Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · Target Field
Upcoming · in 82h 07m
Minnesota Twins logo

Minnesota TwinsvsAthletics

Athletics logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over

Minnesota's last five matches averaged 5.6 runs per game (28 / 5), and Oakland averaged 3.6 (18 / 5), suggesting combined run potential arou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% over

Both rotations feature quality starters (Ginn 3.46, Ryan sub-3.00 recently) but Oakland's overall team form (conceding lots of runs per the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% over

Both teams have shown inconsistent pitching performances, with the Athletics allowing 5.4 runs per game and the Twins allowing 5.1 runs per...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% under

Athletics poor offense and Twins pitching staff suggest a lower-scoring game at pitcher-friendly Target Field. Training data through 2023 sh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Over 8.5

Considering the Twins' robust offense (28 runs in 5 games) and the Athletics' porous defense (40 runs conceded in 5 games), the Twins are li...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

The Minnesota Twins have demonstrated a potent offense, scoring 28 runs in their last 5 games. While the Athletics have struggled offensivel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Over 7.5

Athletics have conceded 40 runs in last 5 games (8 per game), while Twins have scored 28 in that span (5.6 per game). Minnesota's lineup sho...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Minnesota Twins -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 65% Minnesota Twins -1.5

The Twins' strong recent form and run-scoring advantage over a reeling Athletics offense supports a mild spread favorite. A 1.5-run line imp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Athletics +1.5

While I expect the Twins to be the outright favorite, the A's will be starting J.T. Ginn (a quality mid-3.00 ERA arm) and runline cover (-1....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% Minnesota Twins

Given the Twins' superior recent form and home advantage, they are likely to win by at least one run, covering the -1 spread.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Minnesota Twins -1.5

Home team form edge and venue advantage point to Minnesota covering the run line. Training data through 2023 shows Twins strong against sub-...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Minnesota Twins -1.5

The significant disparity in recent team form, with the Twins winning consistently and the Athletics losing heavily, points towards a comfor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Minnesota Twins

The Minnesota Twins' superior recent form and offensive capability suggest they can cover a -1.5 spread. Their strong performance against we...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Minnesota Twins -1.5

Twins are favored to win by more than one run given their form and Athletics' struggles. However, baseball is volatile, and the Twins may no...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Minnesota Twins 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 61% Minnesota Twins

Early-inning play typically reflects starting-pitcher strength and lineup platoon advantage; Minnesota's offensive dominance (28 runs in 5 g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 45% Minnesota Twins

For the first five innings I expect a close early game, but the Twins' ability to manufacture runs at home and Joe Ryan's tendency to give q...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Minnesota Twins

The Twins' recent strong performances suggest they will have the lead after the first five innings, especially considering the Athletics' re...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 61% Minnesota Twins

Early innings favor the stronger home rotation and lineup depth. Training data through 2023 indicates Minnesota frequently leads after five...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 68% Minnesota Twins

With the Twins in strong form and the Athletics struggling, the Twins are expected to establish an early lead. The strong offensive performa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 62% Minnesota Twins

The Minnesota Twins' strong home performance and offensive prowess are likely to manifest early in the game. Given the Athletics' current st...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Minnesota Twins

Early innings often favor the home team with crowd support, and Twins are strong out of the gate. Athletics have been slow starters, as evid...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Minnesota Twins 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 72% Minnesota Twins

Minnesota is in outstanding form (4W-1L over last 5, +12 run differential) while Oakland has collapsed into a five-game losing streak with a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Minnesota Twins

At Target Field the Twins get the home-park edge and have been the hotter club in the last five matches (home form WWWWL vs. A's LLLLL in th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% Minnesota Twins

The Minnesota Twins have a stronger recent form, winning 7 of their last 10 games, compared to the Athletics' 1 win in their last 10 games....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% Minnesota Twins

Twins enter with strong recent form (4-1) while Athletics are winless in last 5; Target Field favors the home side. Training data through 20...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 75% Minnesota Twins

Based on the provided recent form, the Minnesota Twins are in excellent shape with a 4W-1L record, while the Athletics are struggling signif...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 65% Minnesota Twins

The Minnesota Twins have significantly better recent form, winning 4 of their last 5 games compared to the Athletics' 5 consecutive losses....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% Minnesota Twins

Twins have been strong at home, winning 4 of their last 5, while Athletics have lost 5 straight. Minnesota's better recent form and home fie...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Minnesota Twins

75
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Minnesota Twins

75
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Minnesota Twins

72
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Minnesota Twins

68
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Minnesota Twins

65
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Minnesota Twins

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Minnesota Twins

60

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1052–798 · 57%
-601.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 688–582 · 54%
-361.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1124–1107 · 50%
-921.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 738–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1025–1049 · 49%
-740.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 873–924 · 49%
-722.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1013–1089 · 48%
-926.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 397d0da0784b3918…
Kickoff
Sat, Jul 25 · 00:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 15225,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Target Field",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-25T00:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Athletics",
        "home": "Minnesota Twins"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LLLLL",
            "record": "0W-0D-5L",
            "scored": 18,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 40
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWWWL",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 28,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 16
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 16,
            "home": 16
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →