Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 6–2
Milwaukee Brewers logo

Milwaukee BrewersvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final6–2 Locked 28picks · 18 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Milwaukee Brewers 6–2 Chicago Cubs

6 of 7 AIs leaned Milwaukee Brewers — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Milwaukee Brewers 6/7
Correct calls
6/7
Final
6–2

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Milwaukee Brewers 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Milwaukee Brewers W

As of my training data cutoff (April 2025), the Brewers have been a more consistent playoff contender than the Cubs in recent seasons, with...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 68% Milwaukee Brewers W

Milwaukee is heavily favored: Jacob Misiorowski has been historically dominant in 2026 (elite ERA and strikeout profile) while the Cubs have...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Milwaukee Brewers W

The Brewers have a strong home record and have been performing well recently, while the Cubs have struggled on the road. The Brewers' home a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Milwaukee Brewers W

Training data through 2025-09 shows Brewers with strong home record and Cubs struggling on the road in recent seasons. No live access to 202...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Milwaukee Brewers W

As I have no live access to 2026 data, this prediction relies on my training knowledge up to its cutoff. Historically, the Milwaukee Brewers...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs L

Based on training data, the Chicago Cubs have historically performed slightly better against the Milwaukee Brewers in head-to-head matchups....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Milwaukee Brewers W

The Brewers have home-field advantage and generally strong pitching, while the Cubs have been inconsistent. My training data through 2025 su...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 W

The Brewers are playing at home, which provides a marginal advantage in baseball. However, the Cubs are a strong division rival and tight sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 W

Given Misiorowski's ability to limit runs and the Cubs' rotation/injury instability, the Brewers have a reasonable chance to win by multiple...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Milwaukee Brewers W

The Brewers' home advantage and recent form suggest they will win by at least one run. The Cubs' road struggles further support this predict...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 49% home_ -1.5

Training data through 2025-09 shows close games between these teams with slight Cubs bullpen edge in late innings. Predict from historical k...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Chicago Cubs +1.5 L

Even if the Brewers are favored to win at home, a -1.5 run line is challenging in a divisional game, as many MLB contests are decided by a s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chicago Cubs L

A spread of -1 implies a relatively even game, with the favorite expected to win by just one run. Given the slight historical edge for the C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 35% Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 W

While the Brewers are favored, winning by two runs is less likely given the Cubs' ability to keep games close. The slim margin makes the spr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 8.5 L

Both the Brewers and Cubs have competitive offenses and the NL Central is typically a higher-scoring division. June weather in Milwaukee (ou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% under W

Misiorowski's extreme run suppression and strikeout ability make a low-scoring game likelier, and the Cubs' probable starter (David Peterson...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have potent offenses, and the Brewers' home games tend to be high-scoring. The combination of these factors suggests a total scor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Training data through 2025-09 indicates average run totals around 9 in Brewers-Cubs matchups. Limited 2026 info available so leaning on leag...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 54% Under 8.5 runs W

Based on historical trends and without specific 2026 team data, MLB divisional games often feature tighter pitching and more strategic play....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over W

Baseball games, especially with teams that can score, tend to exceed a 2.5 total run line with reasonable frequency. This is a general trend...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both teams have offenses that can produce runs, and the ballpark is neutral. Starting pitchers are unknown, but a slight lean to Over is bas...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Milwaukee Brewers 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Milwaukee Brewers

First five innings favor the starting pitcher quality and early offensive execution. Brewers' historical roster depth suggests slightly bett...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Milwaukee Brewers

Misiorowski's high-strikeout profile and ability to limit baserunners makes Milwaukee the most likely team to lead after five innings; the C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Milwaukee Brewers

The Brewers have been strong in the early innings at home, often taking an early lead. The Cubs' tendency to start slow on the road supports...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Milwaukee Brewers

Training data through 2025-09 favors Brewers in early innings at home due to stronger starting pitching depth. No 2026 starting lineup data...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 38% Milwaukee Brewers

The first five innings heavily depend on starting pitching. Given the Brewers' historical emphasis on strong rotations and the advantage of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

The first five innings often see early scoring as starting pitchers are fresh. Without specific pitcher data, assuming a moderate scoring pa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Milwaukee Brewers

Brewers' starting pitching has been strong early in games, and Cubs' bullpen is less of a factor in the first five. Slight home advantage su...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Milwaukee Brewers

68
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Milwaukee Brewers

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Milwaukee Brewers

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Milwaukee Brewers

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Milwaukee Brewers

54
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Milwaukee Brewers

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: be4e8d719ee4b6d3…
Kickoff
Fri, Jun 26 · 23:45 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 6345,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-26T23:45:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 26 Jun 2026 23:45:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "Milwaukee Brewers"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-24T05:45:11+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →