Milwaukee Brewers vs Cleveland Guardians
Kickoff · Tue, Jun 16 · 23:40 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e95ab9c350602b22…
- Sport
- Tue, Jun 16 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- h2h · totals · spreads · first_five_innings
- Source
- The Odds API · live
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 2832,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-16T23:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cleveland Guardians",
"home": "Milwaukee Brewers"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-14T08:54:51+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 7 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic · 4-5 -1.2u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 5-5 -0.3u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 125-128 -87.1u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 168-149 -107.9u |
58%
Milwaukee Brewers |
55%
Under 8.5 |
52%
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 |
54%
Under 4.5 (first 5 IP) |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Milwaukee Brewers As of my training data (September 2024), the Milwaukee Brewers have been competitive in the NL Central with strong run prevention. The Cleve...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 8.5 Both the Brewers and Guardians emphasize defense and pitching over raw offense. Milwaukee's run environment has historically favored pitchin...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 Home-field advantage and the Brewers' historical pitching competence support a slight edge at -1.5. However, without current roster health,...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Under 4.5 (first 5 IP) Early-inning under plays align with both teams' defensive and pitching-focused identity. Brewers and Guardians tend to feature solid startin... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 30-17 +24.4u |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 34-47 -25.2u |
55%
Milwaukee Brewers |
60%
over |
55%
Milwaukee Brewers |
55%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Milwaukee Brewers The Milwaukee Brewers have a strong home record of 21-13 and are leading the NL Central. The Cleveland Guardians have a 20-16 away record an...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have strong offenses, with the Brewers averaging 5 runs per game and the Guardians averaging 4.1 runs per game. The Brewers' home...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Milwaukee Brewers The Brewers' home advantage and superior recent form give them a slight edge. The Guardians' away record and recent performance suggest they...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Milwaukee Brewers The Brewers' home advantage and superior recent form give them a slight edge in the first five innings. The Guardians' away record and recen...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Heavy FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 112-170 -91.3u |
53%
Milwaukee Brewers |
51%
over |
49%
home_-1.5 |
52%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Milwaukee Brewers Milwaukee hosts and typically holds a slight home edge in interleague play. Guardians have shown inconsistency on the road in recent seasons...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Scoring averages in similar matchups hover near the total line. Weather and park factors at Milwaukee favor moderate run production. Trainin...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
49%
home_-1.5 Home team covers the run line at a near-coin-flip rate in low-info future games. Cleveland bullpen usage patterns add variance. Training dat...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Milwaukee Brewers Early-inning performance favors the home starter in most historical splits. Limited rest or travel impact assumed minimal. Training data thr... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro FlagshipGoogle · 4-7 -1.8u |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 135-151 -121.4u |
54%
Milwaukee Brewers |
51%
Under 8.5 |
55%
Cleveland Guardians +1.5 |
38%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Milwaukee Brewers Based on general MLB team dynamics and the inherent home-field advantage for the Milwaukee Brewers, they are given a slight edge. Without sp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
Under 8.5 Assuming a standard total line of 8.5, and considering typical MLB scoring trends often hover around this mark, a slight lean to the Under i...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cleveland Guardians +1.5 While the Brewers are favored at home in the H2H, a -1.5 run line often proves challenging in MLB, where many games are decided by a single...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
38%
Milwaukee Brewers The First Five Innings market heavily emphasizes starting pitching and early offensive production. Given the home-field advantage for the Br... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 65-141 -96.1u |
52%
Cleveland Guardians |
55%
over |
51%
Cleveland Guardians |
53%
Cleveland Guardians |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Cleveland Guardians Milwaukee Brewers are favored at home, but the Cleveland Guardians have a slightly better recent record and are known for their strong pitch...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency for higher-scoring games recently, especially when facing teams with comparable pitching strengths. The Bre...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Cleveland Guardians While the Brewers are the home team, the Guardians have a competitive edge based on their recent pitching performance and ability to grind o...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Cleveland Guardians The Guardians' starting pitching has been a strength, often allowing them to establish an early lead or keep games close in the initial inni... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 136-147 -106.2u |
55%
Milwaukee Brewers |
52%
Over 8.5 |
35%
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 |
53%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Milwaukee Brewers The Brewers have a strong home field advantage at American Family Field and typically outperform at night. The Guardians are competitive but...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Both teams have above-average offenses from 2025, and the bullpens are middle-of-the-pack. The game is at Miller Park (slight hitter's park)...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
35%
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 The Brewers are favored to win, but covering the -1.5 run line requires a margin of at least 2 runs. Given the closeness of the matchup and...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Milwaukee Brewers Starting pitchers are unknown but based on general team strength, the Brewers have a slight edge in early innings at home. The Guardians' of... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Milwaukee Brewers 6/7 |
over 3/7 |
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 3/7 |
Milwaukee Brewers 4/7 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the frontier lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.