Miami MarlinsvsChicago Cubs
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Miami Marlins 3/5 models |
over 2/5 models |
Chicago Cubs 2/5 models |
Miami Marlins 2/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Miami Marlins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Miami Marlins -1.5 |
54%
Over 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Miami Marlins Miami is in exceptional form with 5 consecutive wins, averaging 7.2 runs per game over the last 5 matches, while Chicago has lost 2 of their...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Miami's recent offensive surge (36 runs in 5 games, 7.2 rpg average) and Chicago's defensive vulnerability (33 runs conceded, 6.6 rpg allowe...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Miami Marlins -1.5 Miami's 5-game winning streak and superior run differential (+16) support a modest home-field spread bet. However, a -1.5 line implies rough...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Over 4.5 Miami's offensive momentum (7.2 rpg average) and Chicago's recent defensive struggles create a slight lean toward early scoring. First-five-... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Miami Marlins |
55%
under |
48%
home_ -1.5 |
51%
Miami Marlins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Miami Marlins Miami's recent WWWWW form dwarfs the Cubs' WWWLL and both clubs have identical rest. loanDepot park suppresses scoring, favoring the home si...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Pitcher-friendly dimensions at loanDepot park plus both clubs' recent scoring trends point to a lower total. Identical rest days limit fatig...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
home_ -1.5 Marlins' five-game win streak gives them the edge on the run line despite being the weaker roster historically. Home park and form outweigh...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Miami Marlins Early-game advantage stays with the home club given its current streak and park effects. Bullpen usage later in games is irrelevant to the f... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Miami Marlins |
60%
Over 8.5 |
58%
Miami Marlins -1.5 |
55%
Miami Marlins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Miami Marlins Based on the provided brief and my training data through its last update, the Miami Marlins are in superior form, winning their last five ga...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 8.5 Considering the Marlins' recent high-scoring games (averaging 7.2 runs) and the Cubs' tendency to concede runs (averaging 6.6 runs allowed),...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Miami Marlins -1.5 The Miami Marlins' dominant recent form, marked by five consecutive wins and strong offensive production, suggests they are capable of winni...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Miami Marlins Without specific starting pitcher information, the Miami Marlins' potent offense, as indicated by their recent scoring average, makes them t... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
52%
Chicago Cubs |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs have a slight edge due to a historically stronger offense and a more consistent pitching rotation, even though the Miami Ma...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown a capacity to score runs recently, and the venue's moderate dimensions tend to favor offense. While the Marlins have b...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago Cubs Given the slight edge in overall team strength and offensive potential, the Chicago Cubs are favored to cover a -1 run spread. While the Mar...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs' starting pitchers have historically performed well in the early innings, and their lineup is generally capable of scoring...
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
50%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs Based on training data through 2025-09, the Cubs have historically been stronger than the Marlins overall. Even with Miami on a hot streak a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown offensive firepower in recent games, with the Marlins scoring 36 and Cubs 21 in their last five. Miami's ballpark, loa...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs are a stronger team overall and should be able to win by at least two runs, but Miami's hot streak makes this close. The spread is...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Chicago Cubs Early in games, starting pitchers and lineup quality matter most. The Cubs' starting pitching is generally more reliable, and they have the... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMiami Marlins 3/5
Miami is in exceptional form with 5 consecutive wins, averaging 7.2 runs per game over the last 5 matches, while Chicago has lost 2 of their...
Miami's recent WWWWW form dwarfs the Cubs' WWWLL and both clubs have identical rest. loanDepot park suppresses scoring, favoring the home si...
Based on the provided brief and my training data through its last update, the Miami Marlins are in superior form, winning their last five ga...
The Chicago Cubs have a slight edge due to a historically stronger offense and a more consistent pitching rotation, even though the Miami Ma...
Based on training data through 2025-09, the Cubs have historically been stronger than the Marlins overall. Even with Miami on a hot streak a...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/5
Miami's recent offensive surge (36 runs in 5 games, 7.2 rpg average) and Chicago's defensive vulnerability (33 runs conceded, 6.6 rpg allowe...
Pitcher-friendly dimensions at loanDepot park plus both clubs' recent scoring trends point to a lower total. Identical rest days limit fatig...
Considering the Marlins' recent high-scoring games (averaging 7.2 runs) and the Cubs' tendency to concede runs (averaging 6.6 runs allowed),...
Both teams have shown a capacity to score runs recently, and the venue's moderate dimensions tend to favor offense. While the Marlins have b...
Both teams have shown offensive firepower in recent games, with the Marlins scoring 36 and Cubs 21 in their last five. Miami's ballpark, loa...
Spread
ConsensusChicago Cubs 2/5
Miami's 5-game winning streak and superior run differential (+16) support a modest home-field spread bet. However, a -1.5 line implies rough...
Marlins' five-game win streak gives them the edge on the run line despite being the weaker roster historically. Home park and form outweigh...
The Miami Marlins' dominant recent form, marked by five consecutive wins and strong offensive production, suggests they are capable of winni...
Given the slight edge in overall team strength and offensive potential, the Chicago Cubs are favored to cover a -1 run spread. While the Mar...
The Cubs are a stronger team overall and should be able to win by at least two runs, but Miami's hot streak makes this close. The spread is...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMiami Marlins 2/5
Miami's offensive momentum (7.2 rpg average) and Chicago's recent defensive struggles create a slight lean toward early scoring. First-five-...
Early-game advantage stays with the home club given its current streak and park effects. Bullpen usage later in games is irrelevant to the f...
Without specific starting pitcher information, the Miami Marlins' potent offense, as indicated by their recent scoring average, makes them t...
The Chicago Cubs' starting pitchers have historically performed well in the early innings, and their lineup is generally capable of scoring...
Early in games, starting pitchers and lineup quality matter most. The Cubs' starting pitching is generally more reliable, and they have the...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Miami Marlins
Claude Haiku 4.5
Miami Marlins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Cubs
DeepSeek V3
Chicago Cubs
Grok 4 Fast
Miami Marlins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
54d93e33cf9e3ff1…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 4 · 23:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35154,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "loanDepot park",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-04T23:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Cubs",
"home": "Miami Marlins"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWWW",
"record": "5W-0D-0L",
"scored": 36,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 20
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 58,
"home": 58
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.