they are favored to win by more than 1.5 runs. The Athletics' struggles, p...
Twins favored to win but covering -1.5 run line depends on margin. Recent form suggests they could win by 2+, but Athletics' offense average...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/6
First five innings favour the stronger team in the absence of specific starting-pitcher data. Minnesota's recent form and likely higher-qual...
The Athletics' overall performance suggests they may have a slight advantage in the early innings. ([thescore.com](https://www.thescore.com/...
Early-game advantage goes to the home side given Twins' hot streak and Athletics' ongoing collapse. Starting-pitcher form is unknown due to...
Without specific starting pitcher information for this future game, the overall team form dictates this pick. The Twins have been performing...
The Twins have been strong starters and have a better lineup against the projected Athletics' starter. Their recent offensive surges suggest...
Twins have better overall form and home advantage. First five innings often favor the home team with better recent pitching/offense. Athleti...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
GPT-4o Mini
Athletics
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
cc85ed182ca27f9e…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 26 · 18:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 15790,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Target Field",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-07-26T18:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 26 Jul 2026 18:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Athletics",
"home": "Minnesota Twins"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLLLL",
"record": "0W-0D-5L",
"scored": 18,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 40
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 17,
"home": 17
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.