Mia RisticvsFrancisca Jorge
FJAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/10 models |
Mia Ristic 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 1.5 |
62%
Mia Ristic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 Best-of-3 format at the US Open typically produces competitive matches; even favoured players often drop a set. Without current form or inju...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Mia Ristic Mia Ristic is the higher-ranked player and has typically shown stronger hard-court performance in my training data (through Sep 2025). Franc... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
under |
62%
Mia Ristic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Both players prefer baseline rallies on hard and convert breaks at similar rates; expect a competitive but straight-sets outcome given Risti...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Mia Ristic Mia Ristic holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results entering 2025; Francisca Jorge has struggled against top-200 opponents on ou... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
58%
Francisca Jorge |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets Although Francisca Jorge is slightly favored, Mia Ristic has the potential to challenge and win sets. Matches between players of similar (or...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Francisca Jorge Based on historical data from my training cut-off, Francisca Jorge has consistently shown a slightly higher level of play and more experienc... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
over |
60%
Ristic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The match is anticipated to be competitive, suggesting it will likely go to a decider. Therefore, the total number of sets is expected to be...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Ristic Mia Ristic is the favored player based on general tennis knowledge. She is expected to have a higher win rate and better performance on cour... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Mia Ristic |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players have shown vulnerability in recent matches, often dropping sets even when winning. Their head-to-head (if any) suggests competi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Mia Ristic Based on training knowledge through 2025-09, Mia Ristic has shown stronger results on hard courts in recent ITF events, while Francisca Jorg... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Best-of-3 format at the US Open typically produces competitive matches; even favoured players often drop a set. Without current form or inju...
Both players prefer baseline rallies on hard and convert breaks at similar rates; expect a competitive but straight-sets outcome given Risti...
Although Francisca Jorge is slightly favored, Mia Ristic has the potential to challenge and win sets. Matches between players of similar (or...
The match is anticipated to be competitive, suggesting it will likely go to a decider. Therefore, the total number of sets is expected to be...
Both players have shown vulnerability in recent matches, often dropping sets even when winning. Their head-to-head (if any) suggests competi...
Match winner
ConsensusMia Ristic 3/5
Mia Ristic is the higher-ranked player and has typically shown stronger hard-court performance in my training data (through Sep 2025). Franc...
Mia Ristic holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results entering 2025; Francisca Jorge has struggled against top-200 opponents on ou...
Based on historical data from my training cut-off, Francisca Jorge has consistently shown a slightly higher level of play and more experienc...
Mia Ristic is the favored player based on general tennis knowledge. She is expected to have a higher win rate and better performance on cour...
Based on training knowledge through 2025-09, Mia Ristic has shown stronger results on hard courts in recent ITF events, while Francisca Jorg...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Mia Ristic
Grok 4 Fast
Mia Ristic
DeepSeek V3
Mia Ristic
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Ristic
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Francisca Jorge
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
23627e70b6f72369…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 17:25 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31130,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Francisca Jorge",
"home": "Mia Ristic"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.